Distal Versus Proximal Arm Improvement Following Paired Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy After Chronic Stroke.
Rehabilitation
Stroke
Upper extremity
Vagus nerve stimulation
Journal
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1532-821X
Titre abrégé: Arch Phys Med Rehabil
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985158R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 May 2024
28 May 2024
Historique:
received:
11
10
2023
revised:
15
05
2024
accepted:
19
05
2024
medline:
31
5
2024
pubmed:
31
5
2024
entrez:
30
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To evaluate differences in upper extremity (UE) segment-specific (proximal or distal segment) recovery after Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with UE rehabilitation (Paired-VNS) compared to rehabilitation with sham-VNS (Control). We also assessed whether gains in specific UE segments predicted clinically meaningful improvement. This study reports on a secondary analysis of the randomized, triple-blinded, sham-controlled pivotal VNS-REHAB trial. A Rasch latent regression was used to determine differences between Paired-VNS and Controls for distal and proximal UE changes after in-clinic therapy and 3-months later. Subsequently, we ran a random forest model to assess candidate predictors of meaningful improvement. Each item of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity and Wolf Motor Function Test was evaluated as a predictor of response to treatment. Data analyzed in this study were obtained from the completed VNS-REHAB trial. Participants received intensive UE rehabilitation from physical and occupational therapists in an outpatient setting for 6 weeks, followed by a home-based exercise program. Dataset included 108 participants with chronic ischemic stroke and moderate-to-severe UE impairments. N/A MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) RESULTS: Distal UE improvement was significantly greater in the Paired-VNS group compared to Controls immediately post-therapy (95% CI [0.27-0.73], p≤0.001) and after 3-months (95% CI [0.16-0.75], p=0.003). Both groups showed similar improvement in proximal UE at both time points. A subset of both distal and proximal items from the FMA-UE and WMFT were predictors of meaningful improvement. Paired-VNS improved distal UE impairment in chronic stroke to a greater degree than intensive rehabilitation alone. Proximal improvements were equally responsive to either treatment. Given that meaningful UE recovery is predicted by improvements across both proximal and distal segments, Paired-VNS may facilitate improvement that is otherwise elusive.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38815953
pii: S0003-9993(24)01014-1
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.05.018
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosures The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: IV serves as a consultant for MicroTransponder, Inc., NE is an employee of MicroTransponder, Inc., SW serves as a consultant for Saebo, Inc. and Enspire, Inc. The other authors have nothing to disclose.