Multiparametric Characterization and Spatial Distribution of Different MS Lesion Phenotypes.


Journal

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology
ISSN: 1936-959X
Titre abrégé: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003708

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 May 2024
Historique:
received: 14 12 2023
accepted: 01 03 2024
medline: 31 5 2024
pubmed: 31 5 2024
entrez: 30 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

MS lesions exhibit varying degrees of axonal and myelin damage. A comprehensive description of lesion phenotypes could contribute to an improved radiologic evaluation of smoldering inflammation and remyelination processes. This study aimed to identify in vivo distinct MS lesion types using quantitative susceptibility mapping and susceptibility mapping-weighted imaging and to characterize them through T1-relaxometry, myelin mapping, and diffusion MR imaging. The spatial distribution of lesion phenotypes in relation to ventricular CSF was investigated. MS lesions of 53 individuals were categorized into iso- or hypointense lesions, hyperintense lesions, and paramagnetic rim lesions, on the basis of their appearance on quantitative susceptibility mapping alone, according to published criteria, and with the additional support of susceptibility mapping-weighted imaging. Susceptibility values, T1-relaxation times, myelin and free water fractions, intracellular volume fraction, and the orientation dispersion index were compared among lesion phenotypes. The distance of the geometric center of each lesion from the ventricular CSF was calculated. Eight hundred ninety-six MS lesions underwent the categorization process using quantitative susceptibility mapping and susceptibility mapping-weighted imaging. The novel use of susceptibility mapping-weighted images, which revealed additional microvasculature details, led us to re-allocate several lesions to different categories, resulting in a 35.6% decrease in the number of paramagnetic rim lesions, a 22.5% decrease in hyperintense lesions, and a 17.2% increase in iso- or hypointense lesions, with respect to the categorization based on quantitative susceptibility mapping only. The outcome of the categorization based on the joint use of quantitative susceptibility mapping and susceptibility mapping-weighted imaging was that 44.4% of lesions were iso- or hypointense lesions, 47.9% were hyperintense lesions, and 7.7% were paramagnetic rim lesions. A worsening gradient was observed from iso- or hypointense lesions to hyperintense lesions to paramagnetic rim lesions in T1-relaxation times, myelin water fraction, free water faction, and intracellular volume fraction. Paramagnetic rim lesions were located closer to ventricular CSF than iso- or hypointense lesions. The volume of hyperintense lesions was associated with a more severe disease course. Quantitative susceptibility mapping and susceptibility mapping-weighted imaging allow in vivo classification of MS lesions into different phenotypes, characterized by different levels of axonal and myelin loss and spatial distribution. Hyperintense lesions and paramagnetic rim lesions, which have the most severe microstructural damage, were more often observed in the periventricular WM and were associated with a more severe disease course.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
MS lesions exhibit varying degrees of axonal and myelin damage. A comprehensive description of lesion phenotypes could contribute to an improved radiologic evaluation of smoldering inflammation and remyelination processes. This study aimed to identify in vivo distinct MS lesion types using quantitative susceptibility mapping and susceptibility mapping-weighted imaging and to characterize them through T1-relaxometry, myelin mapping, and diffusion MR imaging. The spatial distribution of lesion phenotypes in relation to ventricular CSF was investigated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
MS lesions of 53 individuals were categorized into iso- or hypointense lesions, hyperintense lesions, and paramagnetic rim lesions, on the basis of their appearance on quantitative susceptibility mapping alone, according to published criteria, and with the additional support of susceptibility mapping-weighted imaging. Susceptibility values, T1-relaxation times, myelin and free water fractions, intracellular volume fraction, and the orientation dispersion index were compared among lesion phenotypes. The distance of the geometric center of each lesion from the ventricular CSF was calculated.
RESULTS RESULTS
Eight hundred ninety-six MS lesions underwent the categorization process using quantitative susceptibility mapping and susceptibility mapping-weighted imaging. The novel use of susceptibility mapping-weighted images, which revealed additional microvasculature details, led us to re-allocate several lesions to different categories, resulting in a 35.6% decrease in the number of paramagnetic rim lesions, a 22.5% decrease in hyperintense lesions, and a 17.2% increase in iso- or hypointense lesions, with respect to the categorization based on quantitative susceptibility mapping only. The outcome of the categorization based on the joint use of quantitative susceptibility mapping and susceptibility mapping-weighted imaging was that 44.4% of lesions were iso- or hypointense lesions, 47.9% were hyperintense lesions, and 7.7% were paramagnetic rim lesions. A worsening gradient was observed from iso- or hypointense lesions to hyperintense lesions to paramagnetic rim lesions in T1-relaxation times, myelin water fraction, free water faction, and intracellular volume fraction. Paramagnetic rim lesions were located closer to ventricular CSF than iso- or hypointense lesions. The volume of hyperintense lesions was associated with a more severe disease course.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Quantitative susceptibility mapping and susceptibility mapping-weighted imaging allow in vivo classification of MS lesions into different phenotypes, characterized by different levels of axonal and myelin loss and spatial distribution. Hyperintense lesions and paramagnetic rim lesions, which have the most severe microstructural damage, were more often observed in the periventricular WM and were associated with a more severe disease course.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38816021
pii: ajnr.A8271
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8271
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Auteurs

Francesco Tazza (F)

From the Departments of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (F.T., G.B., S.S., E.C., M.I., M.C.), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

Giacomo Boffa (G)

From the Departments of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (F.T., G.B., S.S., E.C., M.I., M.C.), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

Simona Schiavi (S)

From the Departments of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (F.T., G.B., S.S., E.C., M.I., M.C.), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

Caterina Lapucci (C)

Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (C.L., L.R., M.I., M.C.), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.

Gian Franco Piredda (GF)

Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology (G.F.P., T.H., T.K.), Siemens Healthineers International AG, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Emilio Cipriano (E)

From the Departments of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (F.T., G.B., S.S., E.C., M.I., M.C.), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

Domenico Zacà (D)

Siemens Healthcare (D.Z.), Milan, Italy.

Luca Roccatagliata (L)

Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (C.L., L.R., M.I., M.C.), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Department of Health Sciences (L.R.), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

Tom Hilbert (T)

Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology (G.F.P., T.H., T.K.), Siemens Healthineers International AG, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Department of Radiology (T.H., T.K.), Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
LTS5 (T.H., T.K.), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Tobias Kober (T)

Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology (G.F.P., T.H., T.K.), Siemens Healthineers International AG, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Department of Radiology (T.H., T.K.), Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
LTS5 (T.H., T.K.), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Matilde Inglese (M)

From the Departments of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (F.T., G.B., S.S., E.C., M.I., M.C.), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy m.inglese@unige.it.
Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (C.L., L.R., M.I., M.C.), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.

Mauro Costagli (M)

From the Departments of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (F.T., G.B., S.S., E.C., M.I., M.C.), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (C.L., L.R., M.I., M.C.), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.

Classifications MeSH