Equivalence study of the resin-dentine interface of internal tunnel restorations when using an enamel infiltrant resin with ethanol-wet dentine bonding.
Humans
Dentin
Ethanol
/ chemistry
Dental Bonding
/ methods
Dental Enamel
Dentin-Bonding Agents
/ chemistry
Molar, Third
Resin Cements
/ chemistry
Dental Restoration, Permanent
/ methods
Microscopy, Confocal
Resins, Synthetic
/ chemistry
Dental Caries
/ therapy
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Composite Resins
/ chemistry
Confocal laser scanning microscopy
Dental adhesives
Dentine bonding
Ethanol-wet bonding
Hybrid layer
Icon
Resin infiltration
Scanning electron microscopy
Scotchbond multi-purpose
Split-tooth design
Syntac
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 05 2024
30 05 2024
Historique:
received:
18
02
2024
accepted:
27
05
2024
medline:
31
5
2024
pubmed:
31
5
2024
entrez:
30
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This preregistered ex vivo investigation examined the dentinal hybrid layer formation of a resinous infiltrant (Icon), with reference to both thickness (HLT) and homogeneity when combined with modified tunnel preparation (occlusal cavity only) and internal/external caries infiltration. The adhesives Syntac and Scotchbond MP were used as controls (Groups 1 and 3) or in combination with Icon (Groups 2 and 4). A split-tooth design using healthy third molars from 20 donors resulted in 20 prepared dentine cavities per experimental group. The cavity surfaces (n = 80) were etched (37% H
Identifiants
pubmed: 38816512
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63289-0
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-63289-0
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ethanol
3K9958V90M
Dentin-Bonding Agents
0
Resin Cements
0
icon infiltrant
0
Resins, Synthetic
0
Composite Resins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
12444Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Kielbassa, A. M., Ulrich, I., Treven, L. & Mueller, J. An updated review on the resin infiltration technique of incipient proximal enamel lesions. Med. Evol. 16, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36646.37443 (2010).
doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36646.37443
Kielbassa, A. M., Müller, J. & Gernhardt, C. R. Closing the gap between oral hygiene and minimally invasive dentistry: A review on the resin infiltration technique of incipient (proximal) enamel lesions. Quintessence Int. 40, 663–681 (2009).
pubmed: 19639091
Paris, S., Meyer-Lueckel, H. & Kielbassa, A. M. Resin infiltration of natural caries lesions. J. Dent. Res. 86, 662–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910708600715 (2007).
doi: 10.1177/154405910708600715
pubmed: 17586715
Youssef, A. et al. Improving oral health: A short-term split-mouth randomized clinical trial revealing the superiority of resin infiltration over remineralization of white spot lesions. Quintessence Int. 51, 696–709. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a45104 (2020).
doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a45104
pubmed: 32901234
Ulrich, I., Mueller, J., Wolgin, M., Frank, W. & Kielbassa, A. M. Tridimensional surface roughness analysis after resin infiltration of (deproteinized) natural subsurface carious lesions. Clin. Oral Investig. 19, 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1372-5 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1372-5
pubmed: 25483122
El Meligy, O. A. E. S., Alamoudi, N. M., Eldin Ibrahim, S. T., Felemban, O. M. & Al-Tuwirqi, A. A. Effect of resin infiltration application on early proximal caries lesions in vitro. J. Dent. Sci. 16, 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.04.005 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.04.005
pubmed: 33384812
Chen, Y., Chen, D. & Lin, H. Infiltration and sealing for managing non-cavitated proximal lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health 21, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01364-4 (2021).
doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01364-4
pubmed: 33413327
pmcid: 7791990
Elrashid, A. H., Alshaiji, B. S., Saleh, S. A., Zada, K. A. & Baseer, M. A. Efficacy of resin infiltrate in noncavitated proximal carious lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 9, 211–218. https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_26_19 (2019).
doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_26_19
pubmed: 31198691
pmcid: 6559044
Chatzimarkou, S., Koletsi, D. & Kavvadia, K. The effect of resin infiltration on proximal caries lesions in primary and permanent teeth. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. J. Dent. 77, 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.08.004 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.08.004
pubmed: 30092238
Liang, Y., Deng, Z., Dai, X., Tian, J. & Zhao, W. Micro-invasive interventions for managing non-cavitated proximal caries of different depths: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Oral Investig. 22, 2675–2684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2605-9 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2605-9
pubmed: 30238416
Dorri, M., Dunne, S. M., Walsh, T. & Schwendicke, F. Micro-invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, CD010431–CD010446. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010431.pub2 (2015).
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010431.pub2
pubmed: 26545080
pmcid: 8504982
Ammari, M. M. et al. Is non-cavitated proximal lesion sealing an effective method for caries control in primary and permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dent. 42, 1217–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.07.015 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.07.015
pubmed: 25066832
Lin, G. S. S. et al. Effectiveness of resin infiltration in caries inhibition and aesthetic appearance improvement of white-spot lesions: An umbrella review. J. Evid. Based Dent. Pract. 22, 101–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101723 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101723
Kielbassa, A. M. et al. Ex vivo investigation on internal tunnel approach/internal resin infiltration and external nanosilver-modified resin infiltration of proximal caries exceeding into dentin. PLoS One 15, e0228249. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228249 (2020).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228249
pubmed: 31990942
pmcid: 6986723
Kielbassa, A. M. et al. External and internal resin infiltration of natural proximal subsurface caries lesions: A valuable enhancement of the internal tunnel restoration. Quintessence Int. 48, 357–368. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a37799 (2017).
doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a37799
pubmed: 28294198
Krithikadatta, J., Gopikrishna, V. & Datta, M. CRIS Guidelines (checklist for reporting in-vitro studies): A concept note on the need for standardized guidelines for improving quality and transparency in reporting in-vitro studies in experimental dental research. J. Conserv. Dent. 17, 301–304. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.136338 (2014).
doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.136338
pubmed: 25125839
pmcid: 4127685
Faggion, C. M. Jr. Guidelines for reporting pre-clinical in vitro studies on dental materials. J. Evid. Based Dent. Pract. 12, 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2012.10.001 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2012.10.001
pubmed: 23177493
Central Ethical Review Committee. The use of human body materials for the purposes of medical research 1–16. https://www.zentrale-ethikkommission.de/fileadmin/user_upload/_old-files/downloads/pdf-Ordner/Zeko/Patientenbezogen1.pdf (2003).
Manfroi, F. B. et al. Bond strength of a novel one bottle multi-mode adhesive to human dentin after six months of storage. Open Dent. J. 10, 268–277. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601610010268 (2016).
doi: 10.2174/1874210601610010268
pubmed: 27347230
pmcid: 4901199
Ding, P. G., Wolff, D., Pioch, T., Staehle, H. J. & Dannewitz, B. Relationship between microtensile bond strength and nanoleakage at the composite-dentin interface. Dent. Mater. 25, 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.05.009 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.05.009
pubmed: 18606443
Armstrong, S. et al. Academy of dental materials guidance on in vitro testing of dental composite bonding effectiveness to dentin/enamel using micro-tensile bond strength (muTBS) approach. Dent. Mater. 33, 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.015 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.015
pubmed: 28007396
Awad, M. M., Alrahlah, A., Matinlinna, J. P. & Hamama, H. H. Effect of adhesive air-drying time on bond strength to dentin: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 90, 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.02.006 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.02.006
Łagocka, R., Jakubowska, K., Chlubek, D. & Buczkowska-Radlińska, J. The influence of irradiation time and layer thickness on elution of triethylene glycol dimethacrylate from SDR bulk-fill composite. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 3481723. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3481723 (2016).
doi: 10.1155/2016/3481723
pubmed: 27366742
pmcid: 4913063
Wacławczyk, A. et al. TEGDMA and UDMA monomers released from composite dental material polymerized with diode and halogen lamps. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 27, 469–476. https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/68382 (2018).
doi: 10.17219/acem/68382
pubmed: 29558043
Lang, T. A. & Altman, D. G. Basic statistical reporting for articles published in biomedical journals: The „statistical analyses and methods in the published literature" or the SAMPL guidelines. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 52, 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.09.006 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.09.006
pubmed: 25441757
Anchieta, R. B. et al. Analysis of hybrid layer thickness, resin tag length and their correlation with microtensile bond strength using a total etch adhesive to intact dentin. Acta Odontol. Latinoam. 24, 272–278 (2011).
pubmed: 22550821
Kharouf, N. et al. Does adhesive layer thickness and tag length influence short/long-term bond strength of universal adhesive systems? An in-vitro study. Appl. Sci. 11, 2635. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062635 (2021).
doi: 10.3390/app11062635
Lakens, D. Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 8, 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617697177 (2017).
doi: 10.1177/1948550617697177
pubmed: 28736600
pmcid: 5502906
Cheng, L. et al. Expert consensus on dental caries management. Int. J. Oral Sci. 14, 17–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-022-00167-3 (2022).
doi: 10.1038/s41368-022-00167-3
pubmed: 35361749
pmcid: 8971510
Damian, L. R. et al. Impact of dentistry materials on chemical remineralisation/infiltration versus salivary remineralisation of enamel—In vitro study. Materials (Basel) 15, 7258. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15207258 (2022).
doi: 10.3390/ma15207258
pubmed: 36295323
Bourouni, S., Dritsas, K., Kloukos, D. & Wierichs, R. J. Efficacy of resin infiltration to mask post-orthodontic or non-post-orthodontic white spot lesions or fluorosis—A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Oral Investig. 25, 4711–4719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03931-7 (2021).
doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03931-7
pubmed: 34106348
pmcid: 8342329
Lasfargues, J. J., Bonte, E., Guerrieri, A. & Fezzani, L. Minimal intervention dentistry: Part 6. Caries inhibition by resin infiltration. Br. Dent. J. 214, 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.54 (2013).
doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.54
pubmed: 23348449
Mazzitelli, C. et al. An insight into enamel resin infiltrants with experimental compositions. Polymers (Basel) 14, 5553. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14245553 (2022).
doi: 10.3390/polym14245553
pubmed: 36559920
da Silva Neto, J. M., dos Santos, R. L., Sampaio, M. C., Sampaio, F. C. & Passos, I. A. Radiographic diagnosis of incipient proximal caries: An ex-vivo study. Braz. Dent. J. 19, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-64402008000200002 (2008).
doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402008000200002
pubmed: 18568221
Antipoviene, A., Girijotaite, M. & Bendoraitiene, E. A. Assessment of the depth of clinically detected approximal caries lesions using digital imaging fiber-optic transillumination in comparison to periapical radiographs. J. Oral Maxillofac. Res. 11, e3-6. https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2020.11103 (2020).
doi: 10.5037/jomr.2020.11103
pubmed: 32377327
pmcid: 7191380
Hala, L. A., Mello, J. B. D. & Carvalho, P. L. D. Evaluation of the effectiveness of clinical and radiographic analysis for the diagnosis of proximal caries for different clinical experience levels: Comparing lesion depth through histological analysis. Braz. J. Oral Sci. 5, 1012–1017. https://doi.org/10.20396/BJOS.V5I17.8641887 (2006).
doi: 10.20396/BJOS.V5I17.8641887
Tiuraniemi, S. et al. Success of resin infiltration treatment on interproximal tooth surfaces in young adults—A practice-based follow-up study. Clin. Exp. Dent. Res. 7, 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.349 (2021).
doi: 10.1002/cre2.349
pubmed: 33242226
Peters, M. C., Hopkins, A. R. Jr., Zhu, L. & Yu, Q. Efficacy of proximal resin infiltration on caries inhibition: Results from a 3-year randomized controlled clinical trial. J. Dent. Res. 98, 1497–1502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034519876853 (2019).
doi: 10.1177/0022034519876853
pubmed: 31526071
Martignon, S., Ekstrand, K. R., Gomez, J., Lara, J. S. & Cortes, A. Infiltrating/sealing proximal caries lesions: A 3-year randomized clinical trial. J. Dent. Res. 91, 288–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034511435328 (2012).
doi: 10.1177/0022034511435328
pubmed: 22257664
Jorge, R. C., Ammari, M. M., Soviero, V. M. & Souza, I. P. R. Randomized controlled clinical trial of resin infiltration in primary molars: 2 years follow-up. J. Dent. 90, 103184–103186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103184 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103184
pubmed: 31465818
Sarti, C. S., Vizzotto, M. B., Filgueiras, L. V., Bonifácio, C. C. & Rodrigues, J. A. Two-year split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial on the progression of proximal carious lesions on primary molars after resin infiltration. Pediatr. Dent. 42, 110–115 (2020).
pubmed: 32276676
Diab, E., Hesse, D. & Bonifacio, C. C. A retrospective clinical study on the resin infiltration of proximal caries lesions: The operator’s effect. Eur. Arch. Paediatr. Dent. 22, 879–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-021-00653-y (2021).
doi: 10.1007/s40368-021-00653-y
pubmed: 34570361
pmcid: 8526425
Brantley, C. F., Bader, J. D., Shugars, D. A. & Nesbit, S. P. Does the cycle of rerestoration lead to larger restorations?. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 126, 1407–1413. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0052 (1995).
doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0052
pubmed: 7594013
Liu, Y. H. et al. An experimental study on the penetration abilities of resin infiltration into proximal caries lesions in primary molars. Chin. J. Stomatol. 47, 684–688. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2012.11.011 (2012).
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2012.11.011
Bakhshandeh, A., Floriano, I., Braga, M. M., Thorlacius, K. A. & Ekstrand, K. R. Relationship between depth of approximal caries lesions and presence of bacteria in the dentine in primary and permanent posterior teeth: A radiographic examination with microbiological evaluation. Acta Odontol. Scand. 76, 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2018.1444201 (2018).
doi: 10.1080/00016357.2018.1444201
pubmed: 29484911
Oong, E. M., Griffin, S. O., Kohn, W. G., Gooch, B. F. & Caufield, P. W. The effect of dental sealants on bacteria levels in caries lesions: A review of the evidence. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 139, 271–278. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0156 (2008).
doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0156
pubmed: 18310731
Hesse, D. et al. Sealing versus partial caries removal in primary molars: A randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 14, 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-58 (2014).
doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-58
pubmed: 24884684
pmcid: 4045925
Bakhshandeh, A., Qvist, V. & Ekstrand, K. R. Sealing occlusal caries lesions in adults referred for restorative treatment: 2–3 years of follow-up. Clin. Oral Investig. 16, 521–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0549-4 (2012).
doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0549-4
pubmed: 21479565
Griffin, S. O. et al. The effectiveness of sealants in managing caries lesions. J. Dent. Res. 87, 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808700211 (2008).
doi: 10.1177/154405910808700211
pubmed: 18218845
Ei, T. Z. et al. Three-dimensional assessment of proximal contact enamel using optical coherence tomography. Dent. Mater. 35, e74–e82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.01.008 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.01.008
pubmed: 30770133
Kielbassa, A. M., Paris, S., Lussi, A. & Meyer-Lueckel, H. Evaluation of cavitations in proximal caries lesions at various magnification levels in vitro. J. Dent. 34, 817–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.04.001 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.04.001
pubmed: 16730403
Walker, B. N., Makinson, O. F. & Peters, M. C. Enamel cracks. The role of enamel lamellae in caries initiation. Aust. Dent. J. 43, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1998.tb06099.x (1998).
doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1998.tb06099.x
pubmed: 9612985
Ricucci, D., Siqueira, J. F. Jr., Loghin, S. & Berman, L. H. The cracked tooth: Histopathologic and histobacteriologic aspects. J. Endod. 41, 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.021 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.021
pubmed: 25447500
Kahler, B., Moule, A. & Stenzel, D. Bacterial contamination of cracks in symptomatic vital teeth. Aust. Endod. J. 26, 115–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2000.tb00296.x (2000).
doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2000.tb00296.x
pubmed: 11359251
Kielbassa, A. M. et al. Resin infiltration of deproteinised natural occlusal subsurface lesions improves initial quality of fissure sealing. Int. J. Oral Sci. 9, 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2017.15 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/ijos.2017.15
pubmed: 28621326
pmcid: 5518973
Shahmoradi, M., Wan, B., Zhang, Z., Swain, M. & Li, Q. Mechanical failure of posterior teeth due to caries and occlusal wear—A modelling study. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 125, 104942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104942 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104942
pubmed: 34800891
Massé, L. & Garot, E. Infiltrant resin and enamel infractions: Two case reports of a novel and minimally invasive approach. Quintessence Int. 54, 180–185. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b3631849 (2023).
doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b3631849
pubmed: 36445777
Parolo, C. C. & Maltz, M. Microbial contamination of noncavitated caries lesions: A scanning electron microscopic study. Caries Res. 40, 536–541. https://doi.org/10.1159/000095654 (2006).
doi: 10.1159/000095654
pubmed: 17063026
Ricucci, D. & Siqueira, J. F. Jr. Bacteriologic status of non-cavitated proximal enamel caries lesions. A histologic and histobacteriologic study. J. Dent. 100, 103422–103427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103422 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103422
pubmed: 32615236
Flemming, J., Hannig, C. & Hannig, M. Caries management—The role of surface interactions in de- and remineralization-processes. J. Clin. Med. 11, 7044. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237044 (2022).
doi: 10.3390/jcm11237044
pubmed: 36498618
pmcid: 9737279
Damen, J. J. & ten Cate, J. M. Inhibition of hydroxyapatite crystal growth by lipoteichoic acid. Arch. Oral Biol. 39, 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(94)90109-0 (1994).
doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(94)90109-0
pubmed: 8185499
Bibby, B. G. Organic enamel material and caries. Caries Res. 5, 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1159/000259759 (1971).
doi: 10.1159/000259759
pubmed: 4943288
de Sousa, F. B., Lelis, I. M. P., Figueiredo, R., Pires, A. C. & Gerlach, R. F. Quantitative study of the proportion of the pore volume of human fluorotic enamel filled by resin infiltrant. Arch. Oral Biol. 82, 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.06.017 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.06.017
pubmed: 28641179
Robinson, C. et al. The chemistry of enamel caries. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 11, 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/10454411000110040601 (2000).
doi: 10.1177/10454411000110040601
pubmed: 11132767
Shore, R. C., Kirkham, J., Brookes, S. J., Wood, S. R. & Robinson, C. Distribution of exogenous proteins in caries lesions in relation to the pattern of demineralisation. Caries Res. 34, 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1159/000016588 (2000).
doi: 10.1159/000016588
pubmed: 10773638
Larsen, M. J. & Pearce, E. I. Some notes on the diffusion of acidic and alkaline agents into natural human caries lesions in vitro. Arch. Oral Biol. 37, 411–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(92)90025-4 (1992).
doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(92)90025-4
pubmed: 1610309
Barbosa de Sousa, F., Dias Soares, J. & Sampaio Vianna, S. Natural enamel caries: A comparative histological study on biochemical volumes. Caries Res. 47, 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1159/000345378 (2013).
doi: 10.1159/000345378
pubmed: 23222001
Shellis, R. P., Hallsworth, A. S., Kirkham, J. & Robinson, C. Organic material and the optical properties of the dark zone in caries lesions of enamel. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 110, 392–395. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.21337.x (2002).
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.21337.x
pubmed: 12664471
de Holanda Ferreira, D. A., Rolimde Abreu, N. M., Meira, K. R. S. & de Sousa, F. B. Organic volume and permeability variations in the surface layer of artificial and natural enamel carious lesions. Arch. Oral Biol. 148, 105645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2023.105645 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2023.105645
pubmed: 36804643
Nizami, M. Z. I. et al. Tunnel restoration: A minimally invasive dentistry practice. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dent. 14, 207–216. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S372165 (2022).
doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S372165
pubmed: 35873904
pmcid: 9296866
Chu, C. H., Mei, M. L., Cheung, C. & Nalliah, R. P. Restoring proximal caries lesions conservatively with tunnel restorations. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dent. 5, 43–50. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S48567 (2013).
doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S48567
pubmed: 24019754
pmcid: 3760193
Wiegand, A. & Attin, T. Treatment of proximal caries lesions by tunnel restorations. Dent. Mater. 23, 1461–1467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.12.004 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.12.004
pubmed: 17320944
Ratledge, D. K., Kidd, E. A. & Treasure, E. T. The tunnel restoration. Br. Dent. J. 193, 501–506. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801609 (2002).
doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801609
pubmed: 12572734
Strand, G. V. & Tveit, A. B. Effectiveness of caries removal by the partial tunnel preparation method. Scand. J. Dent. Res. 101, 270–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1993.tb01118.x (1993).
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1993.tb01118.x
pubmed: 8248727
Preusse, P. J. et al. Class II resin composite restorations—Tunnel vs. box-only in vitro and in vivo. Clin. Oral Investig. 25, 737–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03649-y (2021).
doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03649-y
pubmed: 33169273
Cho, A. R., Krejci, I. & Bortolotto, T. Minimally invasive proximal cavities restored with a hybrid, flowable and low-shrinking composite: Effect of marginal ridge preservation on failure pattern. J. Dent. Maxillofac. Res. 3, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31038/JDMR.2020314 (2020).
doi: 10.31038/JDMR.2020314
Yu, O. Y. et al. Conservative composite resin restoration for proximal caries—Two case reports. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dent. 12, 415–422. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S270453 (2020).
doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S270453
pubmed: 33116910
pmcid: 7549752
Ebert, J., Frankenberger, R. & Petschelt, A. A novel approach for filling tunnel-prepared teeth with composites of two different consistencies: A case presentation. Quintessence Int. 43, 93–96 (2012).
pubmed: 22257869
Ji, W., Chen, Z. & Frencken, J. E. Strength of tunnel-restored teeth with different materials and marginal ridge height. Dent. Mater. 25, 1363–1370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.007 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.007
pubmed: 19595444
Kinomoto, Y., Inoue, Y. & Ebisu, S. A two-year comparison of resin-based composite tunnel and Class II restorations in a randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Dent. 17, 253–256 (2004).
pubmed: 15478486
Purk, J. H., Roberts, R. S., Elledge, D. A., Chappell, R. P. & Eick, J. D. Marginal ridge strength of Class II tunnel restorations. Am. J. Dent. 8, 75–79 (1995).
pubmed: 7546482
de Freitas, A. R., de Andrada, M. A., Baratieri, L. N., Monteiro, S. Jr. & de Sousa, C. N. Clinical evaluation of composite resin tunnel restorations on primary molars. Quintessence Int. 25, 419–424 (1994).
pubmed: 7938431
Kielbassa, A. M., Oehme, E. P., Shakavets, N. & Wolgin, M. In vitro wear of (resin-coated) high-viscosity glass ionomer cements and glass hybrid restorative systems. J. Dent. 105, 103554–103558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103554 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103554
pubmed: 33309807
Matuda, A. G. N. et al. Computer aided design modelling and finite element analysis of premolar proximal cavities restored with resin composites. Materials (Basel) 14, 2366. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092366 (2021).
doi: 10.3390/ma14092366
pubmed: 34062936
Ouldyerou, A. et al. Biomechanical performance of resin composite on dental tissue restoration: A finite element analysis. PLoS One 18, e0295582. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295582 (2023).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295582
pubmed: 38128035
pmcid: 10734934
Guo, X., Yu, Y., Gao, S., Zhang, Z. & Zhao, H. Biodegradation of dental resin-based composite—A potential factor affecting the bonding effect: A narrative review. Biomedicines 10, 2313. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10092313 (2022).
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10092313
pubmed: 36140414
pmcid: 9496159
Nakabayashi, N. & Takarada, K. Effect of HEMA on bonding to dentin. Dent. Mater. 8, 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90067-m (1992).
doi: 10.1016/0109-5641(92)90067-m
pubmed: 1521692
Zare, M. et al. pHEMA: An overview for biomedical applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 6376. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22126376 (2021).
doi: 10.3390/ijms22126376
pubmed: 34203608
pmcid: 8232190
Szczesio-Wlodarczyk, A. et al. The influence of low-molecular-weight monomers (TEGDMA, HDDMA, HEMA) on the properties of selected matrices and composites based on Bis-GMA and UDMA. Materials (Basel) 15, 2649. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15072649 (2022).
doi: 10.3390/ma15072649
pubmed: 35407980
Hardan, L. et al. Effect of active bonding application after selective dentin etching on the immediate and long-term bond strength of two universal adhesives to dentin. Polymers (Basel) 14, 1129. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14061129 (2022).
doi: 10.3390/polym14061129
pubmed: 35335459
Saikaew, P. et al. Role of the smear layer in adhesive dentistry and the clinical applications to improve bonding performance. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 58, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2021.12.001 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2021.12.001
pubmed: 35140823
pmcid: 8814382
Hashimoto, M. et al. The effect of hybrid layer thickness on bond strength: Demineralized dentin zone of the hybrid layer. Dent. Mater. 16, 406–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00035-x (2000).
doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00035-x
pubmed: 10967189
Dačić, S. et al. Influence of etching mode and composite resin type on bond strength to dentin using universal adhesive system. Microsc. Res. Tech. 84, 1212–1219. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23680 (2021).
doi: 10.1002/jemt.23680
pubmed: 33354799
Ayar, M. K. A review of ethanol wet-bonding: Principles and techniques. Eur. J. Dent. 10, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.175687 (2016).
doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.175687
pubmed: 27011756
pmcid: 4784147
Pashley, D. H. et al. From dry bonding to water-wet bonding to ethanol-wet bonding. A review of the interactions between dentin matrix and solvated resins using a macromodel of the hybrid layer. Am. J. Dent. 20, 7–20 (2007).
pubmed: 17380802
Scheffel, D. L. et al. Immediate human pulp response to ethanol-wet bonding technique. J. Dent. 43, 537–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.02.014 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.02.014
pubmed: 25748671
pmcid: 4758457
Sauro, S. et al. Resin-dentin bonds to EDTA-treated vs. acid-etched dentin using ethanol wet-bonding. Part II: Effects of mechanical cycling load on microtensile bond strengths. Dent. Mater. 27, 563–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.02.010 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.02.010
pubmed: 21453961
Ayar, M. K. Effect of simplified ethanol-wet bonding on microtensile bond strengths of dentin adhesive agents with different solvents. J. Dent. Sci. 10, 270–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2014.06.001 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2014.06.001
Sadek, F. T. et al. One-year stability of resin-dentin bonds created with a hydrophobic ethanol-wet bonding technique. Dent. Mater. 26, 380–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.12.009 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.12.009
pubmed: 20083304
Parthasarathy, R., Misra, A., Park, J., Ye, Q. & Spencer, P. Diffusion coefficients of water and leachables in methacrylate-based crosslinked polymers using absorption experiments. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 23, 1157–1172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-012-4595-5 (2012).
doi: 10.1007/s10856-012-4595-5
pubmed: 22430592
pmcid: 3361067
Alqahtani, S., Abusaq, A., Alghamdi, M., Shokair, N. & Albounni, R. Colour stability of resin infiltrated white spot lesion after exposure to stain-causing drinks. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 29, 1079–1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.09.063 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.09.063
pubmed: 35197776
Yeslam, H. E. & AlZahrani, S. J. Time-dependent effect of intense capsule-coffee and bleaching on the color of resin-infiltrated enamel white spot lesions: An in vitro study. PeerJ 10, 14135. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14135 (2022).
doi: 10.7717/peerj.14135
Puleio, F. et al. Long-term chromatic durability of white spot lesions through employment of infiltration resin treatment. Medicina 59, 749–748. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040749 (2023).
doi: 10.3390/medicina59040749
pubmed: 37109707
pmcid: 10146668
Knösel, M., Eckstein, A. & Helms, H. J. Long-term follow-up of camouflage effects following resin infiltration of post orthodontic white-spot lesions in vivo. Angle Orthod. 89, 33–39. https://doi.org/10.2319/052118-383.1 (2019).
doi: 10.2319/052118-383.1
pubmed: 30324799
Burrer, P., Dang, H., Par, M., Attin, T. & Tauböck, T. T. Effect of over-etching and prolonged application time of a universal adhesive on dentin bond strength. Polymers (Basel) 12, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122902 (2020).
doi: 10.3390/polym12122902
Hardan, L. et al. Effect of different application modalities on the bonding performance of adhesive systems to dentin: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cells 12, 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12010190 (2023).
doi: 10.3390/cells12010190
pubmed: 36611983
pmcid: 9818277
Hardan, L. et al. Bond strength of universal adhesives to dentin: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Polymers (Basel) 13, 814–834. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13050814 (2021).
doi: 10.3390/polym13050814
pubmed: 33799923
Abedin, F., Ye, Q., Good, H. J., Parthasarathy, R. & Spencer, P. Polymerization- and solvent-induced phase separation in hydrophilic-rich dentin adhesive mimic. Acta Biomater. 10, 3038–3047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.001 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.001
pubmed: 24631658
pmcid: 4041818
Ricci, H. A. et al. Wettability of chlorhexidine treated non-carious and caries-affected dentine. Aust. Dent. J. 59, 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12150 (2014).
doi: 10.1111/adj.12150
pubmed: 24697341
Shin, T. P., Yao, X., Huenergardt, R., Walker, M. P. & Wang, Y. Morphological and chemical characterization of bonding hydrophobic adhesive to dentin using ethanol wet bonding technique. Dent. Mater. 25, 1050–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.03.006 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.03.006
pubmed: 19371945
pmcid: 2748385
Mokeem, L. S., Garcia, I. M. & Melo, M. A. Degradation and failure phenomena at the dentin bonding interface. Biomedicines 11, 1256. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11051256 (2023).
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11051256
pubmed: 37238927
pmcid: 10215576
Schärer, B. M. & Peutzfeldt, A. Impact of adhesive application errors on dentin bond strength of resin composite. Biomater. Investig. Dent. 9, 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2022.2138405 (2022).
doi: 10.1080/26415275.2022.2138405
pubmed: 36389269
pmcid: 9648378
Stape, T. H. S. et al. To etch or not to etch, Part II: On the hydrophobic-rich content and fatigue strength of universal adhesives. Dent. Mater. 38, 1419–1431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.06.031 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.06.031
pubmed: 35792013
Ye, Q. et al. Quantitative analysis of aqueous phase composition of model dentin adhesives experiencing phase separation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 100, 1086–1092. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32675 (2012).
doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.32675
pubmed: 22331596
pmcid: 3673304
Bitter, K., Paris, S., Mueller, J., Neumann, K. & Kielbassa, A. M. Correlation of scanning electron and confocal laser scanning microscopic analyses for visualization of dentin/adhesive interfaces in the root canal. J. Adhes. Dent. 11, 7–14 (2009).
pubmed: 19343922
Paris, S., Meyer-Lueckel, H., Cölfen, H. & Kielbassa, A. M. Penetration coefficients of commercially available and experimental composites intended to infiltrate enamel carious lesions. Dent. Mater. 23, 742–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.029 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.029
pubmed: 16911822
Paris, S., Meyer-Lueckel, H., Cölfen, H. & Kielbassa, A. M. Resin infiltration of artificial enamel caries lesions with experimental light curing resins. Dent. Mater. J. 26, 582–588. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.582 (2007).
doi: 10.4012/dmj.26.582
pubmed: 17886464
Mueller, J., Meyer-Lueckel, H., Paris, S., Hopfenmuller, W. & Kielbassa, A. M. Inhibition of lesion progression by the penetration of resins in vitro: Influence of the application procedure. Oper. Dent. 31, 338–345. https://doi.org/10.2341/05-39 (2006).
doi: 10.2341/05-39
pubmed: 16802642
Paris, S., Meyer-Lueckel, H., Mueller, J., Hummel, M. & Kielbassa, A. M. Progression of sealed initial bovine enamel lesions under demineralizing conditions in vitro. Caries Res. 40, 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1159/000091058 (2006).
doi: 10.1159/000091058
pubmed: 16508269
Barszczewska-Rybarek, I. M. A guide through the dental dimethacrylate polymer network structural characterization and interpretation of physico-mechanical properties. Materials (Basel) 12, 4057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12244057 (2019).
doi: 10.3390/ma12244057
pubmed: 31817410
Pfeifer, C. S. et al. Characterization of dimethacrylate polymeric networks: A study of the crosslinked structure formed by monomers used in dental composites. Eur. Polym. J. 47, 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.11.007 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.11.007
pubmed: 21499538
pmcid: 3074112
Park, E.-S., Kim, C.-K., Bae, J.-H. & Cho, B.-H. The effect of the strength and wetting characteristics of Bis-GMA/TEGDMA-based adhesives on the bond strength to dentin. J. Korean Acad. Conserv. Dent. 36, 139–148. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.2.139 (2011).
doi: 10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.2.139
Han, M.-H., Choi, B.-B. & Woo, Y.-H. Effect of HEMA and TEGDMA on the properties of experimental composite resins. J. Korean Acad. Prosthodont. 41, 476–492 (2003).
Reichl, F. X. et al. Elution of TEGDMA and HEMA from polymerized resin-based bonding systems. Dent. Mater. 28, 1120–1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.06.010 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.06.010
pubmed: 22995638
De Angelis, F. et al. Meta-analytical analysis on components released from resin-based dental materials. Clin. Oral Investig. 26, 6015–6041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04625-4 (2022).
doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04625-4
pubmed: 35870020
pmcid: 9525379
Martinez-Gonzalez, M. et al. Toxicity of resin-matrix cements in contact with fibroblast or mesenchymal cells. Odontology 111, 310–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-022-00758-w (2023).
doi: 10.1007/s10266-022-00758-w
pubmed: 36370322
Schneider, T. R., Hakami-Tafreshi, R., Tomasino-Perez, A., Tayebi, L. & Lobner, D. Effects of dental composite resin monomers on dental pulp cells. Dent. Mater. J. 38, 579–583. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-163 (2019).
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2018-163
pubmed: 31105159
Barelli-Corbo, F. et al. Effects of two methacrylic monomers on pulp cells differentiation capability: A preliminary in vitro study. Mater. Sci. Eng. J. 1, 1003 (2017).
Mendes Soares, I. P. et al. Response of pulp cells to resin infiltration of enamel white spot-like lesions. Dent. Mater. 37, e329–e340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2021.01.014 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.01.014
pubmed: 33579532
Galler, K. M. et al. TEGDMA reduces mineralization in dental pulp cells. J. Dent. Res. 90, 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510384618 (2011).
doi: 10.1177/0022034510384618
pubmed: 21135193
Baldion, P. A., Velandia-Romero, M. L. & Castellanos, J. E. Dental resin monomers induce early and potent oxidative damage on human odontoblast-like cells. Chem. Biol. Interact. 333, 109336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2020.109336 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2020.109336
pubmed: 33248029
Gölz, L. et al. In vitro biocompatibility of ICON and TEGDMA on human dental pulp stem cells. Dent. Mater. 32, 1052–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.06.002 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.06.002
pubmed: 27323651
De Carvalho, R. V. et al. The influence of concentration of HEMA on degree of conversion and cytotoxicity of a dental bonding resin. Minerva Stomatol. 65, 65–71 (2016).
pubmed: 27009411
Jiang, R., Xu, Y., Wang, F. & Lin, H. Effectiveness and cytotoxicity of two desensitizing agents: A dentin permeability measurement and dentin barrier testing in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 22, 391. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02424-7 (2022).
doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02424-7
pubmed: 36088323
pmcid: 9464405
Pagano, S. et al. Biological effects of resin monomers on oral cell populations: Descriptive analysis of literature. Eur. J. Paediatr. Dent. 20, 224–232. https://doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2019.20.03.11 (2019).
doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2019.20.03.11
pubmed: 31489823
Cardoso, M. et al. Effects of Adper Scotchbond 1 XT, Clearfil SE Bond 2 and Scotchbond Universal in odontoblasts. Materials (Basel) 14, 6435. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216435 (2021).
doi: 10.3390/ma14216435
pubmed: 34771964
Zhao, X. & Ren, Y. F. Surface properties and color stability of resin-infiltrated enamel lesions. Oper. Dent. 41, 617–626. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-319-L (2016).
doi: 10.2341/15-319-L
pubmed: 27589273