3D motion analysis dataset of healthy young adult volunteers walking and running on overground and treadmill.


Journal

Scientific data
ISSN: 2052-4463
Titre abrégé: Sci Data
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101640192

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 May 2024
Historique:
received: 07 02 2024
accepted: 24 05 2024
medline: 31 5 2024
pubmed: 31 5 2024
entrez: 30 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Used on clinical and sportive context, three-dimensional motion analysis is considered as the gold standard in the biomechanics field. The proposed dataset has been established on 30 asymptomatic young participants. Volunteers were asked to walk at slow, comfortable and fast speeds, and to run at comfortable and fast speeds on overground and treadmill using shoes. Three dimensional trajectories of 63 reflective markers, 3D ground reaction forces and moments were simultaneously recorded. A total of 4840 and 18159 gait cycles were measured for overground and treadmill walking, respectively. Additionally, 2931 and 18945 cycles were measured for overground and treadmill running, respectively. The dataset is presented in C3D and CSV files either in raw or pre-processed format. The aim of this dataset is to provide a complete set of data that will help for the gait characterization during clinical gait analysis and in a sportive context. This data could be used for the creation of a baseline database for clinical purposes to research activities exploring the gait and the run.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38816523
doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03420-y
pii: 10.1038/s41597-024-03420-y
doi:

Types de publication

Dataset Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

556

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Lencioni, T., Carpinella, I., Rabuffetti, M., Marzegan, A. & Ferrarin, M. Human kinematic, kinetic and EMG data during different walking and stair ascending and descending tasks. Sci Data 6, 309 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0323-z pubmed: 31811148 pmcid: 6897988
Simon, S. R. Quantification of human motion: gait analysis—benefits and limitations to its application to clinical problems. Journal of Biomechanics 37, 1869–1880 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.047 pubmed: 15519595
Cimolin, V. & Galli, M. Summary measures for clinical gait analysis: A literature review. Gait & Posture 39, 1005–1010 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.02.001
Toro, B., Nester, C. & Farren, P. A review of observational gait assessment in clinical practice. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 19, 137–149 (2003).
doi: 10.1080/09593980307964
Armand, S., Moissenet, F., Coulon, G. de & Bonnefoy-Mazure, A. Identifying and understanding gait deviations: critical review and perspectives. Mov Sport Sci/Sci Mot 77–88 https://doi.org/10.1051/sm/2017016 (2017).
Baker, R., Esquenazi, A., Benedetti, M. G. & Desloovere, K. Gait analysis: clinical facts. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 52, 560–574 (2016).
pubmed: 27618499
Dugan, S. A. & Bhat, K. P. Biomechanics and Analysis of Running Gait. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America 16, 603–621 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2005.02.007 pubmed: 16005396
Ferber, R. & Macdonald, S. Running Mechanics and Gait Analysis. (Human Kinetics, 2014).
Bertaux, A. et al. Gait analysis dataset of healthy volunteers and patients before and 6 months after total hip arthroplasty. Sci Data 9, 399 (2022).
doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01483-3 pubmed: 35821499 pmcid: 9276684
Van Criekinge, T. et al. A full-body motion capture gait dataset of 138 able-bodied adults across the life span and 50 stroke survivors. Sci Data 10, 852 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02767-y pubmed: 38040770 pmcid: 10692332
Schreiber, C. & Moissenet, F. A multimodal dataset of human gait at different walking speeds established on injury-free adult participants. Sci Data 6, 111 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0124-4 pubmed: 31270327 pmcid: 6610108
van der Zee, T. J., Mundinger, E. M. & Kuo, A. D. A biomechanics dataset of healthy human walking at various speeds, step lengths and step widths. Sci Data 9, 704 (2022).
doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01817-1 pubmed: 36385009 pmcid: 9669008
Grouvel, G., Carcreff, L., Moissenet, F. & Armand, S. A dataset of asymptomatic human gait and movements obtained from markers, IMUs, insoles and force plates. Sci Data 10, 180 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02077-3 pubmed: 36997555 pmcid: 10063557
Mei, Q. et al. Dataset of lower extremity joint angles, moments and forces in distance running. Heliyon 8, e11517 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11517 pubmed: 36406689 pmcid: 9668536
Fukuchi, C. A., Fukuchi, R. K. & Duarte, M. Effects of walking speed on gait biomechanics in healthy participants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 8, 153 (2019).
doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1063-z pubmed: 31248456 pmcid: 6595586
Schwartz, M. H., Rozumalski, A. & Trost, J. P. The effect of walking speed on the gait of typically developing children. Journal of Biomechanics 41, 1639–1650 (2008).
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.03.015 pubmed: 18466909
Burnfield, J. M., Few, C. D., Mohamed, O. S. & Perry, J. The influence of walking speed and footwear on plantar pressures in older adults. Clinical Biomechanics 19, 78–84 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.09.007 pubmed: 14659934
Marrocco, S. et al. Knee loading patterns of the non-paretic and paretic legs during post-stroke gait. Gait & Posture 49, 297–302 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.07.019
Pinzone, O., Schwartz, M. H., Thomason, P. & Baker, R. The comparison of normative reference data from different gait analysis services. Gait Posture 40, 286–290 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.03.185 pubmed: 24831115
Van Hooren, B. et al. Is Motorized Treadmill Running Biomechanically Comparable to Overground Running? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Over Studies. Sports Med 50, 785–813 (2020).
doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01237-z pubmed: 31802395
Semaan, M. B. et al. Is treadmill walking biomechanically comparable to overground walking? A systematic review. Gait & Posture 92, 249–257 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.11.009
Riglet, L. et al. The Use of Embedded IMU Insoles to Assess Gait Parameters: A Validation and Test-Retest Reliability Study. Sensors 23, 8155 (2023).
doi: 10.3390/s23198155 pubmed: 37836986 pmcid: 10575241
Santuz, A. et al. Modular Control of Human Movement During Running: An Open Access Data Set. Front. Physiol. 9, (2018).
Josiński, H. et al. Assessment of Local Dynamic Stability in Gait Based on Univariate and Multivariate Time Series. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 2019, 1–13 (2019).
doi: 10.1155/2019/6917658
Baker, R., Leboeuf, F., Reay, J. & Sangeux, M. The Conventional Gait Model - Success and Limitations. in Handbook of Human Motion 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14418-4_25 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018).
Leboeuf, F. et al. The conventional gait model, an open-source implementation that reproduces the past but prepares for the future. Gait & Posture 69, 235–241 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.04.015
Halpern, A. I., Jansen, J. A. F., Giladi, N., Mirelman, A. & Hausdorff, J. M. Does Time of Day influence postural control and gait? A review of the literature. Gait & Posture 92, 153–166 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.10.023
Davis, R. B., Õunpuu, S., Tyburski, D. & Gage, J. R. A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Human Movement Science 10, 575–587 (1991).
doi: 10.1016/0167-9457(91)90046-Z
O’Connor, C. M., Thorpe, S. K., O’Malley, M. J. & Vaughan, C. L. Automatic detection of gait events using kinematic data. Gait & Posture 25, 469–474 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.05.016
Riglet, L. et al. 3D motion analysis dataset of healthy young adult volunteers walking and running on overground and treadmill, figshare, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7056797.v1 (2024).
Tong, K. & Granat, M. H. A practical gait analysis system using gyroscopes. Medical Engineering & Physics 21, 87–94 (1999).
Wiles, T. M. et al. NONAN GaitPrint: An IMU gait database of healthy young adults. Sci Data 10, 867 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02704-z pubmed: 38052819 pmcid: 10698035
Schulte, R. V. et al. Database of lower limb kinematics and electromyography during gait-related activities in able-bodied subjects. Sci Data 10, 461 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02341-6 pubmed: 37452137 pmcid: 10349036
Dimitrov, H., Bull, A. M. J. & Farina, D. High-density EMG, IMU, kinetic, and kinematic open-source data for comprehensive locomotion activities. Sci Data 10, 789 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02679-x pubmed: 37949938 pmcid: 10638431
Leardini, A. et al. A new anatomically based protocol for gait analysis in children. Gait & Posture 26, 560–571 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.12.018
Ferrari, A. et al. Quantitative comparison of five current protocols in gait analysis. Gait Posture 28, 207–216 (2008).
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.11.009 pubmed: 18206374
McGinley, J. L., Baker, R., Wolfe, R. & Morris, M. E. The reliability of three-dimensional kinematic gait measurements: A systematic review. Gait & Posture 29, 360–369 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.09.003
Stief, F., Böhm, H., Michel, K., Schwirtz, A. & Döderlein, L. Reliability and Accuracy in Three-Dimensional Gait Analysis: A Comparison of Two Lower Body Protocols. Journal of Applied Biomechanics 29, 105–111 (2013).
doi: 10.1123/jab.29.1.105 pubmed: 22813723
Kwon, J. W., Son, S. M. & Lee, N. K. Changes of kinematic parameters of lower extremities with gait speed: a 3D motion analysis study. J Phys Ther Sci 27, 477–479 (2015).
doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.477 pubmed: 25729195 pmcid: 4339165
Barre, A. & Armand, S. Biomechanical ToolKit: Open-source framework to visualize and process biomechanical data. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 114, 80–87 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.01.012 pubmed: 24548899

Auteurs

Louis Riglet (L)

INSERM, CIC 1432, Module Plurithématique, Plateforme d'Investigation Technologique, 21000, Dijon, France. louis.riglet@chu-dijon.fr.
CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, Module Plurithématique, Plateforme d'Investigation Technologique, 21000, Dijon, France. louis.riglet@chu-dijon.fr.

Corentin Delphin (C)

INSERM, CIC 1432, Module Plurithématique, Plateforme d'Investigation Technologique, 21000, Dijon, France.
CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, Module Plurithématique, Plateforme d'Investigation Technologique, 21000, Dijon, France.

Lauranne Claquesin (L)

INSERM, CIC 1432, Module Plurithématique, Plateforme d'Investigation Technologique, 21000, Dijon, France.
CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, Module Plurithématique, Plateforme d'Investigation Technologique, 21000, Dijon, France.

Baptiste Orliac (B)

INSERM, CIC 1432, Module Plurithématique, Plateforme d'Investigation Technologique, 21000, Dijon, France.
CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, Module Plurithématique, Plateforme d'Investigation Technologique, 21000, Dijon, France.

Paul Ornetti (P)

INSERM, CIC 1432, Module Plurithématique, Plateforme d'Investigation Technologique, 21000, Dijon, France.
CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, Module Plurithématique, Plateforme d'Investigation Technologique, 21000, Dijon, France.
INSERM, UMR1093-CAPS, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, UB, 21000, Dijon, France.
Rheumatology department, CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, 21000, Dijon, France.
Collaborative Research Network STARTER, Innovative Strategies and Artificial Intelligence for Motor Function Rehabilitation and Autonomy Preservation, 21000, Dijon, France.

Davy Laroche (D)

INSERM, CIC 1432, Module Plurithématique, Plateforme d'Investigation Technologique, 21000, Dijon, France.
CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, Module Plurithématique, Plateforme d'Investigation Technologique, 21000, Dijon, France.
INSERM, UMR1093-CAPS, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, UB, 21000, Dijon, France.
Collaborative Research Network STARTER, Innovative Strategies and Artificial Intelligence for Motor Function Rehabilitation and Autonomy Preservation, 21000, Dijon, France.

Mathieu Gueugnon (M)

INSERM, CIC 1432, Module Plurithématique, Plateforme d'Investigation Technologique, 21000, Dijon, France. mathieu.gueugnon@chu-dijon.fr.
CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, Module Plurithématique, Plateforme d'Investigation Technologique, 21000, Dijon, France. mathieu.gueugnon@chu-dijon.fr.
INSERM, UMR1093-CAPS, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, UB, 21000, Dijon, France. mathieu.gueugnon@chu-dijon.fr.
Collaborative Research Network STARTER, Innovative Strategies and Artificial Intelligence for Motor Function Rehabilitation and Autonomy Preservation, 21000, Dijon, France. mathieu.gueugnon@chu-dijon.fr.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH