TraumaFlow-development of a workflow-based clinical decision support system for the management of severe trauma cases.

BPMN 2.0 Clinical decision support Polytrauma Resuscitation room Workflow management

Journal

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery
ISSN: 1861-6429
Titre abrégé: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101499225

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 May 2024
Historique:
received: 09 01 2024
accepted: 16 05 2024
medline: 31 5 2024
pubmed: 31 5 2024
entrez: 30 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The treatment of severely injured patients in the resuscitation room of an emergency department requires numerous critical decisions, often under immense time pressure, which places very high demands on the facility and the interdisciplinary team. Computer-based cognitive aids are a valuable tool, especially in education and training of medical professionals. For the management of polytrauma cases, TraumaFlow, a workflow management-based clinical decision support system, was developed. The system supports the registration and coordination of activities in the resuscitation room and actively recommends diagnosis and treatment actions. Based on medical guidelines, a resuscitation room algorithm was developed according to the cABCDE scheme. The algorithm was then modeled using the process description language BPMN 2.0 and implemented in a workflow management system. In addition, a web-based user interface that provides assistance functions was developed. An evaluation study was conducted with 11 final-year medical students and three residents to assess the applicability of TraumaFlow in a case-based training scenario. TraumaFlow significantly improved guideline-based decision-making, provided more complete therapy, and reduced treatment errors. The system was shown to be beneficial not only for the education of low- and medium-experienced users but also for the training of highly experienced physicians. 92% of the participants felt more confident with computer-aided decision support and considered TraumaFlow useful for the training of polytrauma treatment. In addition, 62% acknowledged a higher training effect. TraumaFlow enables real-time decision support for the treatment of polytrauma patients. It improves guideline-based decision-making in complex and critical situations and reduces treatment errors. Supporting functions, such as the automatic treatment documentation and the calculation of medical scores, enable the trauma team to focus on the primary task. TraumaFlow was developed to support the training of medical students and experienced professionals. Each training session is documented and can be objectively and qualitatively evaluated.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38816648
doi: 10.1007/s11548-024-03191-2
pii: 10.1007/s11548-024-03191-2
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

World Health Organization (2020) Global health estimates 2020: Deaths by cause, age, sex, by country and by Region, 2000–2019. Geneva
Berkeveld E, Popal Z, Schober P, Zuidema WP, Bloemers FW, Giannakopoulos GF (2021) Prehospital time and mortality in polytrauma patients: a retrospective analysis. BMC Emerg Med 21:78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00476-6
doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00476-6 pubmed: 34229629 pmcid: 8261943
Wurmb TE, Frühwald P, Knuepffer J, Schuster F, Kredel M, Roewer N, Brederlau J (2008) Application of standard operating procedures accelerates the process of trauma care in patients with multiple injuries. Eur J Emerg Med 15:311. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0b013e3283036ce6
doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e3283036ce6 pubmed: 19078832
Fitzgerald M, Cameron P, Mackenzie C, Farrow N, Scicluna P, Gocentas R, Bystrzycki A, Lee G, O’Reilly G, Andrianopoulos N, Dziukas L, Cooper DJ, Silvers A, Mori A, Murray A, Smith S, Xiao Y, Stub D, McDermott FT, Rosenfeld JV (2011) Trauma resuscitation errors and computer-assisted decision support. Arch Surg Chic Ill 1960 146:218–225. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2010.333
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.333
Ji S-Y, Smith R, Huynh T, Najarian K (2009) A comparative analysis of multi-level computer-assisted decision making systems for traumatic injuries. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 9:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-9-2
doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-2 pubmed: 19144188 pmcid: 2661076
Georgiou A, Lockey DJ (2010) The performance and assessment of hospital trauma teams. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 18:66. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-18-66
doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-18-66 pubmed: 21144035 pmcid: 3017008
Committee on Trauma (2018) ATLS Advanced Trauma Life Support 10th Edition Student Course Manual. ACS American College of Surgeons
European Trauma Course Organisation (ETCO) European Trauma Course. In: Eur. Trauma Course ETC. https://www.europeantraumacourse.com . Accessed 9 Jan 2024
Navarro S, Montmany S, Rebasa P, Colilles C, Pallisera A (2014) Impact of ATLS training on preventable and potentially preventable deaths. World J Surg 38:2273–2278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2587-y
doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2587-y pubmed: 24770906
Ruchholtz S, Lefering R, Debus F, Mand C, Kühne C, Siebert H (2013) TraumaNetzwerk DGU® und TraumaRegister DGU®. Chir 84:730–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-013-2474-3
doi: 10.1007/s00104-013-2474-3
Vioque SM, Kim PK, McMaster J, Gallagher J, Allen SR, Holena DN, Reilly PM, Pascual JL (2014) Classifying errors in preventable and potentially preventable trauma deaths: a 9-year review using the Joint Commission’s standardized methodology. Am J Surg 208:187–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.02.006
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.02.006 pubmed: 24814306
Pucher PH, Aggarwal R, Twaij A, Batrick N, Jenkins M, Darzi A (2013) Identifying and addressing preventable process errors in trauma care. World J Surg 37:752–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-1917-9
doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1917-9 pubmed: 23340709
Kleber C, Giesecke MT, Tsokos M, Haas NP, Buschmann CT (2013) Trauma-related preventable deaths in Berlin 2010: need to change prehospital management strategies and trauma management education. World J Surg 37:1154–1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-1964-2
doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1964-2 pubmed: 23430005
Ondruschka B, Baier C, Dreßler J, Höch A, Bernhard M, Kleber C, Buschmann C (2017) Additional emergency medical measures in trauma-associated cardiac arrest. Anaesthesist 66:924–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-017-0383-4
doi: 10.1007/s00101-017-0383-4 pubmed: 29143074
Tsang B, McKee J, Engels PT, Paton-Gay D, Widder SL (2013) Compliance to advanced trauma life support protocols in adult trauma patients in the acute setting. World J Emerg Surg 8:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-8-39
doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-8-39 pubmed: 24088362 pmcid: 3851478
Spanjersberg WR, Bergs EA, Mushkudiani N, Klimek M, Schipper IB (2009) Protocol compliance and time management in blunt trauma resuscitation. Emerg Med J 26:23–27. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2008.058073
doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.058073 pubmed: 19104091
Sucher JF, Moore FA, Todd SR, Sailors RM, McKinley BA (2008) Computerized clinical decision support: a technology to implement and validate evidence based guidelines. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 64:520. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181601812
doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181601812
Greig PR, Zolger D, Onwochei DN, Thurley N, Higham H, Desai N (2023) Cognitive aids in the management of clinical emergencies: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15939
doi: 10.1111/anae.15939 pubmed: 36862033
Webber B, Clarke J, Niv M, Rymon R, Ibáñez M (1990) TraumAID: Reasoning and Planning in the Initial Definitive Management of Multiple Injuries. Tech Rep CIS
Clarke JR, Hayward CZ, Santora TA, Wagner DK, Webber BL (2002) Computer-generated trauma management plans: comparison with actual care. World J Surg 26:536–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-001-0263-5
doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0263-5 pubmed: 12098040
Ogunyemi O, Clarke JR, Webber B, Badler N (2000) TraumaSCAN: assessing penetrating trauma with geometric and probabilistic reasoning. Proc AMIA Symp 620–624
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie e.V. (DGU) S3-Leitlinie Polytrauma / Schwerverletzten-Behandlung (Version 4.1). https://register.awmf.org/de/leitlinien/detail/187-023 . Accessed 18 Dec 2023
AUC - Akademie der Unfallchirurgie GmbH Das TraumaRegister DGU®. https://www.auc-online.de/unsere-angebote/medizinische-register/traumaregister-dgu/ . Accessed 18 Dec 2023
Object Management Group Business Process Model & Notation (BPMN
Object Management Group Decision Model and Notation (DMN
Flowable AG The Flowable Project (Open Source). https://www.flowable.com/open-source . Accessed 19 Dec 2023
Vogel C, Neumann J, Kießling L, Hempel G, Neumuth T, Kleber C, Osterhoff G (2023) In vitro evaluation of a computer-assisted decision support system for the primary care of polytrauma patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02295-9
doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02295-9 pubmed: 37289225 pmcid: 10520084
Schrepp M, Hinderks A, Thomaschewski J (2014) Applying the user experience questionnaire (UEQ) in different evaluation scenarios. In: Marcus A (ed) Design, user experience, and usability. Theories, methods, and tools for designing the user experience. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 383–392
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07668-3_37
Antoniadi AM, Du Y, Guendouz Y, Wei L, Mazo C, Becker BA, Mooney C (2021) Current challenges and future opportunities for XAI in machine learning-based clinical decision support systems: a systematic review. Appl Sci 11:5088. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115088
doi: 10.3390/app11115088
Huber-Wagner S, Biberthaler P, Häberle S, Wierer M, Dobritz M, Rummeny E, van Griensven M, Kanz K-G, Lefering R, TraumaRegister DGU (2013) Whole-body CT in haemodynamically unstable severely injured patients–a retrospective, multicentre study. PLoS One 8:e68880. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068880
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068880 pubmed: 23894365 pmcid: 3722202
Hecht Ii CJ, Porto JR, Sanghvi PA, Homma Y, Sculco PK, Kamath AF (2024) Navigating the learning curve: assessing caseload and comparing outcomes before and after the learning curve of computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty. J Robot Surg 18:104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-01855-4
doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01855-4 pubmed: 38430388 pmcid: 10908601

Auteurs

Juliane Neumann (J)

Innovation Center Computer-Assisted Surgery (ICCAS), Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany. Juliane.Neumann@iccas.de.

Christoph Vogel (C)

Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Lisa Kießling (L)

Innovation Center Computer-Assisted Surgery (ICCAS), Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Gunther Hempel (G)

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Christian Kleber (C)

Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Georg Osterhoff (G)

Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Thomas Neumuth (T)

Innovation Center Computer-Assisted Surgery (ICCAS), Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Classifications MeSH