Assessment of fever screening at airports in detecting domestic passengers infected with SARS-CoV-2, 2020-2022, Okinawa prefecture, Japan.
Airport
COVID-19
Fever screening
Prevention
Journal
BMC infectious diseases
ISSN: 1471-2334
Titre abrégé: BMC Infect Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968551
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 May 2024
30 May 2024
Historique:
received:
11
08
2023
accepted:
23
05
2024
medline:
31
5
2024
pubmed:
31
5
2024
entrez:
30
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
While airport screening measures for COVID-19 infected passengers at international airports worldwide have been greatly relaxed, observational studies evaluating fever screening alone at airports remain scarce. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively assess the effectiveness of fever screening at airports in preventing the influx of COVID-19 infected persons. We conducted a retrospective epidemiological analysis of fever screening implemented at 9 airports in Okinawa Prefecture from May 2020 to March 2022. The number of passengers covered during the same period was 9,003,616 arriving at 9 airports in Okinawa Prefecture and 5,712,983 departing passengers at Naha Airport. The capture rate was defined as the proportion of reported COVID-19 cases who would have passed through airport screening to the number of suspected cases through fever screening at the airport, and this calculation used passengers arriving at Naha Airport and surveillance data collected by Okinawa Prefecture between May 2020 and March 2021. From May 2020 to March 2021, 4.09 million people were reported to pass through airports in Okinawa. During the same period, at least 122 people with COVID-19 infection arrived at the airports in Okinawa, but only a 10 suspected cases were detected; therefore, the capture rate is estimated to be up to 8.2% (95% CI: 4.00-14.56%). Our result of a fever screening rate is 0.0002% (95%CI: 0.0003-0.0006%) (10 suspected cases /2,971,198 arriving passengers). The refusal rate of passengers detected by thermography who did not respond to temperature measurements was 0.70% (95% CI: 0.19-1.78%) (4 passengers/572 passengers). This study revealed that airport screening based on thermography alone missed over 90% of COVID-19 infected cases, indicating that thermography screening may be ineffective as a border control measure. The fact that only 10 febrile cases were detected after screening approximately 3 million passengers suggests the need to introduce measures targeting asymptomatic infections, especially with long incubation periods. Therefore, other countermeasures, e.g. preboarding RT-PCR testing, are highly recommended during an epidemic satisfying World Health Organization (WHO) Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) criteria with pathogen characteristics similar or exceeding SARS-CoV-2, especially when traveling to rural cities with limited medical resources.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
While airport screening measures for COVID-19 infected passengers at international airports worldwide have been greatly relaxed, observational studies evaluating fever screening alone at airports remain scarce. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively assess the effectiveness of fever screening at airports in preventing the influx of COVID-19 infected persons.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a retrospective epidemiological analysis of fever screening implemented at 9 airports in Okinawa Prefecture from May 2020 to March 2022. The number of passengers covered during the same period was 9,003,616 arriving at 9 airports in Okinawa Prefecture and 5,712,983 departing passengers at Naha Airport. The capture rate was defined as the proportion of reported COVID-19 cases who would have passed through airport screening to the number of suspected cases through fever screening at the airport, and this calculation used passengers arriving at Naha Airport and surveillance data collected by Okinawa Prefecture between May 2020 and March 2021.
RESULTS
RESULTS
From May 2020 to March 2021, 4.09 million people were reported to pass through airports in Okinawa. During the same period, at least 122 people with COVID-19 infection arrived at the airports in Okinawa, but only a 10 suspected cases were detected; therefore, the capture rate is estimated to be up to 8.2% (95% CI: 4.00-14.56%). Our result of a fever screening rate is 0.0002% (95%CI: 0.0003-0.0006%) (10 suspected cases /2,971,198 arriving passengers). The refusal rate of passengers detected by thermography who did not respond to temperature measurements was 0.70% (95% CI: 0.19-1.78%) (4 passengers/572 passengers).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study revealed that airport screening based on thermography alone missed over 90% of COVID-19 infected cases, indicating that thermography screening may be ineffective as a border control measure. The fact that only 10 febrile cases were detected after screening approximately 3 million passengers suggests the need to introduce measures targeting asymptomatic infections, especially with long incubation periods. Therefore, other countermeasures, e.g. preboarding RT-PCR testing, are highly recommended during an epidemic satisfying World Health Organization (WHO) Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) criteria with pathogen characteristics similar or exceeding SARS-CoV-2, especially when traveling to rural cities with limited medical resources.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38816697
doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09427-5
pii: 10.1186/s12879-024-09427-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
542Subventions
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 21K10416
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 21K17250
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 20H03940
Organisme : Japan Science and Technology Agency
ID : JPMJCR20H1
Organisme : Japan Science and Technology Agency
ID : JPMJSC21U4
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Aidan Findlater, Isaac I, Bogoch. Human mobility and the global spread of infectious diseases: a focus on Air Travel. Trends Parasitol. 2018;34(9):772–83.
doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2018.07.004
COVID-19. Current Japanese Border Measures, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. [cited 2023 July/6] https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/covid-19/bordercontrol.html
World Health Organization. Statement on the fifteenth meeting of the IHR. (2005) Emergency Committee on the COVID-19 pandemic. 5 May 2023. [cited 2023 July/6] https://www.who.int/news/item/05-05-2023-statement-on-the-fifteenth-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-pandemic
Normile D. Airport screening is largely futile, research shows. Science. 2020;367:1177–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.367.6483.1177
doi: 10.1126/science.367.6483.1177
pubmed: 32165563
Dollard P, Griffin I, Berro A, Cohen NJ, Singler K, Haber Y, et al. Risk Assessment and Management of COVID-19 among travelers arriving at designated U.S. airports, January 17-September 13, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(45):1681–5. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6945a4
doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6945a4
pubmed: 33180758
pmcid: 7660668
Billy J, Quilty S Clifford, CMMID nCoV working group; Stefan Flasche, Rosalind M, Eggo. Euro Surveill. Effectiveness of airport screening at detecting travellers infected with novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). 2020;25(5):2000080. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917
Nishiura H, Kamiya K. Fever screening during the influenza (H1N1-2009) pandemic at Narita International Airport, Japan. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:111. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-111
doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-111
pubmed: 21539735
pmcid: 3096599
Praveena J, Gunaratnam S, Tobin H, Seale A, Marich, Jeremy McAnulty. Airport arrivals screening during pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza in New South Wales, Australia. Med J Aust. 2014;200(5):290–2. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja13.10832
doi: 10.5694/mja13.10832
Sakaguchi H, Tsunoda M, Wada K, Ohta H, Kawashima M, Yoshino Y, Aizawa Y. Assessment of border control measures and community containment measures used in Japan during the early stages of pandemic (H1N1) 2009. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(2):e31289. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031289
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031289
pubmed: 22355354
pmcid: 3280294
Takayama Y, Mizumoto K, Omori R, Yamamoto T. Implementation of SARS-CoV-2 monitoring and screening test using RT-PCR in Okinawa prefecture, Japan. Jxiv (Preprint). 2021. https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.5
doi: 10.51094/jxiv.5
Airport, List. Japan. Ministory of Land, Infrastructure, Transpport and Tourism. Japan. [cited 2023 July/6] https://www.mlit.go.jp/koku/15_bf_000310.html (In Japanese).
Report AMS. 2019. Ministory of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. Japan. [cited 2023 July/6] https://www.mlit.go.jp/koku/15_bf_000185.html (In Japanese).
2019. (Naha Port Statistics. Japan, Corrected Version. December 2022) [cited 2023 July/6] https://nahaport.jp/userfiles/files/00teiseitoukei2019_1.pdf (In Japanese).
Number of visitors. Ishigaki City, Japan. [cited 2023 July/6] https://www.city.ishigaki.okinawa.jp/soshiki/kanko_bunka/survey_statistic/4166.html (In Japanese).
Promotion Plan to Attract Overseas Visitors by Region, Market C. Fiscal Year 2019, Okinawa Convention & Visitors Bureau (OCVB), Okinawa, Japan. https://www.ocvb.or.jp/pages/data/H31_cruisepromotion.pdf (In Japanese).
Tourism survey. 2018 Edition, Okinawa Prefecture, Japan. [cited 2023 July/6] https://www.pref.okinawa.lg.jp/site/bunka-sports/kankoseisaku/kikaku/report/youran/h30kankoyoran.html (In Japanese).
Mizumoto K, Chowell G. Transmission potential of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) onboard the diamond Princess cruises Ship, 2020. Infect Dis Model. 2020;5:264–70.
pubmed: 32190785
pmcid: 7068636
Maeda H, Sando E, Toizumi M, Arima Y, Shimada T, Tanaka T, et al. Epidemiology of Coronavirus Disease Outbreak among crewmembers on cruise ship, Nagasaki City, Japan, April 2020. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27(9):2251–60. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2709.204596
doi: 10.3201/eid2709.204596
pubmed: 34423761
pmcid: 8386778
Resume accepting international cruises. Press Release. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transpport and Tourism. Japan. [cited 2023 July/6] https://www.mlit.go.jp/report/press/content/001571751.pdf (In Japanese).
International Cruise Ship Arrives in Okinawa for the First Time in Three Years Ishigaki City. March 8, 2023. Ryukyushimpo, Japan. [cited 2023 July/6] https://ryukyushimpo.jp/news/entry-1674064.html (In Japanese).
Summary of Okinawa Prefecture Visitors Statistics for the calendar year 2019. Okinawa Prefecture, Japan. [cited 2023 July/6] https://www.pref.okinawa.jp/site/bunka-sports/kankoseisaku/kikaku/statistics/tourists/documents/r1_reki_gaikyou.pdf (In Japanese).
Hawaii T, Authority USA. [cited 2023 July/6] https://www.hawaiitourismauthority.org/media/4166/2020-01-29-hawaii-visitor-statistics-released-for-december-2019.pdf (In Japanese).
Japan Meteorological Agency. [cited 2023 July/6] https://www.jma.go.jp/jma/index.html (In Japanese).
Galmiche S, Cortier T, Charmet T, Schaeffer L, Chény O. Platenet Cv, al. SARS-CoV-2 incubation period across variants of concern, individual factors, and circumstances of infection in France: a case series analysis from the ComCor study. Lancet Microbe. 2023;4(6):e409–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00005-8
doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00005-8
pubmed: 37084751
pmcid: 10112864
Zeng K, Santhya S, Soong A, Malhotra N, Pushparajah D, Thoonet KC. Serial intervals and incubation periods of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta Variants, Singapore. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29(4):814–7. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2904.220854
doi: 10.3201/eid2904.220854
pubmed: 36878009
pmcid: 10045676
Okinawa Prefecture Declaration of Medical Emergency (Period: July 21. 2022 - September 29, 2022), September 29, 2022. [cited 2023 July/6] https://www.pref.okinawa.jp/site/chijiko/koho/corona/220721-emergency.html (In Japanese).
Tourism survey. 2020 Edition, Okinawa Prefecture, Japan. [cited 2023 July/6] https://www.pref.okinawa.jp/site/bunka-sports/kankoseisaku/kikaku/report/youran/r1kankoyoran.html (In Japanese).
Tourism survey. 2021 Edition, Okinawa Prefecture, Japan. [cited 2023 July/6] https://www.pref.okinawa.jp/site/bunka-sports/kankoseisaku/kikaku/report/youran/r2kankoyoran.html (In Japanese).
Military US. and Self-Defense Forces Bases in Okinawa (Statistical Data Book), Okinawa Prefecture. July 2022. [cited 2023 July/6] https://www.pref.okinawa.lg.jp/site/chijiko/kichitai/documents/kitinojyoukyou.pdf (The number of military personnel, civilians, and their families is based on interviews with U.S. forces on Okinawa (not provided from 2010 and 2012 to 2021).) (In Japanese).
Mizumoto K, Kagaya K, Zarebski A. Chowell G: Estimating the asymptomatic proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases on board the Diamond Princess cruise ship, Yokohama, Japan, 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(10).
Naha Airport. Thermography installation and monitoring project. Okinawa Prefecture, Japan. [cited 2023 December/23]. https://www.pref.okinawa.lg.jp/site/kikaku/chosei/documents/kikakubu.xlsx (In Japanese)