Relationships between body condition score, body weight and body measurements in alpacas.
Journal
Irish veterinary journal
ISSN: 2046-0481
Titre abrégé: Ir Vet J
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 0100762
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 May 2024
30 May 2024
Historique:
received:
04
03
2024
accepted:
20
05
2024
medline:
31
5
2024
pubmed:
31
5
2024
entrez:
30
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The nutritional status in alpacas is often masked by their dense fibre coat. Its assessment is commonly approached by different body condition scores (BCS) that rely on manual palpation of defined anatomical regions. However, BCS is an important diagnostic tool to aid recognition of diseased South American camelids (SACs) and low BCS has been associated with conditions like anaemia and neutrophilia. For dose-dependent veterinary treatment, body weight (BW), that should be as accurate as possible, is required. As on-site weighing with scales is often not possible, BW can mostly only be roughly estimated. To date, it remains unclear whether BCS in alpacas provides reliable information on BW or the ratios of BW to body length commonly known as Body Mass Index (BMI) or Ponderal Index (PI). Equations to estimate BW based on body measurements are available in the literature. Nonetheless, respective equations were developed in growing alpacas or adult llamas and BCS was not included. To compare six different BCS approaches and to examine the relationship between BCS and BW, body measurements and BCS scores were recorded in a herd of 105 alpacas. The examined BCS approaches showed significant (p < 0.05) but poor to moderate positive correlations to BW, BMI or PI. A solely visual inspection of BCS, in contrast, was not correlated with BW, BMI or PI. Equations previously developed in other studies provided an accurate estimation of BW. Multiple linear regression showed that the accuracy in predicting BW could be further increased by adding BCS data and sex. Our observations indicate that most selected BCS approaches are not only important measures of nutritional status but can also be used to create more accurate models for BW calculation in alpacas. The study also supports the claim that a purely visual inspection of alpacas is not an adequate method to evaluate the nutritional status of these animals.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The nutritional status in alpacas is often masked by their dense fibre coat. Its assessment is commonly approached by different body condition scores (BCS) that rely on manual palpation of defined anatomical regions. However, BCS is an important diagnostic tool to aid recognition of diseased South American camelids (SACs) and low BCS has been associated with conditions like anaemia and neutrophilia. For dose-dependent veterinary treatment, body weight (BW), that should be as accurate as possible, is required. As on-site weighing with scales is often not possible, BW can mostly only be roughly estimated. To date, it remains unclear whether BCS in alpacas provides reliable information on BW or the ratios of BW to body length commonly known as Body Mass Index (BMI) or Ponderal Index (PI). Equations to estimate BW based on body measurements are available in the literature. Nonetheless, respective equations were developed in growing alpacas or adult llamas and BCS was not included.
RESULTS
RESULTS
To compare six different BCS approaches and to examine the relationship between BCS and BW, body measurements and BCS scores were recorded in a herd of 105 alpacas. The examined BCS approaches showed significant (p < 0.05) but poor to moderate positive correlations to BW, BMI or PI. A solely visual inspection of BCS, in contrast, was not correlated with BW, BMI or PI. Equations previously developed in other studies provided an accurate estimation of BW. Multiple linear regression showed that the accuracy in predicting BW could be further increased by adding BCS data and sex.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our observations indicate that most selected BCS approaches are not only important measures of nutritional status but can also be used to create more accurate models for BW calculation in alpacas. The study also supports the claim that a purely visual inspection of alpacas is not an adequate method to evaluate the nutritional status of these animals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38816833
doi: 10.1186/s13620-024-00274-z
pii: 10.1186/s13620-024-00274-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
11Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Neubert S, von Altrock A, Wendt M, Wagener MG. Llama and Alpaca Management in Germany-results of an online survey among owners on farm structure, health problems and self-reflection. Animals (Basel). 2021;11(1):102. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010102 .
doi: 10.3390/ani11010102
Franz S, Wittek T, Joachim A, Hinney B, Dadak AM. Llamas and alpacas in Europe: endoparasites of the digestive tract and their pharmacotherapeutic control. Vet J. 2015;204(3):255–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.04.019 .
doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.04.019
pubmed: 25933827
Ballweber LR. Ecto- and endoparasites of new world camelids. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2009;25(2):295–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2009.02.003 .
doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2009.02.003
pubmed: 19460641
Lakritz J. Toxicology. In: Niehaus AJ, editor. Medicine and surgery of camelids. New Jersey: Wiley; 2022. pp. 590–620. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119583295.ch22 .
doi: 10.1002/9781119583295.ch22
Gorniak W, Wieliczko M, Soroko M, Korczynski M. Evaluation of the Accuracy of Horse Body Weight Estimation methods. Animals (Basel). 2020;10(10):1750. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101750 .
doi: 10.3390/ani10101750
Carroll CL, Huntington PJ. Body condition scoring and weight estimation of horses. Equine Vet J. 1988;20(1):41–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1988.tb01451.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1988.tb01451.x
pubmed: 3366105
Ellis JM, Hollands T. Accuracy of different methods of estimating the weight of horses. Vet Rec. 1998;143(12):335–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.143.12.335 .
doi: 10.1136/vr.143.12.335
pubmed: 9795403
Pearson RA, Ouassat M. Estimation of the liveweight and body condition of working donkeys in Morocco. Vet Rec. 1996;138(10):229–33. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.138.10.229 .
doi: 10.1136/vr.138.10.229
pubmed: 8686139
Sherwin V, Hyde R, Green M, Remnant J, Payne E, Down P. Accuracy of heart girth tapes in the estimation of weights of pre-weaned calves. Vet Rec Open. 2021;8(1):e16. https://doi.org/10.1002/vro2.16 .
doi: 10.1002/vro2.16
pubmed: 34401192
pmcid: 8349223
Fonseca P, Alves E, Passini R. Evaluation of covering materials in individual shelters and its effects on physiological responses and performance of dairy calves. Eng Agríc. 2012;32:1041–7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162012000600005 .
doi: 10.1590/S0100-69162012000600005
Grund S, Vogel M, Mülling C. Morphometric evaluation of the growth of Alpacas (Vicugna pacos) from birth to 36 months of age. Small Rumin Res. 2018;166:61–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.07.013 .
doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.07.013
Riek A, Gerken M. Measurements of the bodyweight and other physical characteristics of 11 llamas (Lama glama) from birth to weaning. Vet Rec. 2007;161(15):520–3. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.161.15.520 .
doi: 10.1136/vr.161.15.520
pubmed: 17938410
Leon JB, Smith BB, Timm KI. Growth characteristics of the llama (Lama glama) from birth to 12 months old. Vet Rec. 1989;125(26–27):644–5.
pubmed: 2617815
Smith BB, Timm KI, Reed PJ. Morphometric evaluation of growth in llamas (Lama glama) from birth to maturity. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1992;200(8):1095–100.
doi: 10.2460/javma.1992.200.08.1095
pubmed: 1607314
Wurzinger M, Delgado J, Nürnberg M, Zárate A, Stemmer A, Ugarte G, et al. Growth curves and genetic parameters for growth traits in Bolivian llamas. Livest Prod Sci. 2005;95:73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.12.015 .
doi: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.12.015
Ablondi M, Sabbioni A, Esposito G, Beretti V, Asti V. Body measures, growth curves and body weight prevision of alpacas (Vicugna pacos) reared in Italy. Ital J Anim Sci. 2023;22(1):1196–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2023.2273982 .
doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2023.2273982
Wagener MG, Schregel J, Ossowski N, Trojakowska A, Ganter M, Kiene F. The influence of different examiners on the body Condition score (BCS) in south American camelids-experiences from a mixed llama and alpaca herd. Front Vet Sci. 2023;10:1126399. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1126399 .
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1126399
pubmed: 36816196
pmcid: 9936059
Hilton CD, Pugh DG, Wright JC, Waldridge BM, Simpkins SA. Heath. How to determine and when to use body weight estimates and condition scores in llamas. Vet Med. 1998;93(11):1015–8.
Johnson LW. Update. Llama Nutrition. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1994;10(2):187–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0720(15)30554-5 .
doi: 10.1016/S0749-0720(15)30554-5
pubmed: 7953953
Van Saun RJ. Feeding and Nutrition. In: Niehaus AJ, editor. Medicine and surgery of camelids. New Jersey: Wiley; 2022. pp. 55–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119583295.ch3 .
doi: 10.1002/9781119583295.ch3
Pearson W, Wood K, Stanley S, MacNicol J. Exploring relationships between body condition score, body fat, activity level and inflammatory biomarkers. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2018;102(4):1062–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12893 .
doi: 10.1111/jpn.12893
pubmed: 29707811
Salazar-Cuytun E, Chay-Canul A, Ptáček M, García-Herrera R, De F, Rivera-Alegría F, et al. Relationship between body mass index and body condition score in Pelibuey ewes. Ecosistemas Y Recursos Agropecuarios. 2020;7(2):00. https://doi.org/10.19136/era.a7n2.2474 .
doi: 10.19136/era.a7n2.2474
Dorsten CM, Cooper DM. Use of body condition scoring to manage body weight in dogs. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 2004;43(3):34–7.
pubmed: 15174815
Wagener MG, Neubert S, Punsmann TM, Wiegand SB, Ganter M. Relationships between Body Condition score (BCS), FAMACHA©-Score and haematological parameters in Alpacas (Vicugna pacos), and Llamas (Lama glama) presented at the Veterinary Clinic. Animals (Basel). 2021;11(9):2517. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092517 .
doi: 10.3390/ani11092517
Ryan E, Dwyer P, Connolly D, Fagan J, Costello E, More S. Tuberculosis in alpaca (Lama pacos) on a farm in Ireland. 1. A clinical report. Ir Vet J. 2008;61(8):527–31. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-0481-61-8-527 .
doi: 10.1186/2046-0481-61-8-527
pubmed: 21851719
pmcid: 3113877
Connolly D, Dwyer P, Fagan J, Hayes M, Ryan E, Costello E, et al. Tuberculosis in alpaca (Lama pacos) on a farm in Ireland. 2. Results of an epidemiological investigation. Ir Vet J. 2008;61(8):533–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-0481-61-8-533 .
doi: 10.1186/2046-0481-61-8-533
pubmed: 21851720
pmcid: 3113878
Hales J, Moustsen VA, Nielsen MB, Hansen CF. Individual physical characteristics of neonatal piglets affect preweaning survival of piglets born in a noncrated system. J Anim Sci. 2013;91(10):4991–5003. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5740 .
doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5740
pubmed: 24078619
Gootwine E. Meta-analysis of morphometric parameters of late-gestation fetal sheep developed under natural and artificial constraints. J Anim Sci. 2013;91(1):111–9. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-5363 .
doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-5363
pubmed: 23404988
Smith NA, McAuliffe FM, Quinn K, Lonergan P, Evans ACO. Effect of high-glycaemic meals in the last trimester of pregnancy on offspring birth weight and postnatal growth in sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 2008;67(OCE9):E428. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665108009646 .
Barrier AC, Mason C, Dwyer CM, Haskell MJ, Macrae AI. Stillbirth in dairy calves is influenced independently by dystocia and body shape. Vet J. 2013;197(2):220–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.12.019 .
doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.12.019
pubmed: 23380229
Wichman LG, Redifer CA, Rathert-Williams AR, Duncan NB, Payne CA, Meyer AM. Effects of spring- versus fall-calving on perinatal nutrient availability and neonatal vigor in beef cattle. Transl Anim Sci. 2022;6(4):txac136. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac136 .
doi: 10.1093/tas/txac136
pubmed: 36381953
pmcid: 9661251
Chaibou M, Faye B, Lapeyronie P. Biomass production of natural courses in arid lands and their valorisation by the camels. Livest Res Rural Dev. 2011;23:174.
Team RC. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2021.
Royston P, Remark AS, R94: A Remark on Algorithm AS 181: The W-test for Normality. J R, Stat Soc Series C. (Applied Statistics). 1995;44(4):547 – 51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2986146 .
Frank E. Harrell Jr. Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. 2023.
Akoglu H. User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turk J Emerg Med. 2018;18(3):91–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001 .
doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001
pubmed: 30191186
pmcid: 6107969
Dunn OJ. Multiple comparisons using Rank sums. Technometrics. 1964;6(3):241–52.
doi: 10.1080/00401706.1964.10490181
Barton K, Barton MK. Package ‘mumin’. Version. 2015;1(18):439.
John Fox and Sanford Weisberg. An {R} companion to Applied Regression. Sage; 2019.
Petrie A, Watson P. Statistics for Veterinary and Animal Science. New Jersey: Wiley; 2013.
Breusch TS, Pagan AR. A simple test for heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation. Econometrica. 1979;47(5):1287–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911963 .
doi: 10.2307/1911963
Wald A. Tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number of observations is large. Trans Amer Math Soc. 1943;54(3):426–82.
doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1943-0012401-3
Ludden TM, Beal SL, Sheiner LB. Comparison of the Akaike Information Criterion, the Schwarz criterion and the F test as guides to model selection. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1994;22(5):431–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353864 .
doi: 10.1007/BF02353864
pubmed: 7791040
Lawrence IKL. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989;45(1):255–.68 https://doi.org/10.2307/2532051 .
doi: 10.2307/2532051
Wagener MG, Ganter M, Leonhard-Marek S. Body condition scoring in alpacas (Vicugna pacos) and llamas (Lama glama) – a scoping review. Vet Res Commun. 2024;48(2):665–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-023-10275-y .
doi: 10.1007/s11259-023-10275-y
pubmed: 38133845
Neubert S, Puff C, Kleinschmidt S, Kammeyer P, von Altrock A, Wendt M, et al. Pathological findings in south American camelids presented at a farm animal clinic in Northern Germany (2005–2021). Vet Res Commun. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-024-10369-1 .
doi: 10.1007/s11259-024-10369-1
pubmed: 38630427
Gauly MVJ, Cebra C, Gerken M. Fütterung. In: Gauly M, editor. Neuweltkameliden Haltung, Zucht, Erkrankungen 4th Edition. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2018. pp. 46–68. https://doi.org/10.1055/b-0038-151494 .
doi: 10.1055/b-0038-151494
McConnell THE. Farm Assessment and Diagnosis. The complete Alpaca book, 2nd Edion. Santa Cruz, California: Bonny Doon Press; 2006. pp. 415–26.
Storey BE, Williamson LH, Howell SB, Terrill TH, Berghaus R, Vidyashankar AN, et al. Validation of the FAMACHA© system in South American camelids. Vet Parasitol. 2017;85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.06.004 .
Proost K, Pardon B, Pollaris E, Flahou T, Vlaminck L. Dental disease in alpacas. Part 1: prevalence of dental disorders and their mutual relationships. J Vet Intern Med. 2020;34(2):1028–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15741 .
doi: 10.1111/jvim.15741
pubmed: 32107866
pmcid: 7096633
Proost K, Pardon B, Pollaris E, Flahou T, Vlaminck L. Dental disease in alpacas. Part 2: risk factors associated with diastemata, periodontitis, occlusal pulp exposure, wear abnormalities, and malpositioned teeth. J Vet Intern Med. 2020;34(2):1039–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15740 .
doi: 10.1111/jvim.15740
pubmed: 32108969
pmcid: 7096605
Bennett MM. South American Camelid Behavior and the CAMELIDynamics Approach to Handling. In: Niehaus AJ, editor. Medicine and surgery of camelids. New Jersey: Wiley; 2022. pp. 19–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119583295.ch2 .
doi: 10.1002/9781119583295.ch2
Bjørnvad CR, Gloor S, Johansen SS, Sandøe P, Lund TB. Neutering increases the risk of obesity in male dogs but not in bitches — a cross-sectional study of dog- and owner-related risk factors for obesity in Danish companion dogs. Prev Vet Med. 2019;170:104730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104730 .
doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104730
pubmed: 31421500
Wallis NJ, Sumanasekera NT, Raffan E. Obesity risk factors in British Labrador retrievers: Effect of sex, neuter status, age, chocolate coat colour and food motivation. Vet Rec. 2024;194(6):e3410. https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.3410 .
doi: 10.1002/vetr.3410
pubmed: 37747436
Scott KC, Levy JK, Gorman SP, Newell SM. Body condition of feral cats and the effect of neutering. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2002;5(3):203–13. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327604JAWS0503_04 .
doi: 10.1207/S15327604JAWS0503_04
pubmed: 12578741
Jensen RB, Danielsen SH, Tauson A-H. Body condition score, morphometric measurements and estimation of body weight in mature Icelandic horses in Denmark. Acta Vet Scand. 2016;58(1):59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-016-0240-5 .
doi: 10.1186/s13028-016-0240-5
pubmed: 27766968
pmcid: 5073991
Haddad S, Beni-Domi M, Sweidan R. Effects of castration on growth performance and carcass characteristics of Awassi lambs fed high concentrate diet. Small Rumin Res. 2006;65(1–2):149–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.05.029 .
doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.05.029