Self-assessed outcomes following double fascicular nerve transfer for elbow flexion.

brachial plexus injury nerve transfer surgery patient-reported outcomes

Journal

Shoulder & elbow
ISSN: 1758-5732
Titre abrégé: Shoulder Elbow
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101506589

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 02 03 2022
accepted: 27 06 2022
pmc-release: 01 07 2025
medline: 31 5 2024
pubmed: 31 5 2024
entrez: 31 5 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Double fascicular nerve transfer (DFT) is often performed to re-animate the elbow flexors. Studies of motor recovery following this surgery have exclusively reported on the objective outcome of muscle power. Questionnaire studies allow researchers and clinicians to learn from patients and better direct care towards their needs. To date, no research has focused on self-assessed recovery following DFT for elbow flexion. This observational cross-sectional study aimed to give an account of patient-assessed outcomes following DFT. The bespoke questionnaire included: (a) self-reported strength and (b) the Stanmore percentage of normal elbow assessment. Sixty-two patients participated in the study. Participants were grouped according to time post-surgery. Statistical analysis confirmed that data were comparable between groups ( Median scores were 0.5 kg <2 years post-surgery, 3 kg at 2 to 5 years, 2 kg at 5 to 8 years and 1.3 kg in the >8 years group. Mean scores (%) were 35 (SD ± 25) <2 years, 56 (SD ± 31) at 2 to 5 years, 44 (SD ± 25) at 5 to 8 years and 46 (SD ± 29) >8 years groups. This is the first study of self-assessed recovery following DFT. Scores peaked around 4 years post-operation. Future research should focus on the long-term self-reported outcome of nerve transfer surgery.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Double fascicular nerve transfer (DFT) is often performed to re-animate the elbow flexors. Studies of motor recovery following this surgery have exclusively reported on the objective outcome of muscle power. Questionnaire studies allow researchers and clinicians to learn from patients and better direct care towards their needs. To date, no research has focused on self-assessed recovery following DFT for elbow flexion.
Methods UNASSIGNED
This observational cross-sectional study aimed to give an account of patient-assessed outcomes following DFT. The bespoke questionnaire included: (a) self-reported strength and (b) the Stanmore percentage of normal elbow assessment.
Results UNASSIGNED
Sixty-two patients participated in the study. Participants were grouped according to time post-surgery. Statistical analysis confirmed that data were comparable between groups (
Self-assessed strength UNASSIGNED
Median scores were 0.5 kg <2 years post-surgery, 3 kg at 2 to 5 years, 2 kg at 5 to 8 years and 1.3 kg in the >8 years group.
Stanmore Percentage of Normal Elbow Assessment UNASSIGNED
Mean scores (%) were 35 (SD ± 25) <2 years, 56 (SD ± 31) at 2 to 5 years, 44 (SD ± 25) at 5 to 8 years and 46 (SD ± 29) >8 years groups.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
This is the first study of self-assessed recovery following DFT. Scores peaked around 4 years post-operation. Future research should focus on the long-term self-reported outcome of nerve transfer surgery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38818094
doi: 10.1177/17585732221115047
pii: 10.1177_17585732221115047
pmc: PMC11135200
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

303-311

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2022.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Hazel Brown (H)

Peripheral Nerve Injury Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, Stanmore, Middlesex, UK.
UCL, Centre for Nerve Engineering, London, UK.

Tom Quick (T)

Peripheral Nerve Injury Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, Stanmore, Middlesex, UK.
UCL, Centre for Nerve Engineering, London, UK.

Classifications MeSH