Assessment of stone ablation rate using the Moses technology modes with different energy and pulse settings: An experimental study.

Laser lithotripsy Moses technology pulse modulation

Journal

Arab journal of urology
ISSN: 2090-598X
Titre abrégé: Arab J Urol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101562480

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
medline: 31 5 2024
pubmed: 31 5 2024
entrez: 31 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To compare lithotripsy ablation rate with the Moses modes versus conventional pulse modes when using the Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Ho:YAG) laser. The Lumenis® Pulse P120H Holmium Laser System and a 365 μm Moses D/F/L fiber were used to assess stone ablation rate in conventional Short and Long Pulse as well as Moses Contact and Distance at 10 W (0.5Jx20Hz and 2Jx5Hz) and 60 W (1Jx60Hz and 2Jx30Hz). Hard and soft phantom stones were formed, and all tests were conducted in a custom experimental configuration installed in a saline-filled bath. The laser was delivered up to 3 kJ of total energy. The fragmentation pattern was assessed via photographs in each cohort. The time to reach the target energy was 5 min and 50 s in all 10 W and 60 W trials, respectively. In both stone types, ablation was more effective when high-power, high-energy and Moses Distance was utilized. In soft stones, the lowest ablation rate was detected in the Long Pulse modality in all power, energy and frequency settings. Overall, when dusting settings (high-frequency, low-energy) were used, a deeper single cavitation was observed rather than small cavitations. The most effective pulse modality as evaluated via stone ablation rate depends on the stone hardness as well as energy and frequency settings. In both hard and soft stones, ablation is more effective when 60 W (2Jx30Hz) power settings and Moses Distance are used. Tailored laser settings in terms of energy and frequency could be set for each case scenario.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38818253
doi: 10.1080/20905998.2023.2301641
pii: 2301641
pmc: PMC11136463
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

131-137

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Auteurs

BegonaBallesta Martinez (B)

Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Spain.

Panteleimon Ntasiotis (P)

Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Paraskevi Katsakiori (P)

Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Vasileios Tatanis (V)

Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Angelis Peteinaris (A)

Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Solon Faitatziadis (S)

Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Kristiana Gkeka (K)

Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Theodoros Spinos (T)

Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Theofanis Vrettos (T)

Department of Anesthesiology and ICU, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Evangelos Liatsikos (E)

Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Panagiotis Kallidonis (P)

Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Classifications MeSH