Real-world assessment of Multipolar and Point-by-Point Mapping for Premature Ventricular Contraction Ablation.
Catheter Ablation
Left-sided premature ventricular contraction
Multielectrode mapping catheter
Point-by-Point mapping
Premature Ventricular Contraction
Journal
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
ISSN: 1532-2092
Titre abrégé: Europace
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883649
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 May 2024
31 May 2024
Historique:
received:
25
03
2024
accepted:
27
05
2024
medline:
31
5
2024
pubmed:
31
5
2024
entrez:
31
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
We aimed to assess acute and midterm efficacy of premature ventricular contraction (PVC) ablation guided by multielectrode and point-by-point (PbP) mapping. Retrospective, international multicenter study of consecutive patients referred for PVC ablation in 10 hospital centers from January 2017 to December 2021. Based on the mapping approach two cohorts were identified: the "Multipolar group" where a dedicated high density mapping catheter was employed and the "PbP group" where mapping was performed with the ablation catheter. Procedural endpoints, safety, acute (procedural) and midterm efficacy were assessed. Of the 698 patients included in this study, 592 received activation mapping (46% males, median age of 55[41-65] years) - 248 patients in the Multipolar group and 344 patients in the PbP group. A higher number of activation points (432 [217-843] vs. 95 [42-185], p<0.001), reduced mapping time (40±38 min vs. 61±50 min, p<0.001), and shorter procedure time (124±60 min vs. 143±63 min, p<0.001) were reported in the Multipolar group. Both groups had high acute success rates (84.7% with Multipolar mapping vs. 81.3% with PbP mapping, p=0.63), as well as midterm efficacy (83.4% vs. 77.4%, p=0.08), with no significant differences in the risk of adverse events (6.0% vs. 3.5%, p=0.24). However, for left-sided PVC ablation specifically, there was higher midterm efficacy in the Multipolar group (80.7% vs. 69.5%, p=0.04), with multipolar mapping being an independent predictor of success (adjusted OR= 2.231 [95% CI, 1.476-5.108], p=0.02). Acute and midterm efficacy of PVC ablation is high with both multipolar and PbP mapping, although the former allow for quicker procedures and may potentially improve the outcomes of left-sided PVC ablation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38818846
pii: 7685608
doi: 10.1093/europace/euae148
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.