Real-world assessment of Multipolar and Point-by-Point Mapping for Premature Ventricular Contraction Ablation.

Catheter Ablation Left-sided premature ventricular contraction Multielectrode mapping catheter Point-by-Point mapping Premature Ventricular Contraction

Journal

Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
ISSN: 1532-2092
Titre abrégé: Europace
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883649

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 May 2024
Historique:
received: 25 03 2024
accepted: 27 05 2024
medline: 31 5 2024
pubmed: 31 5 2024
entrez: 31 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

We aimed to assess acute and midterm efficacy of premature ventricular contraction (PVC) ablation guided by multielectrode and point-by-point (PbP) mapping. Retrospective, international multicenter study of consecutive patients referred for PVC ablation in 10 hospital centers from January 2017 to December 2021. Based on the mapping approach two cohorts were identified: the "Multipolar group" where a dedicated high density mapping catheter was employed and the "PbP group" where mapping was performed with the ablation catheter. Procedural endpoints, safety, acute (procedural) and midterm efficacy were assessed. Of the 698 patients included in this study, 592 received activation mapping (46% males, median age of 55[41-65] years) - 248 patients in the Multipolar group and 344 patients in the PbP group. A higher number of activation points (432 [217-843] vs. 95 [42-185], p<0.001), reduced mapping time (40±38 min vs. 61±50 min, p<0.001), and shorter procedure time (124±60 min vs. 143±63 min, p<0.001) were reported in the Multipolar group. Both groups had high acute success rates (84.7% with Multipolar mapping vs. 81.3% with PbP mapping, p=0.63), as well as midterm efficacy (83.4% vs. 77.4%, p=0.08), with no significant differences in the risk of adverse events (6.0% vs. 3.5%, p=0.24). However, for left-sided PVC ablation specifically, there was higher midterm efficacy in the Multipolar group (80.7% vs. 69.5%, p=0.04), with multipolar mapping being an independent predictor of success (adjusted OR= 2.231 [95% CI, 1.476-5.108], p=0.02). Acute and midterm efficacy of PVC ablation is high with both multipolar and PbP mapping, although the former allow for quicker procedures and may potentially improve the outcomes of left-sided PVC ablation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38818846
pii: 7685608
doi: 10.1093/europace/euae148
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Auteurs

Pedro A Sousa (PA)

Pacing & Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Department, Coimbra's Hospital and University Center, Coimbra, Portugal.

Johanna Tonko (J)

Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton, England.
Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, England.

Dagmara Dilling-Boer (D)

Hartcentrum Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.

Sérgio Barra (S)

Cardiology Department, Hospital da Luz Arrábida, V. N. Gaia, Portugal.

Anna-Sophie Eberl (AS)

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Borka Pezo (B)

University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

Nuno Cortez-Dias (N)

Arrhythmia Unit, Cardiology Department, Santa Maria University Hospital, Lisbon Academic Medical Center, Lisbon, Portugal.

Ziad Khoueiry (Z)

Cardiology Department, Clinique Saint Pierre, Perpignan, France.

Paulo Medeiros (P)

Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Entre Douro e Vouga, Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal.

Moisés Rodríguez-Mañero (M)

Cardiology Department, Compostela, Spain.

Ana Lebreiro (A)

Cardiology Department, University Hospital Center of São João, Porto, Portugal.

Luís Puga (L)

Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Entre Douro e Vouga, Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal.

Daniel Scherr (D)

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Natália António (N)

Pacing & Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Department, Coimbra's Hospital and University Center, Coimbra, Portugal.
ICBR, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal Cardiology Department, Santa Marta Hospital, Lisboa, Portugal.

Afonso Ferreira (A)

Arrhythmia Unit, Cardiology Department, Santa Maria University Hospital, Lisbon Academic Medical Center, Lisbon, Portugal.

Carolina Saleiro (C)

Pacing & Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Department, Coimbra's Hospital and University Center, Coimbra, Portugal.

Philippe Lagrange (P)

Cardiology Department, Clinique Saint Pierre, Perpignan, France.

Luis Adão (L)

Cardiology Department, University Hospital Center of São João, Porto, Portugal.

Joao de Sousa (J)

Arrhythmia Unit, Cardiology Department, Santa Maria University Hospital, Lisbon Academic Medical Center, Lisbon, Portugal.

Luís Elvas (L)

Pacing & Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Department, Coimbra's Hospital and University Center, Coimbra, Portugal.

Mário Oliveira (M)

Cardiology Department, Santa Marta Hospital, Lisboa, Portugal.

Lino Gonçalves (L)

Pacing & Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Department, Coimbra's Hospital and University Center, Coimbra, Portugal.
ICBR, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal Cardiology Department, Santa Marta Hospital, Lisboa, Portugal.

John Silberbauer (J)

Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton, England.

Classifications MeSH