Perception of Rhinoplasty Outcome Utilizing Patients' Photography.
Journal
The Journal of craniofacial surgery
ISSN: 1536-3732
Titre abrégé: J Craniofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 May 2024
31 May 2024
Historique:
received:
25
03
2024
accepted:
03
05
2024
medline:
31
5
2024
pubmed:
31
5
2024
entrez:
31
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Patient satisfaction with rhinoplasty results is evaluated in a manner of subjective and qualitative values, and to a certain degree, it can indicate successful outcomes in rhinoplasty. The present study was a descriptive study that assessed the rhinoplasty outcome of adult patients who underwent septorhinoplasty between January 2015 and August 2023 at a single center in Saudi Arabia utilizing Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation scores and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scores pre-operatively, postoperatively, and postoperatively with showing the patients their photo before surgery. The comparison of Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation scores and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scores showed statistically significant with P value of 0.000 when comparing these scores pre-operatively, postoperatively, and postoperatively with showing the patient their photos before surgery. Presenting patients with pre-operative images may help them recognize changes in their clinical appearance and, consequently, score higher on the postoperative satisfaction scale. It can help the surgeon to increase patient satisfaction postoperatively.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Patient satisfaction with rhinoplasty results is evaluated in a manner of subjective and qualitative values, and to a certain degree, it can indicate successful outcomes in rhinoplasty.
METHODS
METHODS
The present study was a descriptive study that assessed the rhinoplasty outcome of adult patients who underwent septorhinoplasty between January 2015 and August 2023 at a single center in Saudi Arabia utilizing Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation scores and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scores pre-operatively, postoperatively, and postoperatively with showing the patients their photo before surgery.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The comparison of Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation scores and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scores showed statistically significant with P value of 0.000 when comparing these scores pre-operatively, postoperatively, and postoperatively with showing the patient their photos before surgery.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Presenting patients with pre-operative images may help them recognize changes in their clinical appearance and, consequently, score higher on the postoperative satisfaction scale. It can help the surgeon to increase patient satisfaction postoperatively.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38819168
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010344
pii: 00001665-990000000-01652
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Références
Statistics, P. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2018 plastic surgery statistics report. Plast Surg 2017;25:7–8
Zojaji R, Sobhani E, Keshavarzmanesh M, et al. The association between facial proportions and patient satisfaction after rhinoplasty: a prospective study. Plast Surg 2019;27:167–172
Zamani SN, Fazilatpour M. The effects of cosmetic surgery on patients’ self-esteem and negative image of themselves. J Kerman Univ Med Sci 2013;20:492–504
Vuyk HD, Stroomer J, Vinayak B. The role of computer imaging in facial plastic surgery consultation: a clinical study. Clin Otolaryngol All Sci 1998;23:235–243
Guyuron B, Bokhari F. Patient satisfaction following rhinoplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 1996;20:153–157
Moolenburgh SE, Mureau MA, Hofer SO. Aesthetic outcome after nasal reconstruction: patient versus panel perception. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg 2008;61:1459–1464
Cingi C, Eskiizmir G. Deviated nose attenuates the degree of patient satisfaction and quality of life in rhinoplasty: a prospective controlled study. Clin Otolaryngol 2013;38:136–141
Davis RE, Bublik M. Psychological considerations in the revision rhinoplasty patient. Fac Plast Surg 2012;28:374–379
Sharp HR, Tingay RS, Coman S, et al. Computer imaging and patient satisfaction in rhinoplasty surgery. J Laryngol Otol 2002;116:1009–1013
Mulafikh DS, Alharethy SE, Alqabbani AA, et al. Validation and clinical application of the Arabic rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation questionnaire. Saudi Med J 2021;42:655
Izu SC, Kosugi EM, Brandão KV, et al. Normal values for the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2012;78:76–79
Amer MA, Kabbash IA, Younes A, et al. Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Arabic version of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation scale. Laryngoscope 2017;127:2455–2459
Chauhan N, Alexander AJ, Sepehr A, et al. Patient complaints with primary versus revision rhinoplasty: analysis and practice implications. Aesthet Surg J 2011;31:775–780
Rohrich RJ. Mirror, mirror on the wall: when the postoperative reflection does not meet patients’ expectations. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021;148(5S):15S–17S
Hellings PW, Nolst Trenité GJ. Long‐term patient satisfaction after revision rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 2007;117:985–989
Gomez-Rice A, Madrid C, Izquierdo E, et al. Does clinical photography influence satisfaction with surgery in adult patients operated on for spinal deformity? Int J Spine Surg 2021;14:1037–1042