Mapping climate adaptation corridors for biodiversity-A regional-scale case study in Central America.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 07 03 2024
accepted: 18 05 2024
medline: 31 5 2024
pubmed: 31 5 2024
entrez: 31 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Climate adaptation corridors are widely recognized as important for promoting biodiversity resilience under climate change. Central America is part of the Mesoamerican biodiversity hotspot, but there have been no regional-scale analyses of potential climate adaptation corridors in Central America. We identified 2375 potential corridors throughout Central America that link lowland protected areas (≤ 500 m) with intact, high-elevation forests (≥ 1500 m) that represent potential climate change refugia. Whereas we found potential corridors in all Central American countries, potential corridors in Panama, Belize, and Honduras were most protected (medians = 64%, 49%, and 47%, respectively) and potential corridors in El Salvador were least protected (median = 10%). We also developed a corridor priority index based on the ecological characteristics and protected status of potential corridors and their associated start and end points. Compared to low- and medium-priority corridors, high-priority corridors (n = 160; top 7% of all corridors) were generally more protected, forested, and distributed across wider elevational gradients and more Key Biodiversity Areas, but also generally linked larger lowland protected areas to target areas that were larger, more protected, and spanned wider elevational gradients. For example, based on median values, high-priority corridors were 9% more protected and overlapped with 2-3 more Key Biodiversity Areas than low- and medium-priority corridors. Although high-elevation targets spanned considerably wider elevational gradients than lowland protected areas (medians = 695 vs. 142 m, respectively) and thus may be more likely to support refugia, they were considerably smaller than lowland protected areas (medians = 11 vs. 50 km2 respectively) and mostly unprotected (median = 4% protection). This initial, regional assessment can help prioritize locations for finer-scale research, conservation, and restoration activities in support of climate adaptation corridors throughout Central America and highlights the need for greater conservation of potential high-elevation refugia.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38820545
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304756
pii: PONE-D-24-09375
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0304756

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 McCullough et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Nat Commun. 2016 Aug 01;7:12349
pubmed: 27476545
Conserv Biol. 2018 Dec;32(6):1414-1425
pubmed: 29744936
Front Ecol Environ. 2020 Jun 1;18(5):228-234
pubmed: 33424494
Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 8;11(1):5978
pubmed: 33293507
Conserv Biol. 2019 Aug;33(4):976-978
pubmed: 30569451
Biol Conserv. 2019 Oct;238:108183
pubmed: 31885400
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Apr;28(7):2413-2424
pubmed: 34981617
Sci Data. 2020 Apr 6;7(1):112
pubmed: 32249772
Mov Ecol. 2020 Jan 07;8:1
pubmed: 31921423
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Nov;24(11):5243-5258
pubmed: 30246358
J Environ Manage. 2022 May 15;310:114717
pubmed: 35217445
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 26;11(10):e0162377
pubmed: 27783617
J Stat Softw. 2017;76:
pubmed: 36568334
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 23;16(3):e0249072
pubmed: 33755706
Conserv Biol. 2015 Feb;29(1):122-32
pubmed: 25065425
Conserv Biol. 2023 Dec;37(6):e14163
pubmed: 37581508
Ambio. 2014 Oct;43(6):820-4
pubmed: 24375401
Conserv Biol. 2023 Aug;37(4):e14087
pubmed: 36919472
Environ Pollut. 2021 Sep 1;284:117187
pubmed: 33906034
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 May;26(5):2944-2955
pubmed: 31961042
Conserv Biol. 2013 Apr;27(2):407-16
pubmed: 23410037
Biol Conserv. 2018 Mar;219:53-67
pubmed: 29503460
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 22;10(1):6798
pubmed: 32321948

Auteurs

Ian M McCullough (IM)

Osa Conservation, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Osa Conservation Campus, Puntarenas, Costa Rica.

Christopher Beirne (C)

Osa Conservation, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Osa Conservation Campus, Puntarenas, Costa Rica.

Carolina Soto-Navarro (C)

Osa Conservation, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Osa Conservation Campus, Puntarenas, Costa Rica.
UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Andrew Whitworth (A)

Osa Conservation, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Osa Conservation Campus, Puntarenas, Costa Rica.
Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Department of Biology, Center for Energy, Environment and Sustainability, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America.

Articles similaires

Humans Climate Change Health Personnel Surveys and Questionnaires Medical Oncology
Lakes Salinity Archaea Bacteria Microbiota
Rivers Turkey Biodiversity Environmental Monitoring Animals
1.00
Iran Environmental Monitoring Seasons Ecosystem Forests

Classifications MeSH