Functional outcomes of diets in multiple sclerosis (FOOD for MS): Protocol for a parallel arm randomized feeding trial for low glycemic load and calorie restriction.

Calorie restriction Glycemic load Multiple sclerosis Obesity Physical function

Journal

Contemporary clinical trials
ISSN: 1559-2030
Titre abrégé: Contemp Clin Trials
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101242342

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 May 2024
Historique:
received: 07 03 2024
revised: 23 05 2024
accepted: 28 05 2024
medline: 1 6 2024
pubmed: 1 6 2024
entrez: 31 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Pilot trials indicate that both a low glycemic load (GL) diet and calorie restriction (CR) can be implemented successfully in people with multiple sclerosis (pMS) and may improve MS symptoms and physical function, but large randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have not yet been conducted. The purpose of this study is to test these interventions alone and in combination to determine their efficacy for improving clinical and patient reported outcomes (PROs) in pMS. This 32-week, two-arm, RCT at two centers will randomly assign 100 adults with relapsing-remitting or secondary progressive MS to a low GL diet (n = 50) or a standard GL diet (n = 50). Both diet groups will complete two study phases: a eucaloric phase (16 weeks) and a CR phase (16 weeks). Groceries for the study meal plans will be delivered to participants' homes weekly. The primary outcome is physical function, measured by timed 25-ft walk test. Secondary outcomes are pain, fatigue, mood, and anxiety. This will be the most rigorous intervention trial to date of a low GL diet and CR in adults with MS, and among the first to assess the impact of intentional weight loss on MS symptoms. Results will provide valuable insight for recommending dietary change, weight loss, or both to adults with MS. These non-drug interventions pose few risks and have potential to yield significant improvements in MS symptoms. NCT05327322.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Pilot trials indicate that both a low glycemic load (GL) diet and calorie restriction (CR) can be implemented successfully in people with multiple sclerosis (pMS) and may improve MS symptoms and physical function, but large randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have not yet been conducted. The purpose of this study is to test these interventions alone and in combination to determine their efficacy for improving clinical and patient reported outcomes (PROs) in pMS.
METHODS METHODS
This 32-week, two-arm, RCT at two centers will randomly assign 100 adults with relapsing-remitting or secondary progressive MS to a low GL diet (n = 50) or a standard GL diet (n = 50). Both diet groups will complete two study phases: a eucaloric phase (16 weeks) and a CR phase (16 weeks). Groceries for the study meal plans will be delivered to participants' homes weekly. The primary outcome is physical function, measured by timed 25-ft walk test. Secondary outcomes are pain, fatigue, mood, and anxiety.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
This will be the most rigorous intervention trial to date of a low GL diet and CR in adults with MS, and among the first to assess the impact of intentional weight loss on MS symptoms. Results will provide valuable insight for recommending dietary change, weight loss, or both to adults with MS. These non-drug interventions pose few risks and have potential to yield significant improvements in MS symptoms.
TRIAL REGISTRATION ID BACKGROUND
NCT05327322.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38821260
pii: S1551-7144(24)00167-8
doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107584
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05327322']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

107584

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Kat Martin (K)

Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States.

Stacey S Cofield (SS)

Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States.

Anne H Cross (AH)

Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, United States.

Amy M Goss (AM)

Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States.

Cyrus A Raji (CA)

Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, United States; Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis.

John R Rinker (JR)

Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States.

Gregory F Wu (GF)

Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, United States; Departments Pathology & Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, United States; Neurology Service, Veterans Affairs Saint Louis Health Care System, Saint Louis, United States.

Jessica Blair (J)

Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States.

Anja Fuchs (A)

Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, United States.

Laura Ghezzi (L)

Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, United States.

Kathryn Green (K)

Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States.

Francesca Pace (F)

Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, United States.

Geovanni Pastori (G)

Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, United States.

Meghan G Taylor (MG)

Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States.

Laura Piccio (L)

Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, United States; Charles Perkins Centre, School of Medical Sciences, Neuroscience Theme, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Brooks C Wingo (BC)

Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States. Electronic address: bcwingo@uab.edu.

Classifications MeSH