INTRAOPERATIVE TRANSIT-TIME FLOW AS A PREDICTOR OF FAILURE AFTER INFRAINGUINAL REVASCULARIZATION WITH HEPARIN-BONDED EXPANDED POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE GRAFT.

Heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene Infrainguinal bypass flow-meter limb ischemia

Journal

Annals of vascular surgery
ISSN: 1615-5947
Titre abrégé: Ann Vasc Surg
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8703941

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 May 2024
Historique:
received: 10 03 2024
revised: 03 04 2024
accepted: 03 04 2024
medline: 1 6 2024
pubmed: 1 6 2024
entrez: 31 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The Heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (He-ePTFE) conduit is an option for patients requiring infrainguinal revascularization (iIR), but the risk of failure may be unpredictable, especially in cases with poor run-off. Intraoperative transit-time flow (TTF) provides an automated and quantitative analysis of flow and may serve as an adjunct evaluation during surgical revascularization. The aim of this study was to assess TTF in patients undergoing iIR with He-PTFE at three referral hospitals and to establish a predictive flow threshold for graft occlusion. A prospective registry initiated in 2020 enrolled patients undergoing infrainguinal revascularization (iIR) using He-PTFE for critical limb ischemia or severe claudication, and TTF measurement was analyzed. Preoperative assessments of anatomical and clinical characteristics were available for all patients. The HT353 Optima Meter (Transonic Systems Inc., Ithaca, NY, USA) was used in all procedures according to a standardized protocol. The institutional ethics committee approved the study. A predictive model using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was utilized to establish the threshold of flow, and variables were compared. Anatomical and clinical evaluation were reported according to Rutherford grade, Global Limb Anatomic System (GLASS) and Wound, Ischemia and foot Infection (WIfI) classification. The main outcome considered was the correlation between TTF and graft occlusion. Secondary outcomes included survival, other predictors of graft occlusion, freedom from major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and freedom from major amputation. Among 68 patients, 55.8% had Rutherford 5-6, 45.6% had GLASS 3 and 73.5% had WIfI 3-4. Distal anastomosis was at tibial level in 23.5% and mean diameter of conduit was 6.4mm. Basal and post-operative TTF was 27.8 ± 15.6ml/min and 109.0 ± 53.0mil/min, respectively. After a mean follow up of 18 ± 13 months, 7 (10.9%) patients presented graft occlusion and 5 (7.8%) required major amputation. TTF threshold = 80 ml/min revealed a sensitivity and specificity of 81.8% (95%CI 48,2 - 97,7) and 80.7% (95% CI 68,1 - 90,0) respectively and it was selected as cut-off for graft occlusion. Freedom from graft occlusion in patients with TTF >80ml/min vs TTF ≤80ml/min at 6, 12, 24 months was 95.7% (SE=0.030) vs 65.5% (SE= 0.115), 95.7% (SE =0.030) vs 58.9% (SE=0.120) and 90.9% (SE=0.054) vs 51.6% (SE=0.126), p= 0.0003. No statistical difference in primary patency, secondary patency and limb salvage was observed. At multivariate analysis, distal anastomosis at tibial vessel (OR 8.50) and TTF ≤80ml/min (OR 9.39) were independent predictors of graft occlusion. These results suggest that TTF may serve as a valuable tool in the management of iIR. An TTF measurement of ≤80 ml/min should be regarded as a predictor of graft occlusion, prompting consideration of additional intraoperative maneuvers to enhance arterial flow. Caution should be exercised in patients requiring direct tibial artery revascularization, as it represents a predictor of failure independent of TTF levels. Larger cohorts of patients and longer follow-up periods are necessary to confirm these findings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38821469
pii: S0890-5096(24)00255-3
doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.04.008
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Luca Mezzetto (L)

Unit of Vascular Surgery, Integrated University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy. Electronic address: luca.mezzetto@aovr.veneto.it.

Mario D'Oria (M)

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital of Trieste, University Health Agency Giuliano-Isontina, Trieste, Italy.

Davide Mastrorilli (D)

Unit of Vascular Surgery, Integrated University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Lorenzo Grosso (L)

Unit of Vascular Surgery, Integrated University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Luigi Agresti (L)

Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, General Surgery Department, ASUFC, Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy.

Filippo Griselli (F)

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital of Trieste, University Health Agency Giuliano-Isontina, Trieste, Italy.

Paolo Frigatti (P)

Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, General Surgery Department, ASUFC, Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy.

Sandro Lepidi (S)

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital of Trieste, University Health Agency Giuliano-Isontina, Trieste, Italy.

Gian Franco Veraldi (GF)

Unit of Vascular Surgery, Integrated University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Classifications MeSH