Does supplemental private health insurance impact health care utilization and seeking behavior of residents covered by social health insurance? Evidence from China National Health Services Survey.
Choice of health care provider
Health care seeking behavior
Health care utilization
Private health insurance
Social health insurance
Journal
International journal for equity in health
ISSN: 1475-9276
Titre abrégé: Int J Equity Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147692
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 May 2024
31 May 2024
Historique:
received:
14
12
2023
accepted:
24
03
2024
medline:
1
6
2024
pubmed:
1
6
2024
entrez:
31
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Supplemental private health insurance (PHI) plays a crucial role in complementing China's social health insurance (SHI). However, the effectiveness of incorporating PHI as supplementary coverage lacks conclusive evidence regarding its impact on healthcare utilization and seeking behavior among SHI-covered individuals. Therefore, investigating the effects of supplementary PHI on health care utilization and seeking behavior of residents covered by social health insurance is essential to provide empirical evidence for informed decision-making within the Chinese healthcare system. Data from the 2018 China National Health Services Survey were analyzed to compare outpatient and inpatient healthcare utilization and choices between PHI purchasers and non-purchasers across three SHI schemes: urban employee-based basic medical insurance (UEBMI), urban resident-based basic medical insurance (URBMI), and the new rural cooperative medical scheme (NRCMS). Using the Andersen Healthcare Services Utilization Behavior Model as the theoretical framework,binary logistic regression and multinomial logistic regression (MNL) models were employed to assess the impact of PHI on healthcare utilization and provider preferences. Among UEBMI, URBMI, and NRCMS participants with PHI, outpatient visit rates were 17.9, 19.8, and 21.7%, and inpatient admission rates were 12.4, 9.9, and 12.9%, respectively. Participants without PHI exhibited higher rates for outpatient visits (23.6, 24.3, and 25.6%) and inpatient admissions (15.2, 12.8, and 14.5%). Binomial logistic regression analyses revealed a higher probability of outpatient visits and inpatient admissions among UEBMI participants with PHI (p < 0.05). NRCMS participants with PHI showed a lower probability of outpatient visits but a higher probability of inpatient admissions (p < 0.05). Multinomial logistic regression indicated that NRCMS participants with PHI were more likely to choose higher-level hospitals, with a 17% increase for county hospitals and 27% for provincial or higher-level hospitals compared to primary care facilities. The findings indicate that the possession of PHI correlated with increased utilization of outpatient and inpatient healthcare services among participants covered by UEBMI. Moreover, for participants under the NRCMS, the presence of PHI is linked to a proclivity for seeking outpatient care at higher-level hospitals and heightened utilization of inpatient services. These results underscore the nuanced influence of supplementary PHI on healthcare-seeking behavior, emphasizing variations across individuals covered by distinct SHI schemes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Supplemental private health insurance (PHI) plays a crucial role in complementing China's social health insurance (SHI). However, the effectiveness of incorporating PHI as supplementary coverage lacks conclusive evidence regarding its impact on healthcare utilization and seeking behavior among SHI-covered individuals. Therefore, investigating the effects of supplementary PHI on health care utilization and seeking behavior of residents covered by social health insurance is essential to provide empirical evidence for informed decision-making within the Chinese healthcare system.
METHODS
METHODS
Data from the 2018 China National Health Services Survey were analyzed to compare outpatient and inpatient healthcare utilization and choices between PHI purchasers and non-purchasers across three SHI schemes: urban employee-based basic medical insurance (UEBMI), urban resident-based basic medical insurance (URBMI), and the new rural cooperative medical scheme (NRCMS). Using the Andersen Healthcare Services Utilization Behavior Model as the theoretical framework,binary logistic regression and multinomial logistic regression (MNL) models were employed to assess the impact of PHI on healthcare utilization and provider preferences.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among UEBMI, URBMI, and NRCMS participants with PHI, outpatient visit rates were 17.9, 19.8, and 21.7%, and inpatient admission rates were 12.4, 9.9, and 12.9%, respectively. Participants without PHI exhibited higher rates for outpatient visits (23.6, 24.3, and 25.6%) and inpatient admissions (15.2, 12.8, and 14.5%). Binomial logistic regression analyses revealed a higher probability of outpatient visits and inpatient admissions among UEBMI participants with PHI (p < 0.05). NRCMS participants with PHI showed a lower probability of outpatient visits but a higher probability of inpatient admissions (p < 0.05). Multinomial logistic regression indicated that NRCMS participants with PHI were more likely to choose higher-level hospitals, with a 17% increase for county hospitals and 27% for provincial or higher-level hospitals compared to primary care facilities.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The findings indicate that the possession of PHI correlated with increased utilization of outpatient and inpatient healthcare services among participants covered by UEBMI. Moreover, for participants under the NRCMS, the presence of PHI is linked to a proclivity for seeking outpatient care at higher-level hospitals and heightened utilization of inpatient services. These results underscore the nuanced influence of supplementary PHI on healthcare-seeking behavior, emphasizing variations across individuals covered by distinct SHI schemes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38822330
doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02158-8
pii: 10.1186/s12939-024-02158-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
113Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
The Ministry of Health. China health statistical Yearbook-2012. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Press; 2012.
Chen H, Yang X. Research on adverse selection and moral Hazard of rural residents participating in commercial medical insurance. Rural Econ. 2022;10:91–101.
Jung HW, Kwon YD, Noh JW. How public and private health insurance coverage mitigates catastrophic health expenditures in Republic of Korea. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):1042. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08405-4 .
Sekhri N, Savedoff W. Private health insurance: implications for developing countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83:127–34.
pubmed: 15744405
pmcid: 2623814
State Administration of Financial Supervision.Table of Original Insurance Premium Income by Region of the Country. 2008,2019. http://www.cbirc.gov.cn/cn/view/pages/tongjishuju/tongjishuju.html . Accessed 16 Jul 2023.
Center for Health Statistics and Information NHC. An analysis report of National Health Service Survey in China, 2018. Beijing,China: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2021.
Yu mingren,Chenyu,Xujuan.Current status of the development of universal health insurance at the provincial level in China. Chinese health Resources,2022,25(02):217–222+229.
Kiil A, Arendt JN. The effect of complementary private health insurance on the use of health care services. Int J Health Econ Manag. 2017;17:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-016-9195-3 .
doi: 10.1007/s10754-016-9195-3
pubmed: 28477291
Jowett M, Deolalikar A, Martinsson P. Health insurance and treatment seeking behaviour: evidence from a low-income country. Health Econ. 2004;13(9):845–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.862 .
doi: 10.1002/hec.862
pubmed: 15362177
Choi Y, Kim JH, Yoo KB. The effect of cost-sharing in private health insurance on the utilization of health care services between private insurance purchasers and non-purchasers: a study of the Korean health panel survey (2008-2012). BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;10(15):489. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1153-0 .
doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1153-0
Cantarero-Prieto D, Pascual-Sáez M, Gonzalez-Prieto N. Effect of having private health insurance on the use of health care services: the case of Spain. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):716. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2667-4 .
doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2667-4
pubmed: 29132423
pmcid: 5684766
Moreira S, Barros PP. Double health insurance coverage and health care utilization: evidence from quantile regression. Health Econ. 2010;19(9):1075–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1641 .
Barros PP, Machado MP, Sanz-de-Galdeano A. Moral hazard and the demand for health services: a matching estimator approach. J Health Econ. 2008;27(4):1006–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.02.007 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.02.007
pubmed: 18406484
Franc C, Perronnin M, Pierre A. Supplemental health insurance and healthcare consumption-a dynamic approach to moral Hazard. Health Econ. 2016;25(12):1582–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3271 .
doi: 10.1002/hec.3271
pubmed: 26468078
Chai H. An empirical analysis of urban and rural residents' demand for medical services and medical insurance in China. World Econ Pap. 2013;05:107–19.
Fu C. The Effect of Commercial Medical Insurance under Conditions of Social Basic Medical Insurance-from the Perspective of Medical Expenditure. Anhui University of Finance and Economics, 2022. https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.26916/d.cnki.gahcc.2022.000185 . https://doi.org/10.26916/d.cnki.gahcc.2022.000185 . [in Chinese].
Bo H, Zhang YA. Study on the Adverse Selection of Supplemental Commercial medical Insurance-Evidence Based on CHARLS Data. Insurance Stud. 2015;329(09):65–81.
Rodríguez M, Stoyanova A. The effect of private insurance access on the choice of GP/specialist and public/private provider in Spain. Health Econ. 2004;13(7):689–703. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.832 .
doi: 10.1002/hec.832
pubmed: 15259047
Jones AM, Koolman X, Doorslaerb EV. The impact of supplementary private health insurance on the use of specialists in European countries. Annales d'économie et de Statist. 2006;83–84(84):251–75.
doi: 10.2307/20079170
González-Álvarez L, Clavero A. Inequalities in health care utilization in Spain due to double insurance coverage. An Oaxaca-ransom decomposition. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(5):793–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.06.037 .
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.06.037
pubmed: 19628322
Vera‐Hernández ÁM. Duplicate coverage and demand for health care. The case of Catalonia. Health economics, 1999;8(7):579-598.
Buchmueller TC, Couffinhal A, Grignon M, et al. Access to physician services: does supplemental insurance matter? Evidence from France. Health Econ. 2004;13(7):669. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.879 .
doi: 10.1002/hec.879
pubmed: 15259046
Schokkaert E, Ourti TV, Graeve DD, et al. Supplemental health insurance and equality of access in Belgium. Health Econ. 2010;19:377–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1478 .
doi: 10.1002/hec.1478
pubmed: 19353529
Jonneke Bolhaar, Maarten Lindeboom, Bas van der Klaauw,. A dynamic analysis of the demand for health insurance and health care. European Economic Review, 2012;56:669–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.03.002 .
Yan X, Liu Y, Rao K. Trends in disparities in healthcare utilisation between and within health insurances in China between 2008 and 2018: a repeated cross-sectional study. Int J Equity Health. 2022;21(1):30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01633-4 .
doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01633-4
pubmed: 35209916
pmcid: 8876177
Li Y, Lu S. Theoretical construction and analysis path evolution of the Andersen model. Chinese health. Serv Manag. 2017;34(5):324–7.
Andersen MR. National health surveys and the behavioral model of health services use. Med Care. 2008;46(7):647–53.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817a835d
pubmed: 18580382
Kehrer B, Andersen R, Glaser WA. A behavioral model of families' use of health services. J Hum Resour. 1972;7(1):125.
doi: 10.2307/145064
Lemming MR, Calsyn RJ. Utility of the behavioral model in predicting service utilization by individuals suffering from severe mental illness and homelessness. Community Ment Health J. 2004;40(4):347–64.
doi: 10.1023/B:COMH.0000035229.20557.5c
pubmed: 15453086
Yang L. The effect of commercial medical insurance under conditions of new rural cooperative Medical System.Yunnan University, 2016. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=YoFA4grnCX5xhYGFt3m7DNPS2xPDOau9JylB51P6MEGEf6SEEdCjUh3Zj7_9v_Ww7ZGyXz1PzZtrA7MV9LRRg5bWv2GQJPxTNjtFAFd7kgF28K3BABv2dLprRAa76TiLZVTWkg5iY0hxL3954bB4sQ==& . [in Chinese].
State Administration of Financial Supervision. Table of Original Insurance Premium Income by Region of the Country. 2019. http://www.cbirc.gov.cn/cn/view/pages/ItemDetail.html?docId=371349&itemId=954&generaltype=0 . Accessed 16 Jul 2023.
Luo J. The impact of commercial medical insurance on urban and rural medical service utilization differences.Southwest. University of Finance and Economics; 2022.
Odeyemi I, Nixon J. Assessing equity in health care through the national health insurance schemes of Nigeria and Ghana: a review-based comparative analysis. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12:1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-12-9 .
Australian Government Deparment of Health and Aged Care. About private health insurance. 2021. https://www.health.gov.au/health-topics/privatehealthinsurance/aboutprivatehealthinsurance . Accessed 15 Jul 2023.
Van Hees SGM, O’Fallon T, Hofker M, et al. Leaving no one behind? Social inclusion of health insurance in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Int J Equity Health. 2019;18:1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1040-0 .