Preliminary results of stabilization of far distal tibia fractures with the distal tibial nail: A prospective, multicenter case series study.

Complications Distal tibial fracture Distal tibial nail Functional outcome Retrograde intramedullary nail

Journal

Injury
ISSN: 1879-0267
Titre abrégé: Injury
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0226040

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 May 2024
Historique:
received: 11 03 2024
revised: 14 05 2024
accepted: 27 05 2024
medline: 2 6 2024
pubmed: 2 6 2024
entrez: 1 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The distal tibial nail (DTN) is a novel retrograde intramedullary nail used for distal tibial fracture stabilization. We investigated the clinical results of DTN use for distal tibial fractures and compared them with those reported in the literature on locking plates and antegrade intramedullary nails. This multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study examined distal tibial fractures with AO/OTA classification 43 types: A1, A2, A3 or C1. The primary outcomes included bone union rate, soft tissue problems, and surgical complications. Secondary outcomes were EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L), Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q), and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot clinical scores 1 year postoperatively. Incidence of varus or valgus/anterior-posterior flexion deformity with a difference of ≥5° and postoperative reduction loss rate were evaluated. Five men and five women were enrolled (mean age, 69 years [range, 30-77 years]), including one open-fracture-type Gustilo type IIIB case. Bone union was observed in all patients at 6 months postoperatively. Delayed union, leg edema, and guide pin breakage were observed in three, one, and one cases, respectively. No soft tissue or surgical complications were observed. During the final follow-up, the EQ-5D-5L, SAFE-Q, and AOFAS hindfoot scores were 0.876 (0.665-1.0), 83-92, and AOFAS 92.6 (76-100), respectively. Varus and retroflexion deformities were observed in one case each. DTN has been reported to have biomechanically equivalent or stronger fixation strength than locking plates or antegrade intramedullary nails. In addition, while DTN was thought to be less invasive for soft tissue and can avoid injury to the knee, it was thought that care should be taken to avoid medial malleolus fractures and posterior tibialis tendon injuries. Comparisons with literature treatment results for locking plates and antegrade intramedullary nails showed comparable to advantageous results. DTN treatment results for distal tibial fractures were as good as those for locking plates and antegrade intramedullary nails. DTN is useful for stabilization and does not compromise the surrounding soft tissues.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38823095
pii: S0020-1383(24)00340-1
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111634
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

111634

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Yasuaki Yamakawa (Y)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi, Japan. Electronic address: yamakawayasuaki@yahoo.co.jp.

Takenori Uehara (T)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.

Kenji Shigemoto (K)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Toyama Municipal Hospital, Toyama, Japan.

Shimpei Kitada (S)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery/Trauma Center, Hyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.

Atsuhiko Mogami (A)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Juntendo Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.

Naofumi Shiota (N)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.

Takeshi Doi (T)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Okayama Hospital, Okayama, Japan.

Masahide Yoshimura (M)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tsuyama Chuo Hospital, Okayama, Japan.

Tomoyuki Noda (T)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School General Medical Center, Okayama, Japan; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.

Takeshi Sawaguchi (T)

Department of Traumatology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan; Trauma and Reconstruction Center, Shinyurigaoka General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.

Sebastian Kuhn (S)

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany; Department of Digital Medicine, Medical School OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

Pol Maria Rommens (PM)

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Classifications MeSH