Preliminary results of stabilization of far distal tibia fractures with the distal tibial nail: A prospective, multicenter case series study.
Complications
Distal tibial fracture
Distal tibial nail
Functional outcome
Retrograde intramedullary nail
Journal
Injury
ISSN: 1879-0267
Titre abrégé: Injury
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0226040
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 May 2024
28 May 2024
Historique:
received:
11
03
2024
revised:
14
05
2024
accepted:
27
05
2024
medline:
2
6
2024
pubmed:
2
6
2024
entrez:
1
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The distal tibial nail (DTN) is a novel retrograde intramedullary nail used for distal tibial fracture stabilization. We investigated the clinical results of DTN use for distal tibial fractures and compared them with those reported in the literature on locking plates and antegrade intramedullary nails. This multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study examined distal tibial fractures with AO/OTA classification 43 types: A1, A2, A3 or C1. The primary outcomes included bone union rate, soft tissue problems, and surgical complications. Secondary outcomes were EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L), Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q), and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot clinical scores 1 year postoperatively. Incidence of varus or valgus/anterior-posterior flexion deformity with a difference of ≥5° and postoperative reduction loss rate were evaluated. Five men and five women were enrolled (mean age, 69 years [range, 30-77 years]), including one open-fracture-type Gustilo type IIIB case. Bone union was observed in all patients at 6 months postoperatively. Delayed union, leg edema, and guide pin breakage were observed in three, one, and one cases, respectively. No soft tissue or surgical complications were observed. During the final follow-up, the EQ-5D-5L, SAFE-Q, and AOFAS hindfoot scores were 0.876 (0.665-1.0), 83-92, and AOFAS 92.6 (76-100), respectively. Varus and retroflexion deformities were observed in one case each. DTN has been reported to have biomechanically equivalent or stronger fixation strength than locking plates or antegrade intramedullary nails. In addition, while DTN was thought to be less invasive for soft tissue and can avoid injury to the knee, it was thought that care should be taken to avoid medial malleolus fractures and posterior tibialis tendon injuries. Comparisons with literature treatment results for locking plates and antegrade intramedullary nails showed comparable to advantageous results. DTN treatment results for distal tibial fractures were as good as those for locking plates and antegrade intramedullary nails. DTN is useful for stabilization and does not compromise the surrounding soft tissues.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38823095
pii: S0020-1383(24)00340-1
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111634
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
111634Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.