Scoring facial attractiveness with deep convolutional neural networks: How training on standardized images reduces the bias of facial expressions.
artificial intelligence
deep convolutional neural networks
emotions
facial attractiveness
facial expressions
Journal
Orthodontics & craniofacial research
ISSN: 1601-6343
Titre abrégé: Orthod Craniofac Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101144387
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Jun 2024
02 Jun 2024
Historique:
accepted:
17
05
2024
medline:
3
6
2024
pubmed:
3
6
2024
entrez:
3
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
In many medical disciplines, facial attractiveness is part of the diagnosis, yet its scoring might be confounded by facial expressions. The intent was to apply deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) to identify how facial expressions affect facial attractiveness and to explore whether a dedicated training of the CNN is able to reduce the bias of facial expressions. Frontal facial images (n = 840) of 40 female participants (mean age 24.5 years) were taken adapting a neutral facial expression and the six universal facial expressions. Facial attractiveness was computed by means of a face detector, deep convolutional neural networks, standard support vector regression for facial beauty, visual regularized collaborative filtering and a regression technique for handling visual queries without rating history. CNN was first trained on random facial photographs from a dating website and then further trained on the Chicago Face Database (CFD) to increase its suitability to medical conditions. Both algorithms scored every image for attractiveness. Facial expressions affect facial attractiveness scores significantly. Scores from CNN additionally trained on CFD had less variability between the expressions (range 54.3-60.9 compared to range: 32.6-49.5) and less variance within the scores (P ≤ .05), but also caused a shift in the ranking of the expressions' facial attractiveness. Facial expressions confound attractiveness scores. Training on norming images generated scores less susceptible to distortion, but more difficult to interpret. Scoring facial attractiveness based on CNN seems promising, but AI solutions must be developed on CNN trained to recognize facial expressions as distractors.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Swiss association of dentomaxillofacial radiology
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s). Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Zhai Y, Cao H, Deng W, Gan J, Piuri V, Zeng J. BeautyNet: joint multiscale CNN and transfer learning method for unconstrained facial beauty prediction. Comput Intel Neurosc. 2019;2019:1910624.
Eisenthal Y, Dror G, Ruppin E. Facial attractiveness: beauty and the machine. Neural Comput. 2006;18(1):119‐142.
Laurentini A, Bottino A. Computer analysis of face beauty: a survey. Comput Vis Image Und. 2014;125:184‐199.
Patcas R, Bernini DAJ, Volokitin A, Agustsson E, Rothe R, Timofte R. Applying artificial intelligence to assess the impact of orthognathic treatment on facial attractiveness and estimated age. Int J Oral Max Surg. 2019;48(1):77‐83.
Patcas R, Timofte R, Volokitin A, et al. Facial attractiveness of cleft patients: a direct comparison between artificial‐intelligence‐based scoring and conventional rater groups. Eur J Orthodont. 2019;41(4):428‐433.
Mohammad‐Rahimi H, Nadimi M, Rohban MH, Shamsoddin E, Lee VY, Motamedian SR. Machine learning and orthodontics, current trends and the future opportunities: a scoping review. Am J Orthod Dentofac. 2021;160(2):170‐192.
Patcas R, Bornstein MM, Schatzle MA, Timofte R. Artificial intelligence in medico‐dental diagnostics of the face: a narrative review of opportunities and challenges. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(12):6871‐6879.
Chen K, Lu SM, Cheng R, et al. Facial recognition neural networks confirm success of facial feminization surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(1):203‐209.
Dorfman R, Chang I, Saadat S, Roostaeian J. Making the subjective objective: machine learning and rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;40(5):493‐498.
Khetpal S, Peck C, Parsaei Y, et al. Perceived age and attractiveness using facial recognition software in rhinoplasty patients: a proof‐of‐concept study. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(5):1540‐1544.
Rezende Machado AL, Dezem TU, Bruni AT, Alves da Silva RH. Age estimation by facial analysis based on applications available for smartphones. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2017;35(2):55‐65.
Talwar AA, Desai AA, McAuliffe PB, Broach RB, Percec I. 17. Artificially intelligent facial feature quantification after facial filler injection. Plast Reconstr Surg Global Open. 2022;10(6S):11.
Peck CJ, Patel VK, Parsaei Y, et al. Commercial artificial intelligence software as a tool for assessing facial attractiveness: a proof‐of‐concept study in an orthognathic surgery cohort. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2022;46(2):1013‐1016.
Boonipat T, Lin J, Bite U. Detection of baseline emotion in brow lift patients using artificial intelligence. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2021;45(6):2742‐2748.
Boonipat T, Hebel N, Zhu A, Lin J, Shapiro D. Using artificial intelligence to analyze emotion and facial action units following facial rejuvenation surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aes. 2022;75(9):3628‐3651.
Kuntzler T, Hofling TTA, Alpers GW. Automatic facial expression recognition in standardized and non‐standardized emotional expressions. Front Psychol. 2021;12:627561.
Jung S‐G, An J, Kwak H, Salminen J, Jansen B. Assessing the accuracy of four popular face recognition tools for inferring gender, age, and race. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. ICWSM. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI); 2018:12(1).
Li S, Guo L, Liu J. Towards east Asian facial expression recognition in the real world: a new database and deep recognition baseline. Sensors. 2022;22(21):8089.
Gupta N, Hughes SJ, Chirwa R, Cheng Q. Facial recognition software use on surgically altered faces: a systematic review. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(8):2443‐2446.
Golle J, Mast FW, Lobmaier JS. Something to smile about: the interrelationship between attractiveness and emotional expression. Cogn Emotion. 2014;28(2):298‐310.
Morrison ER, Morris PH, Bard KA. The stability of facial attractiveness: is it what You've got or what you do with it? J Nonverbal Behav. 2013;37(2):59‐67.
Ekman P. Facial expression and emotion. Am Psychol. 1993;48(4):384‐392.
Rothe R, Timofte R, Van Gool L. Some like it hot—visual guidance for preference prediction. Proceedings of Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE); 2016:5553‐61.
Mathias M, Benenson R, Pedersoli M, van Gool L. Face detection without bells and whistles. In: Fleet D, Pajdla T, Schiele B, Tuytelaars T, eds. Computer Vision–ECCV 2014. ECCV 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer International Publishing; 2014:720‐735. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10593-2_47
Huang G, Liu Z, Van Der Maaten L, Weinberger KQ. Densely connected convolutional networks. Proceedings of Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE);2017:2261‐69.
Russakovsky O, Deng J, Su H, et al. ImageNet large scale visual recognition challenge. Int J Comput Vision. 2015;115(3):211‐252.
Ma DS, Correll J, Wittenbrink B. The Chicago face database: a free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behav Res Methods. 2015;47(4):1122‐1135.
Graf ABA, Wichmann FA, Bülthoff HH, Schölkopf B. Classification of faces in man and machine. Neural Comput. 2006;18(1):143‐165.
Sutherland CAM, Young AW, Rhodes G. Facial first impressions from another angle: how social judgements are influenced by changeable and invariant facial properties. Brit J Psychol. 2017;108(2):397‐415.
Li J, He D, Zhou L, et al. The effects of facial attractiveness and familiarity on facial expression recognition. Front Psychol. 2019;10:Article 2496.
Tian JH, Xie HL, Hu SY, Liu J. Multidimensional face representation in a deep convolutional neural network reveals the mechanism underlying AI racism. Front Comput Neurosc. 2021;15:Article 620281.
Shan T, Tay FR, Gu L. Application of artificial intelligence in dentistry. J Dent Res. 2021;100(3):232‐244.
Pantic M, Rothkrantz LJM. Automatic analysis of facial expressions: the state of the art. IEEE T Pattern Anal. 2000;22(12):1424‐1445.
Obwegeser D, Timofte R, Mayer C, et al. Using artificial intelligence to determine the influence of dental aesthetics on facial attractiveness in comparison to other facial modifications. Eur J Orthodont. 2022;44(4):445‐451.
Little AC, Jones BC, DeBruine LM. Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research. Philos T R Soc B. 2011;366(1571):1638‐1659.
Al‐Omair OM, Huang SH. A comparative study on detection accuracy of cloud‐based emotion recognition services. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Signal Processing and Machine Learning. Association for Computing Machinery;2018:142‐148.
Zech JR, Badgeley MA, Liu M, Costa AB, Titano JJ, Oermann EK. Variable generalization performance of a deep learning model to detect pneumonia in chest radiographs: a cross‐sectional study. PLoS Med. 2018;15(11):e1002683.
Russell JA. Facial expressions of emotion: what lies beyond minimal universality? Psychol Bull. 1995;118(3):379‐391.
Elfenbein HA, Ambady N. On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: a meta‐analysis. Psychol Bull. 2002;128(2):203‐235.