Automatic segmentation of medial temporal lobe subregions in multi-scanner, multi-modality MRI of variable quality.

Background

Volumetry of subregions in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) computed from automatic segmentation in MRI can track neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease. However, image quality may vary in MRI. Poor quality MR images can lead to unreliable segmentation of MTL subregions. Considering that different MRI contrast mechanisms and field strengths (jointly referred to as "modalities" here) offer distinct advantages in imaging different parts of the MTL, we developed a muti-modality segmentation model using both 7 tesla (7T) and 3 tesla (3T) structural MRI to obtain robust segmentation in poorquality images.

Method

MRI modalities including 3T T1-weighted, 3T T2-weighted, 7T T1-weighted and 7T T2-weighted (7T-T2w) of 197 participants were collected from a longitudinal aging study at the Penn Alzheimer's Disease Research Center. Among them, 7T-T2w was used as the primary modality, and all other modalities were rigidly registered to the 7T-T2w. A model derived from nnU-Net took these registered modalities as input and outputted subregion segmentation in 7T-T2w space. 7T-T2w images most of which had high quality from 25 selected training participants were manually segmented to train the multi-modality model. Modality augmentation, which randomly replaced certain modalities with Gaussian noise, was applied during training to guide the model to extract information from all modalities. To compare our proposed model with a baseline single-modality model in the full dataset with mixed high/poor image quality, we evaluated the ability of derived volume/thickness measures to discriminate Amyloid+ mild cognitive impairment (A+MCI) and Amyloid-cognitively unimpaired (A-CU) groups, as well as the stability of these measurements in longitudinal data.

Results

The multi-modality model delivered good performance regardless of 7T-T2w quality, while the single-modality model under-segmented subregions in poor-quality images. The multi-modality model generally demonstrated stronger discrimination of A+MCI versus A-CU. Intra-class correlation and Bland-Altman plots demonstrate that the multi-modality model had higher longitudinal segmentation consistency in all subregions while the single-modality model had low consistency in poor-quality images.

Conclusion

The multi-modality MRI segmentation model provides an improved biomarker for neurodegeneration in the MTL that is robust to image quality. It also provides a framework for other studies which may benefit from multimodal imaging.