Treating refractory obsessive compulsive disorder with cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the supplementary motor area: a large multisite randomized sham-controlled double-blind study.

obsessive-compulsive disorder refractory supplementary motor area tDCS treatment

Journal

Frontiers in psychiatry
ISSN: 1664-0640
Titre abrégé: Front Psychiatry
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545006

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 14 11 2023
accepted: 29 04 2024
medline: 3 6 2024
pubmed: 3 6 2024
entrez: 3 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The present study evaluated the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of 10 transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) sessions in treatment-resistance obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients using a multisite double-blind sham-controlled design. Eighty treatment-resistance outpatients suffering from obsessive-compulsive disorder were randomized to receive either active or sham transcranial direct current stimulation. The cathode was positioned over the supplementary motor area and the anode over the right supraorbital area. Patients were evaluated at baseline, end of treatment (day 14), one-month follow-up (day 45), and three-month follow-up (day 105) on the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. Although a significant interaction between time and treatment was observed, the primary endpoint-measuring the change in Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale scores after two weeks-was not achieved. Conversely, the secondary endpoint, which concerned the change in Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale scores after three months, was successfully met. It is important to note, however, that there were no significant differences in the percentage of responders and remitters at any of the post-treatment assessments. This suggests that the treatment may not have had a clinically relevant impact. Patients well received the transcranial direct current stimulation treatment, indicating its good tolerability. This is the largest controlled trial using transcranial direct current stimulation in treatment-resistance obsessive-compulsive disorder patients. Our results indicate the importance of studying the placebo effect in transcranial direct current stimulation and the necessity to consider a long follow-up time to best evaluate the effects of the intervention. ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03304600.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
The present study evaluated the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of 10 transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) sessions in treatment-resistance obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients using a multisite double-blind sham-controlled design.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Eighty treatment-resistance outpatients suffering from obsessive-compulsive disorder were randomized to receive either active or sham transcranial direct current stimulation. The cathode was positioned over the supplementary motor area and the anode over the right supraorbital area. Patients were evaluated at baseline, end of treatment (day 14), one-month follow-up (day 45), and three-month follow-up (day 105) on the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale.
Results UNASSIGNED
Although a significant interaction between time and treatment was observed, the primary endpoint-measuring the change in Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale scores after two weeks-was not achieved. Conversely, the secondary endpoint, which concerned the change in Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale scores after three months, was successfully met. It is important to note, however, that there were no significant differences in the percentage of responders and remitters at any of the post-treatment assessments. This suggests that the treatment may not have had a clinically relevant impact. Patients well received the transcranial direct current stimulation treatment, indicating its good tolerability.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
This is the largest controlled trial using transcranial direct current stimulation in treatment-resistance obsessive-compulsive disorder patients. Our results indicate the importance of studying the placebo effect in transcranial direct current stimulation and the necessity to consider a long follow-up time to best evaluate the effects of the intervention.
Clinical trial registration UNASSIGNED
ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03304600.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38827437
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1338594
pmc: PMC11140596
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03304600']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1338594

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Harika-Germaneau, Heit, Drapier, Sauvaget, Bation, Chatard, Doolub, Wassouf, Langbour and Jaafari.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Ghina Harika-Germaneau (G)

Unité de Recherché Clinique Intersectorielle en Psychiatrie à vocation régionale du Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit, Poitiers, France.
Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS 7295), Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
HUGOPSY Network, Rennes, France.

Damien Heit (D)

Unité de Recherché Clinique Intersectorielle en Psychiatrie à vocation régionale du Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit, Poitiers, France.

Dominique Drapier (D)

HUGOPSY Network, Rennes, France.
Adult Psychiatry Department, Guillaume-Régnier Hospital, University of Rennes 1, Centre d'investigation Clinique (CIC) Inserm 1414, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.

Anne Sauvaget (A)

HUGOPSY Network, Rennes, France.
Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Mouvement, Interactions, Performance, MIP, UR 4334, Nantes, France.

Remy Bation (R)

Université Lyon 1, Lyon University, Villeurbanne, France.
INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, PSYR2 Team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Lyon, France.
Psychiatric Unit, Wertheimer Neurologic Hospital, Bron, France.

Armand Chatard (A)

Unité de Recherché Clinique Intersectorielle en Psychiatrie à vocation régionale du Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit, Poitiers, France.
Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS 7295), Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.

Damien Doolub (D)

Unité de Recherché Clinique Intersectorielle en Psychiatrie à vocation régionale du Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit, Poitiers, France.
Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS 7295), Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.

Issa Wassouf (I)

Unité de Recherché Clinique Intersectorielle en Psychiatrie à vocation régionale du Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit, Poitiers, France.
Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS 7295), Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Centre Hospitalier Nord Deux-Sèvres, Service de Psychiatrie Adulte, Thouars, France.

Nicolas Langbour (N)

Unité de Recherché Clinique Intersectorielle en Psychiatrie à vocation régionale du Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit, Poitiers, France.
Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS 7295), Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
HUGOPSY Network, Rennes, France.

Nematollah Jaafari (N)

Unité de Recherché Clinique Intersectorielle en Psychiatrie à vocation régionale du Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit, Poitiers, France.
Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS 7295), Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
HUGOPSY Network, Rennes, France.

Classifications MeSH