Language and reading in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder + developmental language disorder.

attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder developmental language disorder language sight word reading specific language impairment

Journal

JCPP advances
ISSN: 2692-9384
Titre abrégé: JCPP Adv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918250414706676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 04 04 2023
accepted: 20 11 2023
medline: 3 6 2024
pubmed: 3 6 2024
entrez: 3 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The current study sought to examine whether psycholinguistic assessments could discriminate children and adolescents with developmental language disorder (DLD) from those with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; combined or inattentive subtype) and comorbid DLD + ADHD. The Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-Screening Test (CELFST; Wiig et al., 2013), the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing ( The presence of a language disorder (with or without ADHD) predicted poor performance across tasks. Children and adolescents with ADHD (combined vs. inattentive) only significantly differed in sight word reading, in favor of those with combined type. Measures of reading efficiency could distinguish between the two types of ADHD, but not between other groups. Interestingly, scores on the standard language screener were no worse for children with ADHD + DLD than children with DLD only. The combination of comorbid ADHD + DLD did not appear to be associated with lower language abilities, sight word reading, or phonemic decoding relative to DLD alone. Reading efficiency was effective in discriminating between ADHD subtypes. These findings offer valuable insights into differential diagnosis and the identification of comorbidity.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
The current study sought to examine whether psycholinguistic assessments could discriminate children and adolescents with developmental language disorder (DLD) from those with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; combined or inattentive subtype) and comorbid DLD + ADHD.
Methods UNASSIGNED
The Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-Screening Test (CELFST; Wiig et al., 2013), the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (
Results UNASSIGNED
The presence of a language disorder (with or without ADHD) predicted poor performance across tasks. Children and adolescents with ADHD (combined vs. inattentive) only significantly differed in sight word reading, in favor of those with combined type. Measures of reading efficiency could distinguish between the two types of ADHD, but not between other groups. Interestingly, scores on the standard language screener were no worse for children with ADHD + DLD than children with DLD only.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
The combination of comorbid ADHD + DLD did not appear to be associated with lower language abilities, sight word reading, or phonemic decoding relative to DLD alone. Reading efficiency was effective in discriminating between ADHD subtypes. These findings offer valuable insights into differential diagnosis and the identification of comorbidity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38827980
doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12218
pii: JCV212218
pmc: PMC11143959
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e12218

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors. JCPP Advances published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that they have no competing or potential conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Kaitlyn M A Parks (KMA)

Department of Psychology Western University London Ontario Canada.
Brain and Mind Institute Western University London Ontario Canada.

Janis Oram Cardy (JO)

Brain and Mind Institute Western University London Ontario Canada.
School of Communication Sciences and Disorders Western University London Ontario Canada.

Marc F Joanisse (MF)

Department of Psychology Western University London Ontario Canada.
Brain and Mind Institute Western University London Ontario Canada.

Classifications MeSH