Effect of post-operative NSAID use on rotator cuff repair outcomes.

Arthroscopy Ibuprofen NSAID Rotator cuff Shoulder

Journal

Journal of orthopaedics
ISSN: 0972-978X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101233220

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 29 04 2024
accepted: 12 05 2024
pmc-release: 01 10 2025
medline: 3 6 2024
pubmed: 3 6 2024
entrez: 3 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The impact of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on rotator cuff repair is an ongoing area of study within orthopedics, with conflicting results in current literature. Despite concerns over the deleterious effects of NSAIDs on rotator cuff healing, they are becoming an integral part of a multimodal post-operative pain control regiment. The purpose of this study was to compare post-operative patient-reported outcomes (PROs), complications rates, and retear rates of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs in patients using ibuprofen post-operatively to those who abstained from NSAIDs for six weeks after surgery. It was hypothesized that a short course of ibuprofen post-operatively would not lead to inferior PRO scores, increased retear rates, nor increased complication rates after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Patients of the primary surgeon who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between 2012 and 2022 were evaluated by retrospective chart review. In May 2017 the primary surgeon changed his protocol from avoiding NSAIDs for six weeks after surgery to routinely prescribing two weeks of Ibuprofen 800 mg TID post-operatively. Patients who avoided NSAIDs for six weeks were compared to patients who were prescribed NSAIDs post-operatively. Patient demographic data, pre-operative MRI results, pre-operative and post-operative PROs were collected from the EMR. Additionally, post-operative complications and repair failures requiring reoperation within one year were evaluated. 125 patients met inclusion criteria for this study with 36 patients in the NSAID group and 89 in the no NSAID group. When comparing improvement in PROs, the NSAID group reached MCID at one year in 83.8 % of patients and the no NSAID group reached MCID at one year in 73.9 % of patients. There was no significant difference between the groups in reaching MCID improvement at one year (p = 0.471). Five post-operative complications were reported in the no NSAID group and two in the NSAID group (5.7 % vs 5.4 %, respectively, p = 0.827). Finally, there was no significant difference in the percentage of post-operative rotator cuff repair failures requiring revision in the first year between the groups (2.3 % vs 2.7 %, p = 1.000). There was no difference in percent of patients improving their PRO by the MCID between the groups that used ibuprofen and the group that did not. There was also no difference in post-operative complication rates and rates of symptomatic retear requiring reoperation between the groups. This supports that a short course of NSAIDs post-operatively, specifically ibuprofen, after rotator cuff repair does not increase reoperation rates nor lead to a clinically significant decrease in PROs at one year.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
The impact of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on rotator cuff repair is an ongoing area of study within orthopedics, with conflicting results in current literature. Despite concerns over the deleterious effects of NSAIDs on rotator cuff healing, they are becoming an integral part of a multimodal post-operative pain control regiment. The purpose of this study was to compare post-operative patient-reported outcomes (PROs), complications rates, and retear rates of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs in patients using ibuprofen post-operatively to those who abstained from NSAIDs for six weeks after surgery. It was hypothesized that a short course of ibuprofen post-operatively would not lead to inferior PRO scores, increased retear rates, nor increased complication rates after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Patients of the primary surgeon who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between 2012 and 2022 were evaluated by retrospective chart review. In May 2017 the primary surgeon changed his protocol from avoiding NSAIDs for six weeks after surgery to routinely prescribing two weeks of Ibuprofen 800 mg TID post-operatively. Patients who avoided NSAIDs for six weeks were compared to patients who were prescribed NSAIDs post-operatively. Patient demographic data, pre-operative MRI results, pre-operative and post-operative PROs were collected from the EMR. Additionally, post-operative complications and repair failures requiring reoperation within one year were evaluated.
Results UNASSIGNED
125 patients met inclusion criteria for this study with 36 patients in the NSAID group and 89 in the no NSAID group. When comparing improvement in PROs, the NSAID group reached MCID at one year in 83.8 % of patients and the no NSAID group reached MCID at one year in 73.9 % of patients. There was no significant difference between the groups in reaching MCID improvement at one year (p = 0.471). Five post-operative complications were reported in the no NSAID group and two in the NSAID group (5.7 % vs 5.4 %, respectively, p = 0.827). Finally, there was no significant difference in the percentage of post-operative rotator cuff repair failures requiring revision in the first year between the groups (2.3 % vs 2.7 %, p = 1.000).
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
There was no difference in percent of patients improving their PRO by the MCID between the groups that used ibuprofen and the group that did not. There was also no difference in post-operative complication rates and rates of symptomatic retear requiring reoperation between the groups. This supports that a short course of NSAIDs post-operatively, specifically ibuprofen, after rotator cuff repair does not increase reoperation rates nor lead to a clinically significant decrease in PROs at one year.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38828472
doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.05.019
pii: S0972-978X(24)00179-X
pmc: PMC11141046
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

119-122

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.

Auteurs

Adam Hadro (A)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, St. Louis Park, MN, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, TRIA Orthopaedic Institute, Bloomington, MN, USA.

Fernando A Huyke-Hernandez (FA)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, St. Louis Park, MN, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, TRIA Orthopaedic Institute, Bloomington, MN, USA.

Rebekah M Kleinsmith (RM)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, St. Louis Park, MN, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, TRIA Orthopaedic Institute, Bloomington, MN, USA.

Stephen A Doxey (SA)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, St. Louis Park, MN, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, TRIA Orthopaedic Institute, Bloomington, MN, USA.

Adam Schweitzer (A)

College of Osteopathic Medicine, Des Moines University, Des Moines, IA, USA.

Jacob Ristow (J)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Brian P Cunningham (BP)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, St. Louis Park, MN, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, TRIA Orthopaedic Institute, Bloomington, MN, USA.

Jonathan Braman (J)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford, Detroit, MI, USA.

Classifications MeSH