Is there a best choice of equipment for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection?

ESD Polyps complications devices knives tractions

Journal

Expert review of medical devices
ISSN: 1745-2422
Titre abrégé: Expert Rev Med Devices
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101230445

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Jun 2024
Historique:
medline: 3 6 2024
pubmed: 3 6 2024
entrez: 3 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely used technique to remove early neoplastic lesions. It was primarily used in the initial days to treat gastric lesions, but recently, the horizon of this endoscopic procedure has expanded, that has allowed us to manage other technically more complex locations, such as the colorectum. There has been an exponential growth regarding the wide range of devices available in the market for performing colorectal ESD. As a result, the aim of the review is to highlight the indication of this endoscopic technique, which device is best suited for which indication, as well as future trajectories in this field. Although some devices have proven to be more advantageous than others in this area, very often the choice is still subjective, which is commonly attributed to individual preferences and experience. However, an accurate knowledge of the available tools and their functioning, with their pros and cons, is fundamental for any endoscopist venturing into the field of third space endoscopy. In this way, one can choose which device best suits a particular situation, along with simultaneously having the wealth of knowledge related to therapeutic armamentarium at our disposal in the endoscopy suite.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38829122
doi: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2364022
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Francesco Cocomazzi (F)

Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy.

Sonia Carparelli (S)

Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy.

Nunzia Labarile (N)

National Institute of Gastroenterology - IRCCS "Saverio de Bellis" - Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy.

Antonio Capogreco (A)

Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS - Rozzano, Italy.

Marco Gentile (M)

Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy.

Roberta Maselli (R)

Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS - Rozzano, Italy.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University - Rozzano, Italy.

Jahnvi Dhar (J)

Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Jayanta Samanta (J)

Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Alessandro Repici (A)

Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS - Rozzano, Italy.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University - Rozzano, Italy.

Cesare Hassan (C)

Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS - Rozzano, Italy.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University - Rozzano, Italy.

Francesco Perri (F)

Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy.

Antonio Facciorusso (A)

Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Gastroenterology, Foggia, Italy.

Classifications MeSH