Robustness evaluation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy treatment planning: A systematic review.
Proton therapy
Protontherapy
Robust planning
Robustness
Robustness analysis
Robustness evaluation
Treatment planning guidelines
Journal
Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
ISSN: 1879-0887
Titre abrégé: Radiother Oncol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8407192
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jun 2024
01 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
09
08
2023
revised:
30
04
2024
accepted:
29
05
2024
medline:
4
6
2024
pubmed:
4
6
2024
entrez:
3
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Compared to conventional radiotherapy using X-rays, proton therapy, in principle, allows better conformity of the dose distribution to target volumes, at the cost of greater sensitivity to physical, anatomical, and positioning uncertainties. Robust planning, both in terms of plan optimization and evaluation, has gained high visibility in publications on the subject and is part of clinical practice in many centers. However, there is currently no consensus on the methods and parameters to be used for robust optimization or robustness evaluation. We propose to overcome this deficiency by following the modified Delphi consensus method. This method first requires a systematic review of the literature. We performed this review using the PubMed and Web Of Science databases, via two different experts. Potential conflicts were resolved by a third expert. We then explored the different methods before focusing on clinical studies that evaluate robustness on a significant number of patients. Many robustness assessment methods are proposed in the literature. Some are more successful than others and their implementation varies between centers. Moreover, they are not all statistically or mathematically equivalent. The most sophisticated and rigorous methods have seen more limited application due to the difficulty of their implementation and their lack of widespread availability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38830538
pii: S0167-8140(24)00635-2
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110365
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
110365Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Edmond Sterpin is involved in collaborations with Ion Beam Applications and RaySearch laboratories. Erik Korevaar is involved in collaborations with Ion Beam Applications and RaySearch laboratories. Mischa Hoogeman is involved in collaborations with RaySearch laboratories, Varian, Siemens, Accuray, and Elekta.