Evidence gaps and challenges in maintaining and increasing vaccine uptake: A Delphi survey with Australian stakeholders.
Delphi method
behavioural research
immunisation
infectious disease
vaccines
Journal
Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals
ISSN: 1036-1073
Titre abrégé: Health Promot J Austr
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9710936
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Jun 2024
03 Jun 2024
Historique:
revised:
30
01
2024
received:
04
07
2023
accepted:
11
05
2024
medline:
4
6
2024
pubmed:
4
6
2024
entrez:
3
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Increasing and maintaining vaccination uptake is crucial for preventing and managing infectious diseases. In the context of the post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic landscape, this paper examines the perceptions of immunisation implementers and policymakers to uncover the challenges and evidence gaps in routine immunisation efforts. We conducted an online two-round modified Delphi survey with immunisation experts, senior public servants, policymakers, policy advisory groups, and representatives from peak bodies from across Australia. We asked respondents to outline what they see as the greatest challenges to increasing and maintaining uptake of recommended vaccines in Australia; the most difficult aspects of their work in vaccination; the largest evidence gaps in vaccine uptake; and the kinds of social and behavioural research they would like to see prioritised. The two most important challenges for increasing and maintaining vaccine uptake were effectively communicating the benefits of vaccines to parents and the public and ensuring accessible and affordable vaccination services. Participants strongly agreed that 'communication about the importance of vaccination' was the most difficult aspect of their work. Consistently important was the need to better engage specific population groups, such as culturally and linguistically diverse people, pregnant people, at risk cohorts, and health care providers. Social and behavioural research about 'how to effectively address hesitancy' was ranked highly among participants. Findings from this project help provide an understanding of the behavioural, social, ethical, and policy knowledge needs for immunisation policy and implementation in Australia. To respond to vaccine challenges, increase coverage and build public trust in vaccination, policymakers and governments should incorporate social research into vaccination programmes. SO WHAT?: Australia is preparing to launch a Centre for Disease Control. This study demonstrates the importance of integrating social, behavioural, ethical, and policy research into the fabric of this new enterprise. It underlines the need to capacity-build a workforce able to deliver high-quality research in these areas, address the needs of immunisation implementers and policymakers, and achieve good outcomes for Australians.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) and WHO
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s). Health Promotion Journal of Australia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Health Promotion Association.
Références
Feldman AG, O'Leary ST, Danziger‐Isakov L. The risk of resurgence in vaccine‐preventable infections due to coronavirus disease 2019‐related gaps in immunization. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(10):1920–1923. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab127
Levin HY, Kershner SP, Lytton TD, Salmon D, Omer SB. Stopping the resurgence of vaccine‐preventable childhood diseases: policy, politics, and law. Univ Ill Law Rev. 2020;2020(1):233–272.
Shapiro GK, Gottfredson N, Leask J, Wiley K, Ganter‐Restrepo FE, Jones SP, et al. COVID‐19 and missed or delayed vaccination in 26 middle‐ and high‐income countries: an observational survey. Vaccine. 2022;40:945–952.
UNICEF. COVID‐19 pandemic fuels largest continued backslide in vaccinations in three decades; 2022.
UNICEF. New data indicates declining confidence in childhood vaccines of up to 44 percentage points in some countries during the COVID‐19 pandemic. New York: UNICEF; 2023.
Thomson A. Confidence in childhood vaccines declines in Australia, worldwide. Sydney: Sydney Morning Herald; 2023.
DoHaA C, editor. Australian Government Department of Health and aged care. Childhood immunisation coverage. Canberra: Australian Government; 2023.
Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. Historical coverage data tables for all children; 2023 [updated 2023 Apr 21; cited 2023 Dec 4]. Available from: https://www.health.gov.au/topics/immunisation/immunisation‐data/childhood‐immunisation‐coverage/historical‐coverage‐data‐tables‐for‐all‐children
National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance. National influenza vaccination coverage – all people. Westmead, Sydney: NCIRS; 2023.
Attwell K, Hannah A, Leask J. COVID‐19: talk of ‘vaccine hesitancy’ lets governments off the hook. Nature. 2022;602(7898):574–577. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00495-8
Wostenholme A, Smith C. Community attitude research on childhood vaccination 2022 – research report. Crows Nest, New South Wales: Snapcracker; 2022.
Ziglio E. The Delphi method and its contribution to decision‐making. In: Adler M, Ziglio E, editors. Gazing into the oracle: the Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 1996.
Degeling C, Johnson J, Gilbert GL. Perspectives of Australian policy‐makers on the potential benefits and risks of technologically enhanced communicable disease surveillance – a modified Delphi survey. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2019;17(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0440-3
Degeling C, Johnson J, Ward M, Wilson A, Gilbert G. A Delphi survey and analysis of expert perspectives on one health in Australia. Ecohealth. 2017;14(4):783–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-017-1264-7
Kaufman J, Ryan R, Lewin S, Bosch‐Capblanch X, Glenton C, Cliff J, et al. Identification of preliminary core outcome domains for communication about childhood vaccination: an online Delphi survey. Vaccine. 2018;36(44):6520–6528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.08.027
Sawford K, Dhand NK, Toribio JA, Taylor MR. The use of a modified Delphi approach to engage stakeholders in zoonotic disease research priority setting. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:182. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-182
Wilkes L. Using the Delphi technique in nursing research. Nurs Stand. 2015;29(39):43–49. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.29.39.43.e8804
Robinson P, Wiley K, Degeling C. Public health practitioner perspectives on dealing with measles outbreaks if high anti‐vaccination sentiment is present. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:578.
Robinson SM, Walker BF, Brown RM. Which adverse events should be reported in an emergency department? A Delphi study. Eur J Emerg Med. 2017;24(2):108–113. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000308
Qualtrics. Qualtrics Utah, USA; 2023. Available from: https://www.qualtrics.com2023
Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, editor. COVID‐19 vaccine rollout update 12 January 2024. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care; 2024.
Sackman H. Delphi critique; expert opinion, forecasting, and group process. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books; 1974.
Landeta J. Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 2006;73(5):467–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2005.09.002
Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. In: Medicare Benefits & Digital Health Division, editor. Total Medicare Statistics, 2022–23 Jul–Jun YTD. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care; 2023.