Evaluation of flow diverters for cerebral aneurysm therapy: recommendations for imaging analyses in clinical studies, endorsed by ESMINT, ESNR, OCIN, SILAN, SNIS, and WFITN.

Aneurysm Angiography Flow Diverter Standards Subarachnoid

Journal

Journal of neurointerventional surgery
ISSN: 1759-8486
Titre abrégé: J Neurointerv Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517079

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 29 12 2023
accepted: 02 04 2024
medline: 4 6 2024
pubmed: 4 6 2024
entrez: 3 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Multiple studies and meta-analyses have described the technical and clinical outcomes in large cohorts of aneurysm patients treated with flow diverters (FDs). Variations in evaluation methodology complicate making comparisons among studies, hinder understanding of the device behavior, and pose an obstacle in the assessment of further advances in FD therapy. A multidisciplinary panel of neurointerventionalists, imaging experts, and neuroradiologists convened with the goal of establishing consensus recommendations for the standardization of image analyses in FD studies. A standardized methodology is proposed for evaluating and reporting radiological outcomes of FD treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The recommendations include general imaging considerations for clinical studies and evaluations of longitudinal changes, such as neointimal lining and stenosis. They cover standards for classification of aneurysm location, morphology, measurements, as well as the assessment of aneurysm occlusion, wall apposition, and neck coverage. These reporting standards further define four specific braid deformation patterns: foreshortening, fish-mouthing, braid bump deformation, and braid collapse, collectively termed 'F2B2'. When widely applied, standardization of methods of measuring and reporting outcomes will help to harmonize the assessment of treatment outcomes in clinical studies, help facilitate communication of results among specialists, and help enable research and development to focus on specific aspects of FD techniques and technology.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Multiple studies and meta-analyses have described the technical and clinical outcomes in large cohorts of aneurysm patients treated with flow diverters (FDs). Variations in evaluation methodology complicate making comparisons among studies, hinder understanding of the device behavior, and pose an obstacle in the assessment of further advances in FD therapy.
METHODS METHODS
A multidisciplinary panel of neurointerventionalists, imaging experts, and neuroradiologists convened with the goal of establishing consensus recommendations for the standardization of image analyses in FD studies.
RESULTS RESULTS
A standardized methodology is proposed for evaluating and reporting radiological outcomes of FD treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The recommendations include general imaging considerations for clinical studies and evaluations of longitudinal changes, such as neointimal lining and stenosis. They cover standards for classification of aneurysm location, morphology, measurements, as well as the assessment of aneurysm occlusion, wall apposition, and neck coverage. These reporting standards further define four specific braid deformation patterns: foreshortening, fish-mouthing, braid bump deformation, and braid collapse, collectively termed 'F2B2'.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
When widely applied, standardization of methods of measuring and reporting outcomes will help to harmonize the assessment of treatment outcomes in clinical studies, help facilitate communication of results among specialists, and help enable research and development to focus on specific aspects of FD techniques and technology.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38830670
pii: jnis-2023-021404
doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-021404
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: JF: Research support: German Ministry of Science & Education (BMBF) and of Economy and Innovation (BMWi), German Research Foundation (DFG), European Union (EU), Hamburgische Investitions- und Förderbank (IFB), Medtronic, Microvention, Route92, Stryker. Consultant for: Acandis, Cerenovus, Medtronic, Microvention, Penumbra, Phenox, Roche, Stryker, TG Med, Tonbridge. Stockholder: Tegus Medical, Vastrax, Eppdata. DF: Medtronic – Consulting, Proctoring, Cerenovous – Consulting, Microvention – Consulting, Proctoring, Research Support, Penumbra – Consulting, Research Support, Stryker – Consulting, Research Support, Balt USA – Consulting, Research Support, Siemens – Research Support, MENTICE-Vascular Simulations – Consultant, Neurogami – Stockholder, Consultant, RAPID. AI – Consultant, RAPID Medical – Consultant, Qapel Medical –Consultant, Arsenal Medical – Consultant, Phenox Medical – Consultant, Scientia Medical – SAB, Consultant, Stockholder, NVMed – SAB, Stockholder, Perfuze – SAB, Consultant, Stockholder, Vesalio - ConsultantIS: Consulting and proctoring agreement with Medtronic & Microvention. SH: Consulting and proctoring agreement with Medtronic & Microvention. Stocks: Neuravention Inc., Vesalio Inc., Synchron Inc., Bend It Technologies, Sim & Size Inc., Borvo Medical Inc., Prometheus Inc., Piraeus Inc., Neuros Medical Inc. MJG: (1) Consultant on a fee-per-hour basis for Alembic, Astrocyte Pharmaceuticals, BendIt Technologies, Cerenovus, Imperative Care, Jacob’s Institute, Medtronic Neurovascular, Mivi Neurosciences, Phenox GMbH, Q’Apel, Route 92 Medical, Scientia, Simcerre, Stryker Neurovascular, Stryker Sustainability Solutions, Wallaby Medical; holds stock in Imperative Care, InNeuroCo, Galaxy Therapeutics, Kapto, Neurogami and Synchron; (2) Research support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the United States–Israel Binational Science Foundation, Anaconda, ApicBio, Arsenal Medical, Axovant, Balt, Cerenovus, Ceretrieve, CereVasc, Cook Medical, Galaxy Therapeutics, Gentuity, Gilbert Foundation, Imperative Care, InNeuroCo, Insera, Jacob’s Institute, Magneto, MicroBot, Microvention, Medtronic Neurovascular, MIVI Neurosciences, Naglreiter MDDO, Neurogami, Q’Apel, Philips Healthcare, Progressive Medical, Pulse Medical, Rapid Medical, Route 92 Medical, Scientia, Stryker Neurovascular, Syntheon, ThrombX Medical, Wallaby Medical, the Wyss Institute, Xtract Medical; and (3) Associate Editor of Basic Science on the JNIS Editorial Board.

Auteurs

Jens Fiehler (J)

Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany fiehler@uke.de.

Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez (S)

Neurology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Neurosurgery and Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Vania Anagnostakou (V)

Department of Radiology, New England Center for Stroke Research, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.

Jonathan Cortese (J)

Interventional Neuroradiology, Biĉetre Hospital, Le Kremlin Biĉetre, France.
UMR CNRS No. 7252, XLIM, Limoges, France.

H Saruhan Cekirge (HS)

Radiology, Koru Health Group, Ankara, Turkey.
Private Office, Saruhan Cekirge, Ankara, Turkey.

David Fiorella (D)

Department of Neurosurgery, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.

Ricardo Hanel (R)

Stroke & Cerebrovascular Center, Baptist Neurological Institute and Lyerly Neurosurgery, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.

Zsolt Kulcsar (Z)

Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Saleh Lamin (S)

Interventional Neuroradiology and Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Neuroradiology, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Jianmin Liu (J)

Neurosurgery, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Pedro Lylyk (P)

Interventional Neuroradiology, Clinical Institute ENERI, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Franklin A Marden (FA)

Alexian Brothers Medical Center, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, USA.

Vitor M Pereira (VM)

Department of Neurosurgery, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Marios-Nikos Psychogios (MN)

Department of Neuroradiology, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Hal Rice (H)

Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia.

Aymeric Rouchaud (A)

Interventional Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges, Limoges, France.
University of Limoges, CNRS, XLIM, UMR 7252, Limoges, France.

Isil Saatci (I)

Radiology, Koru Health Group, Ankara, Turkey.

Adnan H Siddiqui (AH)

Neurosurgery and Radiology, and Canon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA.

Laurent Spelle (L)

Interventional Neuroradiology, NEURI Brain Vascular Center, Biĉetre Hospital, Le Kremlin Biĉetre, France.
Paris-Saclay University Faculty of Medicine, Le Kremlin Biĉetre, France.

Pengfei Yang (P)

Department of Neurosurgery, Naval Medical University Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.

Astrid Grams (A)

Department of Neuroradiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Matthew J Gounis (MJ)

Department of Radiology, New England Center for Stroke Research, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.

Classifications MeSH