International consensus panel for transurethral resection of bladder tumours metrics: assessment of face and content validity.
bladder cancer
performance metrics
proficiency‐based progression training
surgical education
transurethral resection of bladder tumours
Journal
BJU international
ISSN: 1464-410X
Titre abrégé: BJU Int
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100886721
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Jun 2024
03 Jun 2024
Historique:
medline:
4
6
2024
pubmed:
4
6
2024
entrez:
3
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To develop performance metrics that objectively define a reference approach to a transurethral resection of bladder tumours (TURBT) procedure, seek consensus on the performance metrics from a group of international experts. The characterisation of a reference approach to a TURBT procedure was performed by identifying phases and explicitly defined procedure events (i.e., steps, errors, and critical errors). An international panel of experienced urologists (i.e., Delphi panel) was then assembled to scrutinise the metrics using a modified Delphi process. Based on the panel's feedback, the proposed metrics could be edited, supplemented, or deleted. A voting process was conducted to establish the consensus level on the metrics. Consensus was defined as the panel majority (i.e., >80%) agreeing that the metric definitions were accurate and acceptable. The number of metric units before and after the Delphi meeting were presented. A core metrics group (i.e., characterisation group) deconstructed the TURBT procedure. The reference case was identified as an elective TURBT on a male patient, diagnosed after full diagnostic evaluation with three or fewer bladder tumours of ≤3 cm. The characterisation group identified six procedure phases, 60 procedure steps, 43 errors, and 40 critical errors. The metrics were presented to the Delphi panel which included 15 experts from six countries. After the Delphi, six procedure phases, 63 procedure steps, 47 errors, and 41 critical errors were identified. The Delphi panel achieved a 100% consensus. Performance metrics to characterise a reference approach to TURBT were developed and an international panel of experts reached 100% consensus on them. This consensus supports their face and content validity. The metrics can now be used for a proficiency-based progression training curriculum for TURBT.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Erasmus+
Informations de copyright
© 2024 BJU International.
Références
Babjuk M, Burger M, Capoun O et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (Ta, T1, and carcinoma in situ). Eur Urol 2022; 81: 75–94
Mostafid H, Kamat AM, Daneshmand S et al. Best practices to optimise quality and outcomes of transurethral resection of bladder tumours. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 4: 12–19
Mostafid H, Babjuk M, Bochner B et al. Transurethral resection of bladder tumour: the neglected procedure in the technology race in bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2020; 77: 669–670
Lee F, Patel HR, Emberton M. The ‘top 10’ urological procedures: a study of hospital episodes statistics 1998‐99. BJU Int 2002; 90: 1–6
Carrion DM, Rodriguez‐Socarrás ME, Mantica G et al. Current status of urology surgical training in Europe: an ESRU‐ESU‐ESUT collaborative study. World J Urol 2020; 38: 239–246
Borgmann H, Arnold HK, Meyer CP et al. Training, research, and working conditions for urology residents in Germany: a contemporary survey. Eur Urol Focus 2018; 4: 455–460
Cocci A, Patruno G, Gandaglia G et al. Urology residency training in Italy: results of the first National Survey. Eur Urol Focus 2018; 4: 280–287
Haddad J, Anderson C, Heinlen J et al. Improving the quality of operative reports for transurethral resection of bladder tumor surgery in resident education. Can J Urol 2017; 24: 8976–8981
Bos D, Allard CB, Dason S, Ruzhynsky V, Kapoor A, Shayegan B. Impact of resident involvement in endoscopic bladder cancer surgery on pathological outcomes. Scand J Urol 2016; 50: 234–238
Allard CB, Meyer CP, Gandaglia G et al. The effect of resident involvement on perioperative outcomes in transurethral urologic surgeries. J Surg Educ 2015; 72: 1018–1025
El Hayek OR, Coelho RF, Dall'oglio MF et al. Evaluation of the incidence of bladder perforation after transurethral bladder tumor resection in a residency setting. J Endourol 2009; 23: 1183–1186
Rouprêt M, Yates DR, Varinot J et al. The presence of detrusor muscle in the pathological specimen after transurethral resection of primary pT1 bladder tumors and its relationship to operator experience. Can J Urol 2012; 19: 6459–6464
Jancke G, Rosell J, Jahnson S. Impact of surgical experience on recurrence and progression after transurethral resection of bladder tumour in non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer. Scand J Urol 2014; 48: 276–283
Nayahangan LJ, Bølling Hansen R, Gilboe Lindorff‐Larsen K, Paltved C, Nielsen BU, Konge L. Identifying content for simulation‐based curricula in urology: a national needs assessment. Scand J Urol 2017; 51: 484–490
Buffi N, Paciotti M, Gallagher AG et al. European training in urology (ENTRY): quality‐assured training for European urology residents. BJU Int 2023; 131: 177–178
Gallagher AG, De Groote R, Paciotti M, Mottrie A. Proficiency‐based progression training: a scientific approach to learning surgical skills. Eur Urol 2022; 81: 394–395
Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H et al. Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency‐based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg 2005; 241: 364–372
Farinha R, Breda A, Porter J et al. International expert consensus on metric‐based characterization of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9: 388–395
Gallagher AG, O'Sullivan GC, Leonard G, Bunting BP, McGlade KJ. Objective structured assessment of technical skills and checklist scales reliability compared for high stakes assessments. ANZ J Surg 2014; 84: 568–573
Mazzone E, Puliatti S, Amato M et al. A systematic review and meta‐analysis on the impact of proficiency‐based progression simulation training on performance outcomes. Ann Surg 2021; 274: 281–289
Brausi M, Collette L, Kurth K et al. Variability in the recurrence rate at first follow‐up cystoscopy after TUR in stage Ta T1 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a combined analysis of seven EORTC studies. Eur Urol 2002; 41: 523–531
Mariappan P, Zachou A, Grigor KM, Edinburgh Uro‐Oncology Group. Detrusor muscle in the first, apparently complete transurethral resection of bladder tumour specimen is a surrogate marker of resection quality, predicts risk of early recurrence, and is dependent on operator experience. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 843–849
Mariappan P, Johnston A, Padovani L et al. Enhanced quality and effectiveness of transurethral resection of bladder tumour in non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: a multicentre real‐world experience from Scotland's quality performance indicators programme. Eur Urol 2020; 78: 520–530
Mariappan P, Finney SM, Head E et al. Good quality white‐light transurethral resection of bladder tumours (GQ‐WLTURBT) with experienced surgeons performing complete resections and obtaining detrusor muscle reduces early recurrence in new non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: validation across time and place and recommendation for benchmarking. BJU Int 2012; 109: 1666–1673
Bebane S, Denize J, Goujon A et al. Perioperative outcomes of transurethral resection for t1 bladder tumors: quality evaluation based on patient, tumor and surgeon criteria. World J Urol 2021; 39: 4159–4165
Sloan FA, Yashkin AP, Akushevich I, Inman BA. The cost to medicare of bladder cancer care. Eur Urol Oncol 2020; 3: 515–522
Suarez‐Ibarrola R, Soria F, Abufaraj M et al. Surgical checklist impact on recurrence‐free survival of patients with non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumour. BJU Int 2019; 123: 646–650
Anderson C, Weber R, Patel D et al. A 10‐item checklist improves reporting of critical procedural elements during transurethral resection of bladder tumor. J Urol 2016; 196: 1014–1020
Taoka R, Tsunemori H, Matsuoka Y et al. Use of surgical checklist during transurethral resection increases detrusor muscle collection rate and improves recurrence‐free survival in patients with non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer. Int J Urol 2021; 28: 727–732
Diana P, Baboudjian M, Gallioli A et al. Implementing a checklist for transurethral resection of bladder tumor to standardize outcome reporting: when high‐quality resection could influence oncological outcomes. Eur Urol Open Sci 2022; 48: 24–27
Del Giudice F, D'Andrea D, Pradere B et al. Surgical checklist adherence across urology expertise levels impacts transurethral resection of bladder tumour quality indicators. BJU Int 2023; 131: 712–719
Breda A, Gallioli A, Diana P et al. The DEpth of endoscopic perforation scale to assess intraoperative perforations during transurethral resection of bladder tumor: subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial. World J Urol 2022; 41: 2583–2589
Paciotti M, Gallagher AG, Mottrie A. Current landscape of surgical assessment models in urology residency training. Letter. J Urol 2023; 210: 252–253
Somani B, Brouwers T, Veneziano D et al. Standardization in surgical education (SISE): development and implementation of an innovative training program for urologic surgery residents and trainers by the European School of Urology in collaboration with the ESUT and EULIS sections of the EAU. Eur Urol 2021; 79: 433–434
Curtis NJ, Foster JD, Miskovic D et al. Association of surgical skill assessment with clinical outcomes in cancer surgery. JAMA Surg 2020; 155: 590–598
Paciotti M, Casale P, Colombo P et al. Long‐term follow‐up after En bloc transurethral resection of non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: results from a single‐center experience. Eur Urol Open Sci 2021; 26: 64–71
Diana P, Gallioli A, Fontana M et al. Energy source comparison in en‐bloc resection of bladder tumors: subanalysis of a single‐center prospective randomized study. World J Urol 2022; 41: 2591–2597