Clinical outcomes of single- versus two-stent PCI technique in severely calcified true bifurcation lesions after rotational atherectomy.
Calcified coronary lesions
Left main vessel
Rotational atherectomy
True bifurcation
Journal
Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society
ISSN: 1861-0692
Titre abrégé: Clin Res Cardiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101264123
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Jun 2024
04 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
13
03
2024
accepted:
08
05
2024
medline:
4
6
2024
pubmed:
4
6
2024
entrez:
4
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Severely calcified coronary bifurcations complicate percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and often necessitate dedicated lesion preparation. We compared the outcomes of single- versus two-stent techniques for treating heavily calcified true bifurcation lesions following rotational atherectomy (RA). Among patients receiving RA for severely calcified true bifurcations at a single center, 59 were treated with a single stent, and another 59 received two stents. We analyzed in-hospital adverse outcomes and 1-year rates of the bifurcation-oriented composite endpoint (BOCE), defined as cardiac death, target bifurcation myocardial infarction (TB-MI), or target bifurcation revascularization (TBR). The single-stent arm was associated with more in-hospital adverse outcomes (adj. OR, 6.13; 95% CI, 1.34-28.0; p = 0.019), driven by higher peri-procedural MI rates (18.6% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.043) and more side branch compromise (13.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.006). After 1 year, both techniques had comparable 1-year BOCE (adj. HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.12-1.23; p = 0.106). We observed a significant interaction between the treatment technique and the presence of LM bifurcation (p interaction = 0.012), favoring single-stent technique in patients with non-LM bifurcations (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.68; p = 0.015). Notably, the single-stent technique had lower rates of TBR (2% vs. 15%, p log-rank = 0.026) after 1 year. Patients with severely calcified true bifurcation lesions, treated with RA followed by a single stent implantation, had more in-hospital adverse outcomes compared to those treated with two stents. However, the superior outcomes of the two-stent technique did not translate into improved long-term results. In fact, the two-stent technique was even associated with higher rates of revascularization after 1 year.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Severely calcified coronary bifurcations complicate percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and often necessitate dedicated lesion preparation. We compared the outcomes of single- versus two-stent techniques for treating heavily calcified true bifurcation lesions following rotational atherectomy (RA).
METHODS
METHODS
Among patients receiving RA for severely calcified true bifurcations at a single center, 59 were treated with a single stent, and another 59 received two stents. We analyzed in-hospital adverse outcomes and 1-year rates of the bifurcation-oriented composite endpoint (BOCE), defined as cardiac death, target bifurcation myocardial infarction (TB-MI), or target bifurcation revascularization (TBR).
RESULTS
RESULTS
The single-stent arm was associated with more in-hospital adverse outcomes (adj. OR, 6.13; 95% CI, 1.34-28.0; p = 0.019), driven by higher peri-procedural MI rates (18.6% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.043) and more side branch compromise (13.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.006). After 1 year, both techniques had comparable 1-year BOCE (adj. HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.12-1.23; p = 0.106). We observed a significant interaction between the treatment technique and the presence of LM bifurcation (p interaction = 0.012), favoring single-stent technique in patients with non-LM bifurcations (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.68; p = 0.015). Notably, the single-stent technique had lower rates of TBR (2% vs. 15%, p log-rank = 0.026) after 1 year.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with severely calcified true bifurcation lesions, treated with RA followed by a single stent implantation, had more in-hospital adverse outcomes compared to those treated with two stents. However, the superior outcomes of the two-stent technique did not translate into improved long-term results. In fact, the two-stent technique was even associated with higher rates of revascularization after 1 year.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38832996
doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02461-y
pii: 10.1007/s00392-024-02461-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Lee MS, Yang T, Lasala J, Cox D (2016) Impact of coronary artery calcification in percutaneous coronary intervention with paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year clinical outcomes of paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients from the ARRIVE program. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions 88(6):891–897. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.26395
doi: 10.1002/ccd.26395
Latib A, Colombo A (2008) Bifurcation disease: what do we know, what should we do? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 1(3):218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2007.12.008
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2007.12.008
pubmed: 19463303
Lassen JF, Holm NR, Stankovic G, Lefevre T, Chieffo A, Hildick-Smith D et al (2014) Percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary bifurcation disease: consensus from the first 10 years of the European Bifurcation Club meetings. EuroIntervention 10(5):545–560. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV10I5A97
doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I5A97
pubmed: 25256198
Lassen JF, Burzotta F, Banning AP, Lefevre T, Darremont O, Hildick-Smith D et al (2018) Percutaneous coronary intervention for the left main stem and other bifurcation lesions: 12th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention 13(13):1540–1553. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00622
doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00622
pubmed: 29061550
Dudek D, Mehran R, Dziewierz A, Brener SJ, Rakowski T, Brzezinski M et al (2013) Impact of bifurcation target lesion on angiographic, electrocardiographic, and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (from the Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction [HORIZONS-AMI] trial). EuroIntervention 9(7):817–823. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV9I7A135
doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I7A135
pubmed: 24280158
De Luca L (2016) Percutaneous treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: is simplicity the ultimate sophistication? Circulation Cardiovascular interventions 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004328 .
Meier B, Gruentzig AR, King SB 3rd, Douglas JS Jr, Hollman J, Ischinger T et al (1984) Risk of side branch occlusion during coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 53(1):10–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(84)90675-1
doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90675-1
pubmed: 6229173
Kang SJ, Mintz GS, Kim WJ, Lee JY, Park DW, Lee SW et al (2011) Preintervention angiographic and intravascular ultrasound predictors for side branch compromise after a single-stent crossover technique. Am J Cardiol 107(12):1787–1793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.02.323
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.02.323
pubmed: 21507367
Vassilev D, Gil R (2008) Clinical verification of a theory for predicting side branch stenosis after main vessel stenting in coronary bifurcation lesions. J Interv Cardiol 21(6):493–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8183.2008.00400.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2008.00400.x
pubmed: 18973506
Lee SH, Lee JM, Song YB, Park TK, Yang JH, Hahn JY et al (2019) Prediction of side branch occlusions in percutaneous coronary interventions by coronary computed tomography: the CT bifurcation score as a novel tool for predicting intraprocedural side branch occlusion. EuroIntervention 15(9):e788–e795. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00113
doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00113
pubmed: 30636682
Kini AS, Vengrenyuk Y, Pena J, Yoshimura T, Panwar SR, Motoyama S et al (2017) Plaque morphology predictors of side branch occlusion after provisional stenting in coronary bifurcation lesion: results of optical coherence tomography bifurcation study (ORBID). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 89(2):259–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.26524
doi: 10.1002/ccd.26524
pubmed: 27029714
Kumsars I, Holm NR, Niemela M, Erglis A, Kervinen K, Christiansen EH et al (2020) Randomised comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV. Open heart 7(1):e000947. https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2018-000947
doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000947
pubmed: 32076558
pmcid: 6999681
Hildick-Smith D, Behan MW, Lassen JF, Chieffo A, Lefevre T, Stankovic G, et al (2016) The EBC TWO Study (European Bifurcation Coronary TWO): a randomized comparison of provisional T-stenting versus a systematic 2 stent culotte strategy in large caliber true bifurcations. Circulation Cardiovascular interventions. 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003643 .
Abdel-Wahab M, Toelg R, Byrne RA, Geist V, El-Mawardy M, Allali A et al (2018) High-speed rotational atherectomy versus modified balloons prior to drug-eluting stent implantation in severely calcified coronary lesions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 11(10):e007415. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007415
doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007415
pubmed: 30354632
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD et al (2012) Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 126(16):2020–2035. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31826e1058
doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31826e1058
pubmed: 22923432
Lunardi M, Louvard Y, Lefevre T, Stankovic G, Burzotta F, Kassab GS et al (2022) Definitions and standardized endpoints for treatment of coronary bifurcations. J Am Coll Cardiol 80(1):63–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.024
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.024
pubmed: 35597684
Louvard Y, Thomas M, Dzavik V, Hildick-Smith D, Galassi AR, Pan M et al (2008) Classification of coronary artery bifurcation lesions and treatments: time for a consensus! Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 71(2):175–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.21314
doi: 10.1002/ccd.21314
pubmed: 17985377
Ramcharitar S, Onuma Y, Aben JP, Consten C, Weijers B, Morel MA et al (2008) A novel dedicated quantitative coronary analysis methodology for bifurcation lesions. EuroIntervention 3(5):553–557. https://doi.org/10.4244/eijv3i5a100
doi: 10.4244/eijv3i5a100
pubmed: 19608480
Takebayashi H, Kobayashi Y, Mintz GS, Carlier SG, Fujii K, Yasuda T et al (2005) Intravascular ultrasound assessment of lesions with target vessel failure after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Am J Cardiol 95(4):498–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.10.020
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.10.020
pubmed: 15695138
Kobayashi Y, Okura H, Kume T, Yamada R, Kobayashi Y, Fukuhara K et al (2014) Impact of target lesion coronary calcification on stent expansion. Circ J 78(9):2209–2214. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.cj-14-0108
doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-14-0108
pubmed: 25017740
Allali A, Abdel-Wahab M, Traboulsi H, Hemetsberger R, Mankerious N, Byrne R et al (2020) Impact of lesion preparation technique on side branch compromise in calcified coronary bifurcations: a subgroup analysis of the PREPARE-CALC trial. J Interv Cardiol 2020:9740938. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9740938
doi: 10.1155/2020/9740938
pubmed: 33223974
pmcid: 7673940
Perfetti M, Fulgenzi F, Radico F, Toro A, Procopio A, Maddestra N et al (2019) Calcific lesion preparation for coronary bifurcation stenting. Cardiol J 26(5):429–437. https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2019.0094
doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2019.0094
pubmed: 31565792
pmcid: 8084380
Ito H, Piel S, Das P, Chhokar V, Khadim G, Nierzwicki R et al (2009) Long-term outcomes of plaque debulking with rotational atherectomy in side-branch ostial lesions to treat bifurcation coronary disease. J Invasive Cardiol 21(11):598–601
pubmed: 19901416
Chen YW, Su CS, Chang WC, Liu TJ, Liang KW, Lai CH et al (2018) Feasibility and clinical outcomes of rotational atherectomy for heavily-calcified side branches of complex coronary bifurcation lesions in the real-world practice of the drug-eluting stent era. J Interv Cardiol 31(4):486–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/joic.12515
doi: 10.1111/joic.12515
pubmed: 29667231
Mizuno Y, Sakakura K, Jinnouchi H, Taniguchi Y, Tsukui T, Watanabe Y et al (2022) Impact of rotational atherectomy on the incidence of side branch compromise in calcified bifurcation lesions undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. J Cardiol 80(6):518–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.07.004
doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.07.004
pubmed: 35882614
Farooq V, Serruys PW, Heo JH, Gogas BD, Okamura T, Gomez-Lara J et al (2011) New insights into the coronary artery bifurcation hypothesis-generating concepts utilizing 3-dimensional optical frequency domain imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4(8):921–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.06.004
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.06.004
pubmed: 21851908
Zhang JJ, Ye F, Xu K, Kan J, Tao L, Santoso T et al (2020) Multicentre, randomized comparison of two-stent and provisional stenting techniques in patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions: the DEFINITION II trial. Eur Heart J 41(27):2523–2536. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa543
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa543
pubmed: 32588060
Mankerious N, Hemetsberger R, Traboulsi H, Toelg R, Abdel-Wahab M, Richardt G et al (2020) Predictors of in-hospital adverse outcomes after rotational atherectomy: impact of the target vessel SYNTAX score. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 21(6):754–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2020.02.020
doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.02.020
pubmed: 32139281
Ford TJ, McCartney P, Corcoran D, Collison D, Hennigan B, McEntegart M, et al (2018) Single- versus 2-stent strategies for coronary bifurcation lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials with long-term follow-up. J Am Heart Assoc 7(11). https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008730 .
Chen SL, Santoso T, Zhang JJ, Ye F, Xu YW, Fu Q et al (2011) A randomized clinical study comparing double kissing crush with provisional stenting for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: results from the DKCRUSH-II (Double Kissing Crush versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 57(8):914–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.10.023
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.10.023
pubmed: 21329837
Burzotta F, Lassen JF, Lefevre T, Banning AP, Chatzizisis YS, Johnson TW et al (2021) Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation coronary lesions: the 15(th) consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention 16(16):1307–1317. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00169
doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00169
pubmed: 33074152
pmcid: 8919527
Chen SL, Santoso T, Zhang JJ, Ye F, Xu YW, Fu Q et al (2017) Clinical outcome of double kissing crush versus provisional stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the 5-year follow-up results from a randomized and multicenter DKCRUSH-II study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions). Circ Cardiovasc Interv 10(2):e004497. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004497
doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004497
pubmed: 28122805
pmcid: 5319391
Chen SL, Zhang JJ, Han Y, Kan J, Chen L, Qiu C et al (2017) Double kissing crush versus provisional stenting for left main distal bifurcation lesions: DKCRUSH-V randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 70(21):2605–2617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1066
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1066
pubmed: 29096915
Meng S, Kong X, Nan J, Yang X, Li J, Yang S et al (2023) Comparing the clinical outcomes of single vs. systematic dual stenting strategies for unprotected left main bifurcation lesion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med 10:1145412. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1145412
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1145412
pubmed: 37554363
pmcid: 10405628
Louvard Y, Medina A (2015) Definitions and classifications of bifurcation lesions and treatment. EuroIntervention. 11(Suppl V):23–6. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV11SVA5
doi: 10.4244/EIJV11SVA5
Lee JM, Choi KH, Song YB, Lee JY, Lee SJ, Lee SY et al (2023) Intravascular imaging-guided or angiography-guided complex PCI. N Engl J Med 388(18):1668–1679. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2216607
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2216607
pubmed: 36876735
Holm NR, Andreasen LN, Neghabat O, Laanmets P, Kumsars I, Bennett J et al (2023) OCT or angiography guidance for PCI in complex bifurcation lesions. N Engl J Med 389(16):1477–1487. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2307770
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307770
pubmed: 37634149