Clinical characteristic and survival outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC according to KRAS mutational status in the French real-life ESME cohort.

KRAS mutational status NSCLC immunotherapy prognosis real life data

Journal

ESMO open
ISSN: 2059-7029
Titre abrégé: ESMO Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101690685

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 10 02 2024
revised: 22 03 2024
accepted: 21 04 2024
medline: 5 6 2024
pubmed: 5 6 2024
entrez: 4 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The RAS/MEK signaling pathway is essential in carcinogenesis and frequently altered in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), notably by KRAS mutations (KRASm) that affect 25%-30% of non-squamous NSCLC. This study aims to explore the impact of KRASm subtypes on disease phenotype and survival outcomes. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics database for advanced or metastatic lung cancer from 2011 to 2021. Patient demographics, histology, KRASm status, treatment strategies, and outcomes were assessed. Of 10 177 assessable patients for KRAS status, 17.6% had KRAS p.G12C mutation, 22.6% had KRAS non-p.G12C mutation, and 59.8% were KRASwt. KRASm patients were more often smokers (96.3%) compared with KRASwt (85.8%). A higher proportion of programmed death-ligand 1 ≥50% was found for KRASm patients: 43.5% versus 38.0% (P < 0.01). KRASm correlated with poorer outcomes. First-line median progression-free survival was shorter in the KRASm than the KRASwt cohort: 4.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7-4.3 months] versus 5.1 months (95% CI 4.8-5.3 months), P < 0.001. First-line overall survival was shorter for KRASm than KRASwt patients: 12.6 months (95% CI 11.6-13.6 months) versus 15.4 months (95% CI 14.6-16.2 months), P = 0.012. First-line chemoimmunotherapy offered better overall survival in KRAS p.G12C (48.8 months) compared with KRAS non-p.G12C (24.0 months) and KRASwt (22.5 months) patients. Second-line overall survival with immunotherapy was superior in the KRAS p.G12C subgroup: 12.6 months (95% CI 8.1-18.6 months) compared with 9.4 months (95% CI 8.0-11.4 months) for KRAS non-p.G12C and 9.6 months (8.4-11.0 months) for KRASwt patients. We highlighted distinct clinical profiles and survival outcomes according to KRASm subtypes. Notably KRAS p.G12C mutations may provide increased sensitivity to immunotherapy, suggesting potential therapeutic implications for sequencing or combination of therapies. Further research on the impact of emerging KRAS specific inhibitors are warranted in real-world cohorts.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38833966
pii: S2059-7029(24)01242-0
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103473
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103473

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosure QDT received honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, and Sanofi and meeting/travel support from Amgen and Sanofi. CC received grants or contracts, consulting fees, personal/institutional honoraria, and meeting/travel support from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda. TF received personal/institutional honoraria from Janssen, Lilly, and Roche. JRM received grants or contracts from MSD, received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker’s bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, Edimark, Janssen, MSD, Sanofi, Roche, and Takeda and meeting/travel support from Ose-Immunotherapeutics. MP received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Novocure, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureau, manuscript writing or educational events from Anheart Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Takeda; payment for expert testimony from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Roche; support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda; and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Pharmamar and Roche. CAV received consulting fees or meeting/travel support from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, and Takeda; and participated in an advisory board for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi. GJ received meeting/travel support from Sanofi. SH received personal/institutional honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda; and meeting/travel support from Novartis and Sanofi. AS received consulting fees from Exafield and Guidepoint; honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, and MSD; meeting/travel support from Amgen and Roche; and is a board member of the SFFPO. EP received personal/institutional honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, and MSD; meeting/travel support from Takeda and Amgen; and participated in an advisory board for Takeda. NG declared research grants/support from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Gilead, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Merk Serono, MSD, Novartis, Sanofi, Sivan; consultative services for AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Gilead, Ipsen Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Lilly, MSD, Mirati, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Takeda; participation on a data safety monitoring board for Hoffmann-La Roche; and employment of a family member with AstraZeneca. PDR received meeting/travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Summit Therapeutics, Sanofi, and Takeda; and participated in an advisory board for Sanofi and Takeda. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Q D Thomas (QD)

Department of Medical Oncology, Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier; Oncogenic Pathways in Lung Cancer, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute, University of Montpellier, Montpellier.

X Quantin (X)

Department of Medical Oncology, Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier; Oncogenic Pathways in Lung Cancer, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute, University of Montpellier, Montpellier.

P Lemercier (P)

Biometrics Unit, Montpellier Cancer Institute, University of Montpellier, Montpellier.

C Chouaid (C)

Department of Pneumology, Intercommunal Hospital Créteil, Créteil.

S Schneider (S)

Department of Pneumology, Hospital Center Côte Basque, Bayonne.

T Filleron (T)

Biostatistics Unit, Claudius Regaud Institute IUCT-O, Toulouse.

J Remon-Masip (J)

Thoracic Unit, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.

M Perol (M)

Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon.

D Debieuvre (D)

Department of Pneumology, GHR Mulhouse Sud-Alsace, Mulhouse.

C Audigier-Valette (C)

Department of Pneumology, Intercommunal Hospital, Toulon.

G Justeau (G)

Department of Pneumology, University Hospital, Angers.

A Loeb (A)

Department of Medical Information, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen.

S Hiret (S)

Department of Medical Oncology, West Cancer Institute, Angers & Nantes.

C Clement-Duchene (C)

Department of Pneumology, Lorraine Cancer Institute, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy.

E Dansin (E)

Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille.

A Stancu (A)

Department of Medical Oncology, Sainte Catherine Institute, Avignon.

E Pichon (E)

Department of Pneumology, University Hospital, Tours.

L Bosquet (L)

Department of Health Data and Partnerships, Unicancer, Paris.

N Girard (N)

Institut Curie, Institut du Thorax Curie-Montsouris, Paris & St Cloud, France.

P Du Rusquec (P)

Institut Curie, Institut du Thorax Curie-Montsouris, Paris & St Cloud, France. Electronic address: pauline.durusquec@curie.fr.

Classifications MeSH