Outcome improvement with chemotherapy and radiotherapy in primary, localized, radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast region: a retrospective case series analysis.
(neo)adjuvant chemotherapy
angiosarcoma
localized disease
multimodal treatment
radiation-associated sarcoma
radiotherapy
Journal
ESMO open
ISSN: 2059-7029
Titre abrégé: ESMO Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101690685
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Jun 2024
03 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
30
01
2024
revised:
31
03
2024
accepted:
02
04
2024
medline:
5
6
2024
pubmed:
5
6
2024
entrez:
4
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
We report on a series of consecutive patients with localized radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) of the breast region (BR) treated at two Italian sarcoma reference centers. We retrospectively reviewed all cases of primary, localized, resectable RAAS of the BR, treated at one of the two participating institutions from 2000 to 2019. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. The prognostic role of several variables was investigated. A propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was carried out. Eighty-four patients were retrospectively identified. Nineteen out of 84 patients (22.6%) were pretreated with an anthracycline-based regimen for previous cancer. All patients but one underwent surgery, with 37/84 (44.1%) receiving surgery alone and 46/84 (54.8%) a multimodal approach: 18/84 (21.4%) received radiation therapy (RT) and 46/84 (54.9%) received chemotherapy. An anthracycline-based regimen was used in 10/84 patients (11.9%), while a gemcitabine-based regimen was used in 33/84 (39.3%). With a median follow-up of 51 months (interquartile range: 30-126 months), 36/84 patients (42.9%) relapsed and 35/84 patients (41.7%) died (8/84, 9.5% in the lack of metastatic disease). Five-year OS and 5-year RFS were 57% [95% confidence interval (CI) 43% to 68%] and 52% (95% CI 39% to 63%), respectively. Both (neo)adjuvant RT and chemotherapy were associated with better RFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.25, 95% CI 0.08-0.83; HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.23-0.89] with a trend towards a better OS (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.18-1.46; HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.29-1.24). Gemcitabine-based regimens seemed to perform better (HR 4.28, 95% CI 1.29-14.14). PSM analysis retained the above results. This retrospective study supports the use of (neo)adjuvant RT and chemotherapy, in primary, localized resectable RAAS of the BR. An effort to prospectively validate the role of (neo)adjuvant RT and chemotherapy is warranted.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
We report on a series of consecutive patients with localized radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) of the breast region (BR) treated at two Italian sarcoma reference centers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed all cases of primary, localized, resectable RAAS of the BR, treated at one of the two participating institutions from 2000 to 2019. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. The prognostic role of several variables was investigated. A propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was carried out.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Eighty-four patients were retrospectively identified. Nineteen out of 84 patients (22.6%) were pretreated with an anthracycline-based regimen for previous cancer. All patients but one underwent surgery, with 37/84 (44.1%) receiving surgery alone and 46/84 (54.8%) a multimodal approach: 18/84 (21.4%) received radiation therapy (RT) and 46/84 (54.9%) received chemotherapy. An anthracycline-based regimen was used in 10/84 patients (11.9%), while a gemcitabine-based regimen was used in 33/84 (39.3%). With a median follow-up of 51 months (interquartile range: 30-126 months), 36/84 patients (42.9%) relapsed and 35/84 patients (41.7%) died (8/84, 9.5% in the lack of metastatic disease). Five-year OS and 5-year RFS were 57% [95% confidence interval (CI) 43% to 68%] and 52% (95% CI 39% to 63%), respectively. Both (neo)adjuvant RT and chemotherapy were associated with better RFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.25, 95% CI 0.08-0.83; HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.23-0.89] with a trend towards a better OS (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.18-1.46; HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.29-1.24). Gemcitabine-based regimens seemed to perform better (HR 4.28, 95% CI 1.29-14.14). PSM analysis retained the above results.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This retrospective study supports the use of (neo)adjuvant RT and chemotherapy, in primary, localized resectable RAAS of the BR. An effort to prospectively validate the role of (neo)adjuvant RT and chemotherapy is warranted.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38833974
pii: S2059-7029(24)01243-2
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103474
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
103474Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure EP—outside the submitted work: institutional financial interests: Advenchen Laboratories, Amgen Dompe', Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Daiichi Sankyo, Deciphera, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Epizyme Inc, Glaxo Smith Kline, Karyopharm Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar. GGB—outside the submitted work: consulting fees from Eli Lilly, PharmaMar, AboutEvents; honoraria from PharmaMar, Eli Lilly, Glaxo Smith Kline, Merck Sharp & Dome, Eisai, Istituto Gentili; support for attending meetings and/or travels from Novartis, PharmaMar, Eli Lilly; participation on advisory board from PharmaMar, Eli Lilly, Glaxo Smith Kline, Merck Sharp & Dome, Eisai. AMF—outside the submitted work: institutional financial interests: Advenchen Laboratories, Amgen Dompe’, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Daiichi Sankyo, Deciphera, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Epizyme Inc, Glaxo Smith Kline, Karyopharm Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar. IP—outside the submitted work: institutional financial interests: Advenchen Laboratories, Amgen Dompe', Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Daiichi Sankyo, Deciphera, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Epizyme Inc, Glaxo Smith Kline, Karyopharm Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar. PGC—outside the submitted work: institutional financial interests: Advenchen Laboratories, Amgen Dompe', Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Daiichi Sankyo, Deciphera, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Epizyme Inc, Glaxo Smith Kline, Karyopharm Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar. TDP—outside the submitted work: participation on advisory board from Glaxo Smith Kline, Boehringer Ingelheim. Trial support from: Pfizer, BluPrint Medicine, Gilead, Amgen, Merck. SS—outside the submitted work: personal financial interests (honoraria, consultancy or advisory role): Aadi, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Bavarian Nordic, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Deciphera, Epizyme, Gentili, GSK, Agenus, Ikena, MaxiVAX, Novartis, PharmaMar, Pharma Essentia, Rain Therapeutics, Servier; support for attending meetings and/or travel PharmaMar; institutional financial interests: Advenchen, Bayer, Blueprint, Daiichi Sankyo, Deciphera, Epizyme, Eli Lilly, GSK, Hutchinson, Inhibrx, Karyopharm, Novartis, PharmaMar, Rain Therapeutics, SpringWorks; unpaid Member of the Scientific Advisory Board of the Chordoma Foundation, Member of the Scientific Advisory Board of the Desmoid Foundation, Member of the Scientific Advisory Board of the Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma Group, Member of the Scientific Advisory Board of the Leiomyosarcoma Foundation. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.