Absolute Lymphocyte Count and Outcomes of Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Idecabtagene Vicleucel: The U.S. Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium Real World Experience.

Idecabtagene vicleucel absolute lymphocyte count multiple myeloma relapsed-refractory

Journal

Transplantation and cellular therapy
ISSN: 2666-6367
Titre abrégé: Transplant Cell Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101774629

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 25 01 2024
revised: 14 04 2024
accepted: 29 05 2024
medline: 5 6 2024
pubmed: 5 6 2024
entrez: 4 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) has shown impressive efficacy in relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) on the survival outcomes of RRMM patients treated with standard of care (SOC) ide-cel. Data were retrospectively collected from 11 institutions in the U.S. Impact of ALC parameters including pre-apheresis (pre-A), pre-lymphodepletion (pre-LD), absolute and percent difference from pre-A to pre-LD on clinical outcomes after ide-cel were examined using survival analysis. A new ALC profile was created based on univariate analysis and included three groups: Normal (≥1 × 10 214 SOC ide-cel recipients were included in this analysis, median age (IQR) was 64 (57-69) years, median number of prior therapies was 6 (5-9), and median (IQR) follow up time was 5.4 (2.1-8.3) months. Most patients had both low pre-A (75.3%) and pre-LD (77.2%) ALC, and the reduction from pre-A to pre-LD (median 0.65 to 0.55 × 10 Our findings indicate that low pre-LD ALC with high percent reduction from pre-A to pre-LD was associated with inferior survival outcomes, particularly OS, in patients who received SOC ide-cel.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) has shown impressive efficacy in relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) on the survival outcomes of RRMM patients treated with standard of care (SOC) ide-cel.
METHODS METHODS
Data were retrospectively collected from 11 institutions in the U.S. Impact of ALC parameters including pre-apheresis (pre-A), pre-lymphodepletion (pre-LD), absolute and percent difference from pre-A to pre-LD on clinical outcomes after ide-cel were examined using survival analysis. A new ALC profile was created based on univariate analysis and included three groups: Normal (≥1 × 10
RESULTS RESULTS
214 SOC ide-cel recipients were included in this analysis, median age (IQR) was 64 (57-69) years, median number of prior therapies was 6 (5-9), and median (IQR) follow up time was 5.4 (2.1-8.3) months. Most patients had both low pre-A (75.3%) and pre-LD (77.2%) ALC, and the reduction from pre-A to pre-LD (median 0.65 to 0.55 × 10
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Our findings indicate that low pre-LD ALC with high percent reduction from pre-A to pre-LD was associated with inferior survival outcomes, particularly OS, in patients who received SOC ide-cel.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38834151
pii: S2666-6367(24)00437-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.05.025
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Jack Khouri (J)

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center.

Danai Dima (D)

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center. Electronic address: dimad@ccf.org.

Hong Li (H)

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center.

Doris Hansen (D)

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute.

Surbhi Sidana (S)

Stanford University School of Medicine.

Leyla Shune (L)

The University of Kansas Medical Center.

Faiz Anwer (F)

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center.

Douglas Sborov (D)

The University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute.

Charlotte Wagner (C)

The University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute.

Mehmet H Kocoglu (MH)

University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Shebli Atrash (S)

Levine Cancer Institute.

Peter Voorhees (P)

Levine Cancer Institute.

Lauren Peres (L)

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute.

Vanna Hovanky (V)

Stanford University School of Medicine.

Gary Simmons (G)

Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center.

Louis Williams (L)

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center.

Shahzad Raza (S)

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center.

Aimaz Afrough (A)

UT Southwestern Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Larry Anderson (L)

UT Southwestern Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Christopher Fererri (C)

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Hamza Hashmi (H)

Medical University of South Carolina.

James Davis (J)

Medical University of South Carolina.

Joseph McGuirk (J)

The University of Kansas Medical Center.

Scott Goldsmith (S)

City of Hope Cancer Center.

Azra Borogovac (A)

City of Hope Cancer Center.

Yi Lin (Y)

Mayo Clinic Cancer Center.

Shonali Midha (S)

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.

Omar Nadeem (O)

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.

Frederick L Locke (FL)

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute.

Rachid Baz (R)

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute.

Betty Hamilton (B)

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center.

Melissa Alsina (M)

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute.

Craig Sauter (C)

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center.

Krina Patel (K)

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Gurbakhash Kaur (G)

UT Southwestern Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Classifications MeSH