An optimised patient-derived explant platform for breast cancer reflects clinical responses to chemotherapy and antibody-directed therapy.
Humans
Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Female
Tumor Microenvironment
/ drug effects
Trastuzumab
/ therapeutic use
Receptor, ErbB-2
/ metabolism
Cell Proliferation
/ drug effects
Antineoplastic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Middle Aged
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ metabolism
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ therapeutic use
Breast cancer
HER2
Multi-immunofluorescence
Patient-derived explants
Therapies
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 06 2024
04 06 2024
Historique:
received:
15
05
2023
accepted:
27
05
2024
medline:
5
6
2024
pubmed:
5
6
2024
entrez:
4
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Breast Cancer is the most common cancer among women globally. Despite significant improvements in overall survival, many tumours are refractory to therapy and so novel approaches are required to improve patient outcomes. We have evaluated patient-derived explants (PDEs) as a novel preclinical platform for breast cancer (BC) and implemented cutting-edge digital pathology and multi-immunofluorescent approaches for investigating biomarker changes in both tumour and stromal areas at endpoint. Short-term culture of intact fragments of BCs as PDEs retained an intact immune microenvironment, and tumour architecture was augmented by the inclusion of autologous serum in the culture media. Cell death/proliferation responses to FET chemotherapy in BC-PDEs correlated significantly with BC patient progression-free survival (p = 0.012 and p = 0.0041, respectively) and cell death responses to the HER2 antibody therapy trastuzumab correlated significantly with HER2 status (p = 0.018). These studies show that the PDE platform combined with digital pathology is a robust preclinical approach for informing clinical responses to chemotherapy and antibody-directed therapies in breast cancer. Furthermore, since BC-PDEs retain an intact tumour architecture over the short-term, they facilitate the preclinical testing of anti-cancer agents targeting the tumour microenvironment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38834809
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63170-0
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-63170-0
doi:
Substances chimiques
Trastuzumab
P188ANX8CK
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
ERBB2 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
12833Subventions
Organisme : Breast Cancer Now
ID : 2017NOVPCC1066
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Breast Cancer Now
ID : 2017NOVPCC1066
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Breast Cancer Now
ID : 2017NOVPCC1066
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Breast Cancer Now
ID : 2017NOVPCC1066
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Breast Cancer Now
ID : 2017NOVPCC1066
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Breast Cancer Now
ID : 2017NOVPCC1066
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Breast Cancer Now
ID : 2017NOVPCC1066
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Breast Cancer Now
ID : 2017NOVPCC1066
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Breast Cancer Now
ID : 2017NOVPCC1066
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C10604/A25151
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C10604/A25151
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C10604/A25151
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C10604/A25151
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C10604/A25151
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C10604/A25151
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Bray, F. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 68, 394–424 (2018).
pubmed: 30207593
doi: 10.3322/caac.21492
Allemani, C. et al. Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995–2009: analysis of individual data for 25 676 887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2). Lancet 385, 977–1010 (2015).
pubmed: 25467588
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62038-9
den Hollander, P., Savage, M. I. & Brown, P. H. Targeted therapy for breast cancer prevention. Front. Oncol. 3, 250 (2013).
Masoud, V. & Pagès, G. Targeted therapies in breast cancer: New challenges to fight against resistance. World J. Clin. Oncol. 8, 120–134 (2017).
pubmed: 28439493
pmcid: 5385433
doi: 10.5306/wjco.v8.i2.120
Pegram, M. D. et al. Phase II study of receptor-enhanced chemosensitivity using recombinant humanized anti-p185HER2/neu monoclonal antibody plus cisplatin in patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer refractory to chemotherapy treatment. J. Clin. Oncol. 16, 2659–2671 (1998).
pubmed: 9704716
doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.8.2659
Slamon, D. J. et al. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N. Engl. J. Med. 344, 783–792 (2001).
pubmed: 11248153
doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103153441101
Miller, K. et al. Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 2666–2676 (2007).
pubmed: 18160686
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa072113
Bayraktar, S., Batoo, S., Okuno, S. & Glück, S. Immunotherapy in breast cancer. J. Carcinog. 18, 2 (2019).
pubmed: 31160888
pmcid: 6540776
doi: 10.4103/jcar.JCar_2_19
de Bono, J. S. & Ashworth, A. Translating cancer research into targeted therapeutics. Nature 467, 543–549 (2010).
pubmed: 20882008
doi: 10.1038/nature09339
Hidalgo, M. et al. A pilot clinical study of treatment guided by personalized tumorgrafts in patients with advanced cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 10, 1311–1316 (2011).
pubmed: 21673092
pmcid: 4629061
doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0233
Izumchenko, E. et al. Patient-derived xenografts effectively capture responses to oncology therapy in a heterogeneous cohort of patients with solid tumors. Ann. Oncol. 28, 2595–2605 (2017).
pubmed: 28945830
pmcid: 5834154
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx416
Verduin, M., Hoeben, A., De Ruysscher, D. & Vooijs, M. Patient-Derived Cancer Organoids as Predictors of Treatment Response. Front Oncol 11, 641980 (2021).
pubmed: 33816288
pmcid: 8012903
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.641980
Sasmita, A. O. & Wong, Y. P. Organoids as reliable breast cancer study models: An update. Int. J. Oncol. Res. 1 (2018).
LeSavage, B. L., Suhar, R. A., Broguiere, N., Lutolf, M. P. & Heilshorn, S. C. Next-generation cancer organoids. Nat. Mater. 21, 143–159 (2022).
pubmed: 34385685
doi: 10.1038/s41563-021-01057-5
Cameron, G. & Chambers, R. Neoplasm studies: III. Organization of cells of human tumors in tissue culture. Am. J. Cancer 30, 115–129 (1937).
doi: 10.1158/ajc.1937.115
Sherwin, R. P. & Richters, A. The documentation of human breast cancer in tissue culture. Cancer 34, 1943–1955 (1974).
pubmed: 4140019
doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197412)34:6<1943::AID-CNCR2820340613>3.0.CO;2-T
Antoszczak, M. et al. Biological activity of doubly modified salinomycin analogs–evaluation in vitro and ex vivo. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 156, 510–523 (2018).
pubmed: 30025346
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.07.021
Urbaniak, A. et al. The response of phyllodes tumor of the breast to anticancer therapy: An in vitro and ex vivo study. Oncol. Lett. 18, 5097–5106 (2019).
pubmed: 31612021
pmcid: 6781661
Carranza-Torres, I. E. et al. Organotypic culture of breast tumor explants as a multicellular system for the screening of natural compounds with antineoplastic potential. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 618021 (2015).
pubmed: 26075250
pmcid: 4449881
doi: 10.1155/2015/618021
Karekla, E. et al. Ex vivo explant cultures of non-small cell lung carcinoma enable evaluation of primary tumor responses to anticancer therapy. Cancer Res. 77, 2029–2039 (2017).
pubmed: 28202521
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1121
Collins, A. et al. Development of a patient-derived explant model for prediction of drug responses in endometrial cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 160, 557 (2020).
pubmed: 33309417
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.11.033
Majumder, B. et al. Predicting clinical response to anticancer drugs using an ex vivo platform that captures tumour heterogeneity. Nat. Commun. 6, 6169 (2015).
pubmed: 25721094
doi: 10.1038/ncomms7169
Viticchié, G. et al. Patient-derived tumor explants as a "live" preclinical platform for predicting drug resistance in patients. J. Vis. Exp. (2021).
Fischer, A. H., Jacobson, K. A., Rose, J. & Zeller, R. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of tissue and cell sections. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2008, pdb.prot4986 (2008).
doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot4986
Miles, G. J. et al. Evaluating and comparing immunostaining and computational methods for spatial profiling of drug response in patient-derived explants. Lab. Investig. 101, 396 (2020).
pubmed: 33318618
doi: 10.1038/s41374-020-00511-3
Wickham, H. et al. Welcome to the Tidyverse. J. Open Sour. Softw. 4, 1686 (2019).
doi: 10.21105/joss.01686
Robin, X. et al. pROC: An open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinf. 12, 77 (2011).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-77
Makki, J. Diversity of breast carcinoma: histological subtypes and clinical relevance. Clin. Med. Insights Pathol. 8, 23–31 (2015).
pubmed: 26740749
pmcid: 4689326
doi: 10.4137/CPath.S31563
McPhail, S., Johnson, S., Greenberg, D., Peake, M. & Rous, B. Stage at diagnosis and early mortality from cancer in England. Br. J. Cancer 112(Suppl 1), 108 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.49
Blanks, R. G., Wallis, M. G., Alison, R. J. & Given-Wilson, R. M. An analysis of screen-detected invasive cancers by grade in the English breast cancer screening programme: Are we failing to detect sufficient small grade 3 cancers?. Eur. Radiol. 31, 2548 (2020).
pubmed: 32997179
pmcid: 7979656
doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07276-9
Soliman, N. A. & Yussif, S. M. Ki-67 as a prognostic marker according to breast cancer molecular subtype. Cancer Biol. Med. 13, 496–504 (2016).
pubmed: 28154782
pmcid: 5250608
doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2016.0066
Lipponen, P., Aaltomaa, S., Kosma, V. M. & Syrjänen, K. Apoptosis in breast cancer as related to histopathological characteristics and prognosis. Eur. J. Cancer 30A, 2068–2073 (1994).
pubmed: 7857705
doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(94)00342-3
Hashmi, A. A. et al. Ki67 index in intrinsic breast cancer subtypes and its association with prognostic parameters. BMC Res. Notes 12, 605 (2019).
pubmed: 31547858
pmcid: 6755684
doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4653-x
de Jong, J. S., van Diest, P. J. & Baak, J. P. Number of apoptotic cells as a prognostic marker in invasive breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer 82, 368–373 (2000).
pubmed: 10646890
pmcid: 2363300
doi: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.0928
Yersal, O. & Barutca, S. Biological subtypes of breast cancer: Prognostic and therapeutic implications. World J. Clin. Oncol. 5, 412–424 (2014).
pubmed: 25114856
pmcid: 4127612
doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.412
Centenera, M. M. et al. A patient-derived explant (PDE) model of hormone-dependent cancer. Mol. Oncol. 12, 1608–1622 (2018).
pubmed: 30117261
pmcid: 6120230
doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12354
Wilby, A. J. et al. A novel preclinical model of the normal human breast. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 29, 9 (2024).
pubmed: 38695983
pmcid: 11065935
doi: 10.1007/s10911-024-09562-4
Anderson, L. W. et al. Cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide/aldophosphamide kinetics in patients receiving high-dose cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2, 1481–1487 (1996).
pubmed: 9816324
Leyland-Jones, B. et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of trastuzumab administered every three weeks in combination with paclitaxel. JCO 21, 3965–3971 (2003).
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.12.109
Kenmotsu, H. & Tanigawara, Y. Pharmacokinetics, dynamics and toxicity of docetaxel: Why the Japanese dose differs from the Western dose. Cancer Sci. 106, 497–504 (2015).
pubmed: 25728850
pmcid: 4452149
doi: 10.1111/cas.12647
Hunz, M. et al. Plasma and tissue pharmacokinetics of epirubicin and paclitaxel in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced primary breast cancer. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 81, 659–668 (2007).
pubmed: 17301739
doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100067
Takimoto, C. H. et al. High inter- and intrapatient variation in 5-fluorouracil plasma concentrations during a prolonged drug infusion. Clin. Cancer Res. 5, 1347–1352 (1999).
pubmed: 10389918
Vasudevan, D., Jayalakshmy, P. S., Kumar, S. & Mathew, S. Assessment of pathological response of breast carcinoma in modified radical mastectomy specimens after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Int. J. Breast Cancer 2015, 536145 (2015).
pubmed: 26697228
pmcid: 4677209
doi: 10.1155/2015/536145
Lips, E. H. et al. Breast cancer subtyping by immunohistochemistry and histological grade outperforms breast cancer intrinsic subtypes in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 140, 63–71 (2013).
pubmed: 23828499
pmcid: 3706735
doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2620-0
Goorts, B. et al. Clinical tumor stage is the most important predictor of pathological complete response rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 163, 83–91 (2017).
pubmed: 28205044
pmcid: 5387027
doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4155-2
Didonato, R. et al. Invasive mucinous carcinoma of the breast and response patterns after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Histopathology 72, 965–973 (2018).
pubmed: 29220097
doi: 10.1111/his.13451
Morse, D. L., Gray, H., Payne, C. M. & Gillies, R. J. Docetaxel induces cell death through mitotic catastrophe in human breast cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 4, 1495–1504 (2005).
pubmed: 16227398
doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0130
Plosker, G. L. & Faulds, D. Epirubicin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cancer chemotherapy. Drugs 45, 788–856 (1993).
pubmed: 7686469
doi: 10.2165/00003495-199345050-00011
Miller, I. et al. Ki67 is a graded rather than a binary marker of proliferation versus Quiescence. Cell. Rep. 24, 1105-1112.e5 (2018).
pubmed: 30067968
pmcid: 6108547
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.110
Powley, I. R. et al. Patient-derived explants (PDEs) as a powerful preclinical platform for anti-cancer drug and biomarker discovery. Br. J. Cancer 122, 735–744 (2020).
pubmed: 31894140
pmcid: 7078311
doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0672-6
van der Kuip, H. et al. Short term culture of breast cancer tissues to study the activity of the anticancer drug taxol in an intact tumor environment. BMC Cancer 6, 86 (2006).
pubmed: 16603054
pmcid: 1456977
doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-86
Maadi, H., Soheilifar, M. H., Choi, W., Moshtaghian, A. & Wang, Z. Trastuzumab mechanism of action; 20 years of research to unravel a dilemma. Cancers (Basel) 13, 3540. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13143540 (2021).
doi: 10.3390/cancers13143540
pubmed: 34298754
Lai, Y. et al. Current status and perspectives of patient-derived xenograft models in cancer research. J. Hematol. Oncol. 10, 106 (2017).
pubmed: 28499452
pmcid: 5427553
doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0470-7
Vlachogiannis, G. et al. Patient-derived organoids model treatment response of metastatic gastrointestinal cancers. Science 359, 920–926 (2018).
pubmed: 29472484
pmcid: 6112415
doi: 10.1126/science.aao2774
Shinden, Y. et al. Clinical significance of the histoculture drug response assay in breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 36, 6173–6178 (2016).
pubmed: 27793948
doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11210
Tanino, H. et al. Acquisition of multidrug resistance in recurrent breast cancer demonstrated by the histoculture drug response assay. Anticancer Res. 21, 4083–4086 (2001).
pubmed: 11911296
Dumitru, A. et al. Mucinous breast cancer: A review study of 5 year experience from a hospital-based series of cases. Maedica (Bucur) 10, 14–18 (2015).
pubmed: 26225144
Piccart-Gebhart, M. J. et al. Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 1659–1672 (2005).
pubmed: 16236737
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052306
Romond, E. H. et al. Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 1673–1684 (2005).
pubmed: 16236738
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052122