Understanding the processes underpinning IMPlementing IMProved Asthma self-management as RouTine (IMP
Asthma
IMP2ART
Implementation
Primary care
Process evaluation
Self-management
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Jun 2024
04 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
11
02
2024
accepted:
16
05
2024
medline:
5
6
2024
pubmed:
5
6
2024
entrez:
4
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Providing supported self-management for people with asthma can reduce the burden on patients, health services and wider society. Implementation, however, remains poor in routine clinical practice. IMPlementing IMProved Asthma self-management as RouTine (IMP A mixed-methods process evaluation nested within the IMP This mixed-methods, theoretically informed, process evaluation seeks to provide insights into the delivery and response to a whole-systems approach to the implementation of supported self-management in asthma care in primary care. It is underway at a time of significant change in primary care in the UK. The methods have, therefore, been developed to be adaptable to this changing context and to capture the impact of these changes on the delivery and response to research and implementation processes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Providing supported self-management for people with asthma can reduce the burden on patients, health services and wider society. Implementation, however, remains poor in routine clinical practice. IMPlementing IMProved Asthma self-management as RouTine (IMP
METHODS
METHODS
A mixed-methods process evaluation nested within the IMP
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
This mixed-methods, theoretically informed, process evaluation seeks to provide insights into the delivery and response to a whole-systems approach to the implementation of supported self-management in asthma care in primary care. It is underway at a time of significant change in primary care in the UK. The methods have, therefore, been developed to be adaptable to this changing context and to capture the impact of these changes on the delivery and response to research and implementation processes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38835102
doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08179-6
pii: 10.1186/s13063-024-08179-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Clinical Trial Protocol
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
359Subventions
Organisme : Programme Grants for Applied Research
ID : RP-PG-1016-20008
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Pinnock H, Parke HL, Panagioti M, Daines L, Pearce G, Epiphaniou E, Bower P, Sheikh A, Griffiths CJ, Taylor SJC, et al. Systematic meta-review of supported self-management for asthma: a healthcare perspective. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0823-7 .
doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0823-7
pubmed: 28302126
pmcid: 5356253
Wiener-Ogilvie S, Pinnock H, Huby G, Sheikh A, Partridge MR, Gillies J. Do practices comply with key recommendations of the British Asthma Guideline? If not, why not? Prim Care Respir J. 2007;16(6):369–77. https://doi.org/10.3132/pcrj.2007.00074 .
doi: 10.3132/pcrj.2007.00074
pubmed: 18026674
pmcid: 6634244
Taylor SJC, Pinnock H, Epiphaniou E, Pearce G, Parke H. A rapid synthesis of the evidence on interventions supporting self-management for people with long-term conditions. (PRISMS Practical Systematic Review of Self-Management Support for long-term conditions) Health Serv Deliv Res. 2014;2:54.
McClatchey K, Sheldon A, Steed L, Sheringham J, Holmes S, Preston M, Appiagyei F, Price D, Taylor SJC, Pinnock H, et al. Development of theoretically informed audit and feedback: an exemplar from a complex implementation strategy to improve asthma self-management in UK primary care. J Eval Clin Pract. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13895 .
doi: 10.1111/jep.13895
pubmed: 37438918
McClatchey K, Marsh V, Steed L, Holmes S, Taylor SJC, Wiener-Ogilvie S, Neal J, Last R, Saxon A, Pinnock H, et al. Developing a theoretically informed education programme within the context of a complex implementation strategy in UK primary care: an exemplar from the IMP2ART trial. Trials. 2022;23(1):350. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06147-6 .
doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06147-6
pubmed: 35461269
pmcid: 9034072
McClatchey K, Sheldon A, Steed L, Sheringham J, Appiagyei F, Price D, Hammersley V, Taylor S, Pinnock H. Development of a patient-centred electronic review template to support self-management in primary care: a mixed-methods study. BJGP Open 2023, 7 (2), BJGPO.2022.0165. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpo.2022.0165 .
Morrissey M, Shepherd E, Kinley E, McClatchey K, Pinnock H. Effectiveness and perceptions of using templates in long-term condition reviews: a systematic synthesis of quantitative and qualitative studies. Br J Gen Pract. 2021;71(710):e652–9. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp.2020.0963 .
doi: 10.3399/bjgp.2020.0963
pubmed: 33690148
pmcid: 8321439
Harvey G, Kitson A. PARIHS revisited: from heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice. Implement Sci. 2016;11:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0398-2 .
doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0398-2
pubmed: 27013464
pmcid: 4807546
Kislov R, Pope C, Martin GP, Wilson PM. Harnessing the power of theorising in implementation science. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0957-4 .
doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0957-4
pubmed: 31823787
pmcid: 6905028
Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 .
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
pubmed: 21513547
pmcid: 3096582
Steed L, Sheringham J, McClatchey K, Hammersley V, Marsh V, Morgan N, Jackson T, Holmes S, Taylor S, Pinnock H. IMP(2)ART: development of a multi-level programme theory integrating the COM-B model and the iPARIHS framework, to enhance implementation of supported self-management of asthma in primary care. Implement Sci Commun. 2023;4(1):136. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-023-00515-2 .
doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00515-2
pubmed: 37957778
pmcid: 10644643
McClatchey K, Sheringham J, Barat A, Delaney B, Searle B, Marsh V, Hammersley V, Taylor S, Pinnock H. IMPlementing IMProved Asthma self-management as RouTine (IMP2ART) in primary care: internal pilot for a cluster randomised controlled trial. Eur Respir J. 2022;60(suppl 66):394. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2022.394 .
doi: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2022.394
Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, Moore L, O’Cathain A, Tinati T, Wight D, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2015, 350. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1258 .
Grant A, Treweek S, Dreischulte T, Foy R, Guthrie B. Process evaluations for cluster-randomised trials of complex interventions: a proposed framework for design and reporting. Trials. 2013;14:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-15 .
doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-15
pubmed: 23311722
pmcid: 3600672
Fetters MD, Curry LA, Creswell JW. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Serv Res. 2013;48(6 Pt 2):2134–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117 .
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12117
pubmed: 24279835
pmcid: 4097839
Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter CR, Eldridge S, Grandes G, Griffiths CJ, Rycroft-Malone J, Meissner P, Murray E, Patel A, et al. Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) Statement. BMJ 2017, 356. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6795 .
Shaw SE, Paparini S, Murdoch J, Green J, Greenhalgh T, Hanckel B, James HM, Petticrew M, Wood GW, Papoutsi C. TRIPLE C reporting principles for case study evaluations of the role of context in complex interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023;23(1):115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01888-7 .
doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01888-7
pubmed: 37179308
pmcid: 10182844
Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, Griffey R, Hensley M. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(2):65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
pubmed: 20957426
Yin RK. Case study research and applications; Thousand Oaks. California: SAGE Publications Inc; 2018.
Fingertips: Public Health Data - National General Practice Profiles. Office for Health Improvement and Disparities. https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile/general-practice . Accessed 4 Jan 2024.
Morrow S, Daines L, Wiener-Ogilvie S, Steed L, McKee L, Caress A-L, Taylor SJC, Pinnock H. Exploring the perspectives of clinical professionals and support staff on implementing supported self-management for asthma in UK general practice: an IMP2ART qualitative study. Primary Care Respiratory Medicine. 2017;27(1):45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-017-0041-y .
doi: 10.1038/s41533-017-0041-y
pubmed: 28720751
pmcid: 5515882
Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S, Booth A, Rick J, Balain S. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci. 2007;2(1):40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-40 .
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-40
pubmed: 18053122
pmcid: 2213686
Borrelli B. The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials. J Public Health Dent. 2011;71(s1):S52-s63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00233.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00233.x
pubmed: 21656954
pmcid: 3074245
McCleary N, Andrews A, Buelo A, Captieux M, Morrow S, Wiener-Ogilvie S, Fletcher M, Steed L, Taylor SJC, Pinnock H. IMP2ART systematic review of education for healthcare professionals implementing supported self-management for asthma. npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine 2018, 28 (1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-018-0108-4 .
Moore GF, Evans RE, Hawkins J, Littlecott H, Melendez-Torres GJ, Bonell C, Murphy S. From complex social interventions to interventions in complex social systems: future directions and unresolved questions for intervention development and evaluation. Evaluation. 2019;25(1):23–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389018803219 .
doi: 10.1177/1356389018803219
pubmed: 30705608
Grant A, Bugge C, Wells M. Designing process evaluations using case study to explore the context of complex interventions evaluated in trials. Trials. 2020;21(1):982. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04880-4 .
doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04880-4
pubmed: 33246496
pmcid: 7694311
McIntyre SA, Francis JJ, Gould NJ, Lorencatto F. The use of theory in process evaluations conducted alongside randomized trials of implementation interventions: a systematic review. Translational Behavioral Medicine. 2018;10(1):168–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/iby110(acccessed6/28/2022) .
doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby110(acccessed6/28/2022)
Paparini S, Papoutsi C, Murdoch J, Green J, Petticrew M, Greenhalgh T, Shaw SE. Evaluating complex interventions in context: systematic, meta-narrative review of case study approaches. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021;21(1):225. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01418-3 .
Fletcher AJ. Applying critical realism in qualitative research: methodology meets method. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2017;20(2):181–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1144401 .
doi: 10.1080/13645579.2016.1144401