Centering Digital Health Equity During Technology Innovation: Protocol for a Comprehensive Scoping Review of Evidence-Based Tools and Approaches.

Validitron accessibility cost cost-effective digital health digital health equity digital health technology digital inequity digital innovation eHealth equity evidence-based evidence-based tools health informatics inclusion innovation mHealth participatory design technology technology innovation tools universal design

Journal

JMIR research protocols
ISSN: 1929-0748
Titre abrégé: JMIR Res Protoc
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101599504

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 21 11 2023
accepted: 18 04 2024
revised: 21 02 2024
medline: 5 6 2024
pubmed: 5 6 2024
entrez: 5 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In the rush to develop health technologies for the COVID-19 pandemic, the unintended consequence of digital health inequity or the inability of priority communities to access, use, and receive equal benefits from digital health technologies was not well examined. This scoping review will examine tools and approaches that can be used during digital technology innovation to improve equitable inclusion of priority communities in the development of digital health technologies. The results from this study will provide actionable insights for professionals in health care, health informatics, digital health, and technology development to proactively center equity during innovation. Based on the Arksey and O'Malley framework, this scoping review will consider priority communities' equitable involvement in digital technology innovation. Bibliographic databases in health, medicine, computing, and information sciences will be searched. Retrieved citations will be double screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria using Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation). Data will be charted using a tailored extraction tool and mapped to a digital health innovation pathway defined by the Centre for eHealth Research roadmap for eHealth technologies. An accompanying narrative synthesis will describe the outcomes in relation to the review's objectives. This scoping review is currently in progress. The search of databases and other sources returned a total of 4868 records. After the initial screening of titles and abstracts, 426 studies are undergoing dual full-text review. We are aiming to complete the full-text review stage by May 30, 2024, data extraction in October 2024, and subsequent synthesis in December 2024. Funding was received on October 1, 2023, from the Centre for Health Equity Incubator Grant Scheme, University of Melbourne, Australia. This paper will identify and recommend a series of validated tools and approaches that can be used by health care stakeholders and IT developers to produce equitable digital health technology across the Centre for eHealth Research roadmap. Identified evidence gaps, possible implications, and further research will be discussed. DERR1-10.2196/53855.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In the rush to develop health technologies for the COVID-19 pandemic, the unintended consequence of digital health inequity or the inability of priority communities to access, use, and receive equal benefits from digital health technologies was not well examined.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This scoping review will examine tools and approaches that can be used during digital technology innovation to improve equitable inclusion of priority communities in the development of digital health technologies. The results from this study will provide actionable insights for professionals in health care, health informatics, digital health, and technology development to proactively center equity during innovation.
METHODS METHODS
Based on the Arksey and O'Malley framework, this scoping review will consider priority communities' equitable involvement in digital technology innovation. Bibliographic databases in health, medicine, computing, and information sciences will be searched. Retrieved citations will be double screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria using Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation). Data will be charted using a tailored extraction tool and mapped to a digital health innovation pathway defined by the Centre for eHealth Research roadmap for eHealth technologies. An accompanying narrative synthesis will describe the outcomes in relation to the review's objectives.
RESULTS RESULTS
This scoping review is currently in progress. The search of databases and other sources returned a total of 4868 records. After the initial screening of titles and abstracts, 426 studies are undergoing dual full-text review. We are aiming to complete the full-text review stage by May 30, 2024, data extraction in October 2024, and subsequent synthesis in December 2024. Funding was received on October 1, 2023, from the Centre for Health Equity Incubator Grant Scheme, University of Melbourne, Australia.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This paper will identify and recommend a series of validated tools and approaches that can be used by health care stakeholders and IT developers to produce equitable digital health technology across the Centre for eHealth Research roadmap. Identified evidence gaps, possible implications, and further research will be discussed.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) UNASSIGNED
DERR1-10.2196/53855.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38838333
pii: v13i1e53855
doi: 10.2196/53855
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e53855

Informations de copyright

©Kara Burns, Shoshana Bloom, Cecily Gilbert, Bronwen Merner, Mahima Kalla, Sreshta Sheri, Cleva Villanueva, Amio Matenga Ikihele, Lama Nazer, Raymond Francis Sarmiento, Lindsay Stevens, Ngaree Blow, Wendy Chapman. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 05.06.2024.

Auteurs

Kara Burns (K)

Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.

Shoshana Bloom (S)

Equiti Health UK, London, United Kingdom.

Cecily Gilbert (C)

Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.

Bronwen Merner (B)

Centre for Health Equity, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.

Mahima Kalla (M)

Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.

Sreshta Sheri (S)

Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.

Cleva Villanueva (C)

Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City, Mexico.

Amio Matenga Ikihele (A)

Moana Connect, Auckland, New Zealand.

Lama Nazer (L)

King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.

Raymond Francis Sarmiento (RF)

National Telehealth Center, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.

Lindsay Stevens (L)

School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.

Ngaree Blow (N)

Medical Education Indigenous Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.

Wendy Chapman (W)

Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH