Recommendations of the SUFU/AUGS/ICS Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Surgical Publication Working Group: A Common Standard Minimum Data Set for the Literature.
Journal
Urogynecology (Philadelphia, Pa.)
ISSN: 2771-1897
Titre abrégé: Urogynecology (Phila)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918452588006676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Jun 2024
05 Jun 2024
Historique:
pubmed:
6
6
2024
medline:
6
6
2024
entrez:
5
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Relevant, meaningful, and achievable data points are critical in objectively assessing quality, utility, and outcomes in female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery. A minimum data set female SUI surgery studies was proposed by the first American Urological Association guidelines on the surgical management of female SUI in 1997, but recommendation adherence has been suboptimal. The Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Surgical Publication Working Group (WG) was created from members of several prominent organizations to formulate a recommended standard of study structure, description, and minimum outcome data set to be utilized in designing and publishing future SUI studies. The goal of this WG was to create a body of evidence better able to assess the outcomes of female SUI surgery. The WG reviewed the minimum data set proposed in the 1997 AUA SUI Guideline document, and other relevant literature. The body of literature was examined in the context of the profound changes in the field over the past 25 years. Through a DELPHI process, a standard study structure and minimum data set were generated. Care was taken to balance the value of several meaningful and relevant data points against the burden of creating an excessively difficult or restrictive standard that would disincentivize widespread adoption and negatively impact manuscript production and acceptance. The WG outlined standardization in four major areas: 1) study design, 2) pretreatment demographics and characterization of the study population, 3) intraoperative events, and 4) post-treatment evaluation, and complications. Forty-two items were evaluated and graded as: STANDARD - must be included; ADDITIONAL - may be included for a specific study and is inclusive of the Standard items; OPTIMAL - may be included for a comprehensive study and is inclusive of the Standard and Additional items; UNNECESSARY/LEGACY - not relevant. A reasonable, achievable, and clinically meaningful minimum data set has been constructed. A structured framework will allow future surgical interventions for female SUI to be objectively scrutinized and compared in a clinically significant manner. Ultimately, such a data set, if adopted by the academic community, will enhance the quality of the scientific literature, and ultimately improve short and long-term outcomes for female patients undergoing surgery to correct SUI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38838689
doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001538
pii: 02273501-990000000-00238
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC, by Elsevier B.V on behalf of International Continence Society, and by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of American Urogynecologic Society.
Références
Leach GE, Dmochowski RR, Appell RA, et al. Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. The American Urological Association. J Urol . 1997;158(3 Pt 1):875–880.
Rovner ES, Wright C, Messer H. Adherence to the 1997 American Urological Association guidelines for the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Urology . 2008;71(2):239–242.
Bauer A, Zheng Y, Furlong D, et al. Adherence to the Minimum Data Set Suggested by AUA Guidelines for the Surgical Treatment of SUI. Urology . 2023;175:62–66.
Tuong MN, Patel NA, Zillioux JM, et al. Urinary Incontinence Research: Compliance With Research Standards for Clinical Studies. Urology . 2020;137:55–59.
Lee RS, DeAntoni E, Daneshgari F. Compliance with recommendations of the urodynamic society for standards of efficacy for evaluation of treatment outcomes in urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn . 2002;21(5):482–485.
Percie du Sert N, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol 2020. 2020;18(7):e3000410.
Cuschieri S. The CONSORT statement. Saudi J Anaesth . 2019 Apr;13(Suppl 1):S27–S30.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg . 2014 Dec;12(12):1495–1499.
Diokno AC, Brock BM, Brown MB, et al. Prevalence of urinary incontinence and other urological symptoms in the noninstitutionalized elderly. J Urol . 1986;136:1021–1025.
Reddy M, Kusin S, Christie A, et al. A deception study to avoid recall bias confirms similar scores for 3 validated questionnaires in the office or over the phone in women with or without urinary incontinence. J Urol . 2022;208:1288–1294.
Malik RD, Hess DS, Christie A, et al. Domain comparison between six validated questionnaires administered to women with urinary incontinence. Urology . 2019;132:75–80.
Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, et al. Midurethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev . 2017 Jul 31;7(7):CD006375.
Zyczynski HM, Sirls LT, Greer WJ, et al; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Findings of universal cystoscopy at incontinence surgery and their sequelae. Am J Obstet Gynecol . 2014 May;210(5):480.e1.
Kobashi KC, Albo ME, Dmochowski R, et al. Surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: AUA/SUFU guideline J Urology . 2017;198:875–883.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg . 2004 Aug;240(2):205–213.
Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, et al; International Urogynecological Association; International Continence Society; Joint IUGA/ICS Working Group on Complications Terminology. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn . 2011 Jan;30(1):2–12.
Zimmern PE, Gormley EA, Stoddard AM, et al. Management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after Burch and sling procedures. Neurourol Urodyn . 2016 Mar;35(3):344–348.
Nager CW, Brubaker L, Litman HJ, et al. A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery. New Eng J Med . 2012;366:1987–1997.