A multi-institutional machine learning algorithm for prognosticating facial nerve injury following microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannoma.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 06 2024
05 06 2024
Historique:
received:
18
11
2023
accepted:
26
05
2024
medline:
6
6
2024
pubmed:
6
6
2024
entrez:
5
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are the most common tumor of the skull base with available treatment options that carry a risk of iatrogenic injury to the facial nerve, which can significantly impact patients' quality of life. As facial nerve outcomes remain challenging to prognosticate, we endeavored to utilize machine learning to decipher predictive factors relevant to facial nerve outcomes following microsurgical resection of VS. A database of patient-, tumor- and surgery-specific features was constructed via retrospective chart review of 242 consecutive patients who underwent microsurgical resection of VS over a 7-year study period. This database was then used to train non-linear supervised machine learning classifiers to predict facial nerve preservation, defined as House-Brackmann (HB) I vs. facial nerve injury, defined as HB II-VI, as determined at 6-month outpatient follow-up. A random forest algorithm demonstrated 90.5% accuracy, 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity in facial nerve injury prognostication. A random variable (rv) was generated by randomly sampling a Gaussian distribution and used as a benchmark to compare the predictiveness of other features. This analysis revealed age, body mass index (BMI), case length and the tumor dimension representing tumor growth towards the brainstem as prognosticators of facial nerve injury. When validated via prospective assessment of facial nerve injury risk, this model demonstrated 84% accuracy. Here, we describe the development of a machine learning algorithm to predict the likelihood of facial nerve injury following microsurgical resection of VS. In addition to serving as a clinically applicable tool, this highlights the potential of machine learning to reveal non-linear relationships between variables which may have clinical value in prognostication of outcomes for high-risk surgical procedures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38839778
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63161-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-63161-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
12963Subventions
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : T32NS091006-07
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Acoustic Neuroma. NORD. https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/acoustic-neuroma/ (accessed 29 Nov 2021).
Vestibular Schwannoma (Acoustic Neuroma) and Neurofibromatosis. NIDCD. https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/vestibular-schwannoma-acoustic-neuroma-and-neurofibromatosis (accessed 29 Nov 2021).
Mohammadi, A. & Jufas, N. Sudden death due to vestibular schwannoma: Caution in emergent management. Otol. Neurotol. 37(5), 564–567. https://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0000000000001004 (2016).
doi: 10.1097/mao.0000000000001004
pubmed: 26945316
Lin, E. P. & Crane, B. T. The management and imaging of vestibular schwannomas. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 38(11), 2034. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5213 (2017).
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5213
pubmed: 28546250
pmcid: 5690865
Ferroli, P., Bosio, L. & Broggi, M. Facial nerve sparing surgery for large vestibular schwannomas. Acta Neurochir. (Wien). 159(7), 1213–1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3216-y (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3216-y
pubmed: 28534074
Roland, J. T. Jr. et al. Cranial nerve preservation in surgery for large acoustic neuromas. Skull Base. 14(2), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-828699 (2004).
doi: 10.1055/s-2004-828699
pubmed: 16145589
pmcid: 1151676
Profant, O. et al. Decision making on vestibular schwannoma treatment: Predictions based on machine-learning analysis. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 18376. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97819-x (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97819-x
pubmed: 34526580
pmcid: 8443556
Cha, D., Shin, S. H., Kim, S. H., Choi, J. Y. & Moon, I. S. Machine learning approach for prediction of hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 7136. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64175-1 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64175-1
pubmed: 32346085
pmcid: 7188896
Slattery, W. H. 3rd., Fisher, L. M., Yoon, G., Sorensen, G. & Lev, M. Magnetic resonance imaging scanner reliability for measuring changes in vestibular schwannoma size. Otol. Neurotol. 24(4), 666–670. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129492-200307000-00022 (2003) (discussion 670–1).
doi: 10.1097/00129492-200307000-00022
pubmed: 12851562
Choi, Y. et al. Maximum diameter versus volumetric assessment for the response evaluation of vestibular schwannomas receiving stereotactic radiotherapy. Radiat. Oncol. J. 36(2), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2018.00031 (2018).
doi: 10.3857/roj.2018.00031
pubmed: 29983031
pmcid: 6074071
Koo, T. K. & Li, M. Y. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J. Chiropr. Med. 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
pubmed: 27330520
pmcid: 4913118
D’Agostino, R. & Pearson, E. S. Tests for departure from normality. Biometrika. 60(3), 613–622. https://doi.org/10.2307/2335012 (1973).
doi: 10.2307/2335012
Sebastian Raschka, V. M. Python Machine Learning: Machine Learning and Deep Learning with Python, scikit-learn and TensorFlow 2. 3rd edn (Packt Publishing Ltd., 2019).
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O. & Kegelmeyer, W. P. SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J. Artif. Int. Res. 16(1), 321–357 (2002).
Wilson, R. C., Shenhav, A., Straccia, M. & Cohen, J. D. The eighty five percent rule for optimal learning. Nat. Commun. 10(1), 4646. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12552-4 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12552-4
pubmed: 31690723
pmcid: 6831579
Dobel, C., Miltner, W. H., Witte, O. W., Volk, G. F. & Guntinas-Lichius, O. Emotional impact of facial palsy. Laryngorhinootologie. 92(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1327624 (2013) (Emotionale Auswirkungen einer Fazialisparese).
doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1327624
pubmed: 23065673
Saadi, R., Shokri, T., Schaefer, E., Hollenbeak, C. & Lighthall, J. G. Depression rates after facial paralysis. Ann. Plast. Surg. 83(2), 190–194. https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000001908 (2019).
doi: 10.1097/sap.0000000000001908
pubmed: 31232802
Joseph, S. S. et al. Evaluation of patients with facial palsy and ophthalmic sequelae: A 23-year retrospective review. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 24(5), 341–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2017.1294186 (2017).
doi: 10.1080/09286586.2017.1294186
pubmed: 28319442
Ren, Y., MacDonald, B. V., Tawfik, K. O., Schwartz, M. S. & Friedman, R. A. Clinical predictors of facial nerve outcomes after surgical resection of vestibular schwannoma. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 164(5), 1085–1093. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820961389 (2021).
doi: 10.1177/0194599820961389
pubmed: 33048002
Sun, Y., Yang, J., Li, T., Gao, K. & Tong, X. Nomogram for predicting facial nerve outcomes after surgical resection of vestibular schwannoma. Front. Neurol. 12, 817071. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.817071 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.817071
pubmed: 35211077
Tawfik, K. O., Alexander, T. H., Saliba, J., Mastrodimos, B. & Cueva, R. A. Predicting long-term facial nerve outcomes after resection of vestibular schwannoma. Otol. Neurotol. 41(10), e1328–e1332. https://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0000000000002883 (2020).
doi: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002883
pubmed: 33492809
Troude, L. et al. Predictive factors of early postoperative and long-term facial nerve function after large vestibular schwannoma surgery. World Neurosurg. 127, e599–e608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.218 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.218
pubmed: 30930324
Axon, P. R. & Ramsden, R. T. Intraoperative electromyography for predicting facial function in vestibular schwannoma surgery. Laryngoscope. 109(6), 922–926. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-199906000-00015 (1999).
doi: 10.1097/00005537-199906000-00015
pubmed: 10369283
Rajkomar, A., Dean, J. & Kohane, I. Machine learning in medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 380(14), 1347–1358. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1814259 (2019).
doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1814259
pubmed: 30943338
Karargyris, A. et al. Federated benchmarking of medical artificial intelligence with MedPerf. Nat. Mach. Intell. 5(7), 799–810. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-023-00652-2 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s42256-023-00652-2
pubmed: 38706981
pmcid: 11068064
Erickson, N. J. et al. Koos classification of vestibular schwannomas: A reliability study. Neurosurgery. 85(3), 409–414. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy409 (2019).
doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy409
pubmed: 30169695
Lawson McLean, A. C., McLean, A. L. & Rosahl, S. K. Evaluating vestibular schwannoma size and volume on magnetic resonance imaging: An inter- and intra-rater agreement study. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 145, 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.04.010 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.04.010
pubmed: 27101086
Fenton, J. E., Chin, R. Y., Fagan, P. A., Sterkers, O. & Sterkers, J. M. Predictive factors of long-term facial nerve function after vestibular schwannoma surgery. Otol. Neurotol. 23(3), 388–392. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129492-200205000-00027 (2002).
doi: 10.1097/00129492-200205000-00027
pubmed: 11981400
Rivas, A. et al. A model for early prediction of facial nerve recovery after vestibular schwannoma surgery. Otol. Neurotol. 32(5), 826–833. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31821b0afd (2011).
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31821b0afd
pubmed: 21527865
Moffat, D. A., Parker, R. A., Hardy, D. G. & Macfarlane, R. Factors affecting final facial nerve outcome following vestibular schwannoma surgery. J. Laryngol. Otol. 128(5), 406–415. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215114000541 (2014).
doi: 10.1017/s0022215114000541
pubmed: 24685071
Raslan, A. M., Liu, J. K., McMenomey, S. O. & Delashaw, J. B. Jr. Staged resection of large vestibular schwannomas. J. Neurosurg. 116(5), 1126–1133. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.1.Jns111402 (2012).
doi: 10.3171/2012.1.Jns111402
pubmed: 22360572
Bloch, O. et al. Factors associated with preservation of facial nerve function after surgical resection of vestibular schwannoma. J. Neuro-Oncol. 102(2), 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-010-0315-5 (2011).
doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0315-5
Helal, A. et al. Differential impact of advanced age on clinical outcomes after vestibular schwannoma resection in the very elderly: Cohort study. Oper. Neurosurg. (Hagerstown). 21(3), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opab170 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/ons/opab170
pubmed: 34038941
Macielak, R. J. et al. The effect of age on facial nerve recovery after vestibular schwannoma resection. Otol. Neurotol. 44(7), 725–729. https://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0000000000003937 (2023).
doi: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003937
pubmed: 37400264
Murphy, M. E. et al. Morbid obesity increases risk of morbidity and reoperation in resection of benign cranial nerve neoplasms. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 148, 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.06.020 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.06.020
pubmed: 27434528
Lipschitz, N. et al. Obesity is not associated with postoperative complications after vestibular schwannoma surgery in a large single institution series. Otol. Neurotol. 40(10), 1373–1377. https://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0000000000002397 (2019).
doi: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002397
pubmed: 31634280
Moss, E. L. et al. Impact of obesity on surgeon ergonomics in robotic and straight-stick laparoscopic surgery. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 27(5), 1063–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.07.009 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.07.009
pubmed: 31326633
Sers, R., Forrester, S., Zecca, M., Ward, S. & Moss, E. The impact of patient body mass index on surgeon posture during simulated laparoscopy. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.24.20237123 (2020).
doi: 10.1101/2020.11.24.20237123
Sers, R., Forrester, S., Zecca, M., Ward, S. & Moss, E. Objective assessment of surgeon kinematics during simulated laparoscopic surgery: A preliminary evaluation of the effect of high body mass index models. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 17(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-021-02455-5 (2022).
doi: 10.1007/s11548-021-02455-5
pubmed: 34302596
Setty, P. et al. Endoscopic resection of vestibular schwannomas. J. Neurol. Surg. B Skull Base. 76(3), 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1543974 (2015).
doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1543974
pubmed: 26225307
pmcid: 4433394
Veldeman, M. et al. Three-dimensional exoscopic versus microscopic resection of vestibular schwannomas: A comparative series. Oper. Neurosurg. (Hagerstown). 24(5), 507–513. https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000000602 (2023).
doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000602
pubmed: 36715988
Cheng, H. et al. Prolonged operative duration is associated with complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Surg. Res. 229, 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.022 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.022
pubmed: 29936980
Teranishi, Y., Kohno, M., Sora, S., Sato, H. & Nagata, O. Hypervascular vestibular schwannomas: Clinical characteristics, angiographical classification, and surgical considerations. Oper. Neurosurg. 15(3), 251–261 (2018).
doi: 10.1093/ons/opx246
Jo, D. The interpretation bias and trap of multicenter clinical research. Korean J. Pain. 33(3), 199–200. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2020.33.3.199 (2020).
doi: 10.3344/kjp.2020.33.3.199
pubmed: 32606263
pmcid: 7336343
Neve, O. M. et al. Fully automated 3D vestibular schwannoma segmentation with and without gadolinium-based contrast material: A multicenter, multivendor study. Radiol. Artif. Intell. 4(4), e210300. https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.210300 (2022).
doi: 10.1148/ryai.210300
pubmed: 35923375
pmcid: 9344213
Shapey, J. et al. Data from: Segmentation of vestibular schwannoma from magnetic resonance imaging: An open annotated dataset and baseline algorithm. Sci. Data https://doi.org/10.7937/TCIA.9YTJ-5Q73 (2021).
doi: 10.7937/TCIA.9YTJ-5Q73
pubmed: 34711849
pmcid: 8553833
Shapey, J. et al. An artificial intelligence framework for automatic segmentation and volumetry of vestibular schwannomas from contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and high-resolution T2-weighted MRI. J. Neurosurg. JNS. 134(1), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.9.JNS191949 (2021).
doi: 10.3171/2019.9.JNS191949
Wang, H., Qu, T., Bernstein, K., Barbee, D. & Kondziolka, D. Automatic segmentation of vestibular schwannomas from T1-weighted MRI with a deep neural network. Radiat. Oncol. 18(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02263-y (2023).
doi: 10.1186/s13014-023-02263-y
pubmed: 37158968
pmcid: 10169364
Su, H. et al. Multilevel threshold image segmentation for COVID-19 chest radiography: A framework using horizontal and vertical multiverse optimization. Comput. Biol. Med. 146, 105618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105618 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105618
pubmed: 35690477
pmcid: 9113963
Qi, A. et al. Directional mutation and crossover boosted ant colony optimization with application to COVID-19 X-ray image segmentation. Comput. Biol. Med. 148, 105810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105810 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105810
pubmed: 35868049
pmcid: 9278012
Hu, K. et al. Colorectal polyp region extraction using saliency detection network with neutrosophic enhancement. Comput. Biol. Med. 147, 105760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105760 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105760
pubmed: 35803078
Jiang, X. et al. BiFTransNet: A unified and simultaneous segmentation network for gastrointestinal images of CT & MRI. Comput. Biol. Med. 165, 107326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107326 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107326
pubmed: 37619324
Mei, Z. et al. Secure multi-dimensional data retrieval with access control and range query in the cloud. Inf. Syst. 122, 102343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2024.102343 (2024).
doi: 10.1016/j.is.2024.102343
Wu, Z. et al. An effective method for the protection of user health topic privacy for health information services. World Wide Web. 26(6), 3837–3859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-023-01208-5 (2023).
doi: 10.1007/s11280-023-01208-5
She, Y. et al. Development and validation of a deep learning model for non-small cell lung cancer survival. JAMA Netw. Open. 3(6), e205842. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5842 (2020).
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5842
pubmed: 32492161
pmcid: 7272121
Ye, R. Z. et al. DeepImageTranslator: A free, user-friendly graphical interface for image translation using deep-learning and its applications in 3D CT image analysis. SLAS Technol. 27(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.slast.2021.10.014 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.slast.2021.10.014
pubmed: 35058205