Microbial competition for phosphorus limits the CO
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Jun 2024
05 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
03
04
2023
accepted:
30
04
2024
medline:
6
6
2024
pubmed:
6
6
2024
entrez:
5
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The capacity for terrestrial ecosystems to sequester additional carbon (C) with rising CO
Identifiants
pubmed: 38839955
doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07491-0
pii: 10.1038/s41586-024-07491-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. Crown.
Références
Wieder, W. R., Cleveland, C. C., Smith, W. K. & Todd-Brown, K. Future productivity and carbon storage limited by terrestrial nutrient availability. Nat. Geosci. 8, 441–444 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/ngeo2413
Terrer, C. et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus constrain the CO
doi: 10.1038/s41558-019-0545-2
Ellsworth, D. S. et al. Elevated CO
doi: 10.1038/nclimate3235
Körner, C. et al. Carbon flux and growth in mature deciduous forest trees exposed to elevated CO
pubmed: 16123297
doi: 10.1126/science.1113977
Jiang, M. et al. The fate of carbon in a mature forest under carbon dioxide enrichment. Nature 580, 227–231 (2020).
pubmed: 32269351
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2128-9
Sigurdsson, B. D., Medhurst, J. L., Wallin, G., Eggertsson, O. & Linder, S. Growth of mature boreal Norway spruce was not affected by elevated CO
pubmed: 23878169
doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpt043
Fleischer, K. et al. Amazon forest response to CO
doi: 10.1038/s41561-019-0404-9
Hawkesford M. et al. in Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Plants 4th edn (eds Rengel, Z. et al.) Ch. 6, 201–228 (Elsevier, 2023).
Vitousek, P. M., Porder, S., Houlton, B. Z. & Chadwick, O. A. Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen–phosphorus interactions. Ecol. Appl. 20, 5–15 (2010).
pubmed: 20349827
doi: 10.1890/08-0127.1
Walker, T. W. & Syers, J. K. The fate of phosphorus during pedogenesis. Geoderma 15, 1–19 (1976).
doi: 10.1016/0016-7061(76)90066-5
Odum, E. P. The strategy of ecosystem development: an understanding of ecological succession provides a basis for resolving man’s conflict with nature. Science 164, 262–270 (1969).
pubmed: 5776636
doi: 10.1126/science.164.3877.262
Cleveland, C. C. et al. Patterns of new versus recycled primary production in the terrestrial biosphere. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 12733–12737 (2013).
pubmed: 23861492
pmcid: 3732943
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302768110
Turner, B. L. et al. Soil microbial biomass and the fate of phosphorus during long-term ecosystem development. Plant Soil 367, 225–234 (2013).
doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1493-z
Peñuelas, J. et al. Human-induced nitrogen–phosphorus imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across the globe. Nat. Commun. 4, 2934 (2013).
pubmed: 24343268
doi: 10.1038/ncomms3934
Du, E. et al. Global patterns of terrestrial nitrogen and phosphorus limitation. Nat. Geosci. 13, 221–226 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41561-019-0530-4
Hou, E. et al. Global meta-analysis shows pervasive phosphorus limitation of aboveground plant production in natural terrestrial ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 11, 637 (2020).
pubmed: 32005808
pmcid: 6994524
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14492-w
Norby, R. J. et al. Model–data synthesis for the next generation of forest free‐air CO
pubmed: 26249015
doi: 10.1111/nph.13593
Cunha, H. F. V. et al. Direct evidence for phosphorus limitation on Amazon forest productivity. Nature 608, 558–562 (2022).
pubmed: 35948632
doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05085-2
Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global carbon budget 2022. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 14, 4811–4900 (2022).
doi: 10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022
Walker, A. P. et al. Integrating the evidence for a terrestrial carbon sink caused by increasing atmospheric CO
pubmed: 32789857
doi: 10.1111/nph.16866
Jiang, M. et al. Low phosphorus supply constrains plant responses to elevated CO
doi: 10.1111/gcb.15277
Vitousek, P. M. & Reiners, W. A. Ecosystem succession and nutrient retention: a hypothesis. BioScience 25, 376–381 (1975).
doi: 10.2307/1297148
Attiwill, P. M. & Adams, M. A. Nutrient cycling in forests. New Phytol. 124, 561–582 (1993).
pubmed: 33874438
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03847.x
Jiang, M., Caldararu, S., Zaehle, S., Ellsworth, D. S. & Medlyn, B. E. Towards a more physiological representation of vegetation phosphorus processes in land surface models. New Phytol. 222, 1223–1229 (2019).
pubmed: 30659603
doi: 10.1111/nph.15688
Crous, K. Y., Ósvaldsson, A. & Ellsworth, D. S. Is phosphorus limiting in a mature Eucalyptus woodland? Phosphorus fertilization stimulates stem growth. Plant Soil 391, 293–305 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s11104-015-2426-4
Crous, K. Y., Wujeska-Klause, A., Jiang, M., Medlyn, B. E. & Ellsworth, D. S. Nitrogen and phosphorus retranslocation of leaves and stemwood in a mature Eucalyptus forest exposed to 5 years of elevated CO
pubmed: 31214212
pmcid: 6554339
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00664
Piñeiro, J., Ochoa-Hueso, R., Drake, J. E., Tjoelker, M. G. & Power, S. A. Water availability drives fine root dynamics in a Eucalyptus woodland under elevated atmospheric CO
doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.13660
Drake, J. E. et al. Short-term carbon cycling responses of a mature eucalypt woodland to gradual stepwise enrichment of atmospheric CO
doi: 10.1111/gcb.13109
Castañeda-Gómez, L. et al. Impacts of elevated carbon dioxide on carbon gains and losses from soil and associated microbes in a Eucalyptus woodland. Soil Biol. Biochem. 143, 107734 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107734
Hasegawa, S., Macdonald, C. A. & Power, S. A. Elevated carbon dioxide increases soil nitrogen and phosphorus availability in a phosphorus-limited Eucalyptus woodland. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1628–1643 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.13147
Xu, X., Thornton, P. E. & Post, W. M. A global analysis of soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystems. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22, 737–749 (2013).
doi: 10.1111/geb.12029
Cross, A. F. & Schlesinger, W. H. A literature review and evaluation of the Hedley fractionation: applications to the biogeochemical cycle of soil phosphorus in natural ecosystems. Geoderma 64, 197–214 (1995).
doi: 10.1016/0016-7061(94)00023-4
Pihlblad, J., Andresen, L. C., Macdonald, C. A., Ellsworth, D. S. & Carrillo, Y. The influence of elevated CO
doi: 10.5194/bg-20-505-2023
Hasegawa, S. et al. Elevated CO
doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12943
Ochoa-Hueso, R. et al. Rhizosphere-driven increase in nitrogen and phosphorus availability under elevated atmospheric CO
doi: 10.1007/s11104-017-3212-2
Richardson, A. E. & Simpson, R. J. Soil microorganisms mediating phosphorus availability. Plant Physiol. 156, 989–996 (2011).
pubmed: 21606316
pmcid: 3135950
doi: 10.1104/pp.111.175448
Castañeda-Gómez, L., Powell, J. R., Pendall, E. & Carrillo, Y. Phosphorus availability and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi limit soil C cycling and influence plant responses to elevated CO
doi: 10.1007/s10533-022-00939-3
Sinsabaugh, R. L. et al. Stoichiometry of microbial carbon use efficiency in soils. Ecol. Monogr. 86, 172–189 (2016).
doi: 10.1890/15-2110.1
Wang, Y. & Lambers, H. Root-released organic anions in response to low phosphorus availability: recent progress, challenges and future perspectives. Plant Soil 447, 135–156 (2020).
doi: 10.1007/s11104-019-03972-8
Iversen, C. M., Hooker, T. D., Classen, A. T. & Norby, R. J. Net mineralization of N at deeper soil depths as a potential mechanism for sustained forest production under elevated [CO
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02240.x
McKinley, D. C., Romero, J. C., Hungate, B. A., Drake, B. G. & Megonigal, J. P. Does deep soil N availability sustain long-term ecosystem responses to elevated CO
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01836.x
Achat, D. L., Augusto, L., Gallet-Budynek, A. & Loustau, D. Future challenges in coupled C-N-P cycle models for terrestrial ecosystems under global change: a review. Biogeochemistry. 131, 173–202 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s10533-016-0274-9
Medlyn, B. E. et al. Using models to guide field experiments: a priori predictions for the CO
doi: 10.1111/gcb.13268
Grassi, G. et al. The key role of forests in meeting climate targets requires science for credible mitigation. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 220–226 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/nclimate3227
Goll, D. S. et al. Nutrient limitation reduces land carbon uptake in simulations with a model of combined carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycling. Biogeosciences. 9, 3547–3569 (2012).
doi: 10.5194/bg-9-3547-2012
Zhang, Q., Wang, Y. P., Matear, R. J., Pitman, A. J. & Dai, Y. J. Nitrogen and phosphorus limitations significantly reduce future allowable CO
doi: 10.1002/2013GL058352
Allen, K., Fisher, J. B., Phillips, R. P., Powers, J. S. & Brzostek, E. R. Modeling the carbon cost of plant nitrogen and phosphorus uptake across temperate and tropical forests. Front. For. Glob. Change 3, 43 (2020).
doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2020.00043
Yu, L., Ahrens, B., Wutzler, T., Schrumpf, M. & Zaehle, S. Jena Soil Model (JSM v1.0; revision 1934): a microbial soil organic carbon model integrated with nitrogen and phosphorus processes. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 783–803 (2020).
doi: 10.5194/gmd-13-783-2020
Braghiere, R. K. et al. Modeling global carbon costs of plant nitrogen and phosphorus acquisition. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 14, e2022MS003204 (2022).
pubmed: 36245670
pmcid: 9539603
doi: 10.1029/2022MS003204
Prescott C. E. et al. Surplus carbon drives allocation and plant-soil interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 1110–1118 (2020).
Reichert, T. et al. Plant phosphorus-use and -acquisition strategies in Amazonia. New Phytol. 234, 1126–1143 (2022).
pubmed: 35060130
doi: 10.1111/nph.17985
Ross, G. M. et al. Metabarcoding mites: three years of elevated CO
doi: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2020.150667
Pathare, V. S. et al. Water availability affects seasonal CO
doi: 10.1111/gcb.13778
Teste, F. P., Jones, M. D. & Dickie, I. A. Dual-mycorrhizal plants: their ecology and relevance. New Phytol. 225, 1839–1851 (2019).
Zhou, X. M. et al. A cool spot in a biodiversity hotspot: why do tall Eucalyptus forests in southwest Australia exhibit low diversity? Plant Soil 476, 669–688 (2022).
doi: 10.1007/s11104-022-05559-2
Shangguan, W., Dai, Y., Duan, Q., Liu, B. & Yuan, H. A global soil data set for earth system modeling. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 6, 249–263 (2014).
doi: 10.1002/2013MS000293
Batjes N. H. Overview of Soil Phosphorus Data From a Large International Soil Database (ISRIC - World Soil Information, 2011).
Tian D. et al. A global database of paired leaf nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations of terrestrial plants. Ecology https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2812 (2019).
Yu, Z. et al. Natural forests promote phosphorus retention in soil. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 1678–1689 (2022).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.15996
Jiang M. et al. EucFACE phosphorus budget data repository. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25596213.v3 (2024).
Gimeno, T. E., McVicar, T. R., O’Grady, A. P., Tissue, D. T. & Ellsworth, D. S. Elevated CO
doi: 10.1111/gcb.14139
Paul, K. I. et al. Development and testing of allometric equations for estimating above-ground biomass of mixed-species environmental plantings. For. Ecol. Manage. 310, 483–494 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.054
Reidinger, S., Ramsey, M. H. & Hartley, S. E. Rapid and accurate analyses of silicon and phosphorus in plants using a portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer. New Phytol. 195, 699–706 (2012).
pubmed: 22671981
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04179.x
Gherlenda, A. N. et al. Precipitation, not CO
doi: 10.1007/s11104-015-2683-2
Gherlenda, A. N., Moore, B. D., Haigh, A. M., Johnson, S. N. & Riegler, M. Insect herbivory in a mature Eucalyptus woodland canopy depends on leaf phenology but not CO
pubmed: 27760541
pmcid: 5072302
doi: 10.1186/s12898-016-0102-z
Duursma, R. A. et al. Canopy leaf area of a mature evergreen Eucalyptus woodland does not respond to elevated atmospheric CO
doi: 10.1111/gcb.13151
Couture, J. J., Meehan, T. D., Kruger, E. L. & Lindroth, R. L. Insect herbivory alters impact of atmospheric change on northern temperate forests. Nat. Plants 1, 15016 (2015).
pubmed: 27246883
doi: 10.1038/nplants.2015.16
Murphy, J. & Riley, J. P. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal. Chim. Acta 27, 31–36 (1962).
doi: 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5
Veneklaas, E. J. Phosphorus resorption and tissue longevity of roots and leaves—importance for phosphorus use efficiency and ecosystem phosphorus cycles. Plant Soil 476, 627–637 (2022).
doi: 10.1007/s11104-022-05522-1
Ohno, T. & Zibilske, L. M. Determination of low concentrations of phosphorus in soil extracts using Malachite Green. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55, 892–895 (1991).
doi: 10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500030046x
Condron, L. M., Moir, J. O., Tiessen, H. & Stewart, J. W. B. Critical evaluation of methods for determining total organic phosphorus in tropical soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54, 1261–1266 (1990).
doi: 10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400050010x
Bowman, R. A. & Moir, J. O. Basic EDTA as an extractant for soil organic phosphorus. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57, 1516–1518 (1993).
doi: 10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700060020x
Rayment G. E. & Lyons D. J. Soil Chemical Methods—Australasia (CSIRO, 2010); ebooks.publish.csiro.au/content/ISBN/9780643101364
Farrell, M. et al. Biochar and fertiliser applications influence phosphorus fractionation and wheat yield. Biol. Fertil. Soils 50, 169–178 (2014).
doi: 10.1007/s00374-013-0845-z
Chen, R. R., Condron, L. M., Davis, M. R. & Sherlock, R. R. Effects of afforestation on phosphorus dynamics and biological properties in a New Zealand grassland soil. Plant Soil 220, 151–163 (2000).
doi: 10.1023/A:1004712401721
Barrow, N. J., Sen, A., Roy, N. & Debnath, A. The soil phosphate fractionation fallacy. Plant Soil 459, 1–11 (2021).
doi: 10.1007/s11104-020-04476-6
Brookes, P. C., Powlson, D. S. & Jenkinson, D. S. Measurement of microbial biomass phosphorus in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 14, 319–329 (1982).
doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(82)90001-3
Wang, R. et al. Global forest carbon uptake due to nitrogen and phosphorus deposition from 1850 to 2100. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 4854–4872 (2017).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.13766
Körner, C. Plant CO
pubmed: 17083672
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01886.x
Greenland, S. et al. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 31, 337–350 (2016).
pubmed: 27209009
pmcid: 4877414
doi: 10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3
Nakagawa, S. & Cuthill, I. C. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol. Rev. 82, 591–605 (2007).
pubmed: 17944619
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00027.x
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 69, 1–48 (2015).
Carpenter, J. & Bithell, J. Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. Stat. Med. 19, 1141–1164 (2000).
pubmed: 10797513
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000515)19:9<1141::AID-SIM479>3.0.CO;2-F
Muff, S., Nilsen, E. B., O’Hara, R. B. & Nater, C. R. Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence. Trends Ecol. Evol. 37, 203–210 (2022).
pubmed: 34799145
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.10.009
Jiang, M. et al. Data for ‘Microbial competition for phosphorus limits CO