Smoking data quality of primary care practices in comparison with smoking data from the New Zealand Māori and Pacific abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programme: an observational study.
Data quality
Risk factor
Screening
Smoking
Tobacco
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Jun 2024
05 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
18
09
2023
accepted:
31
05
2024
medline:
6
6
2024
pubmed:
6
6
2024
entrez:
5
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Quality smoking data is crucial for assessing smoking-related health risk and eligibility for interventions related to that risk. Smoking information collected in primary care practices (PCPs) is a major data source; however, little is known about the PCP smoking data quality. This project compared PCP smoking data to that collected in the Māori and Pacific Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) screening programme. A two stage review was conducted. In Stage 1, data quality was assessed by comparing the PCP smoking data recorded close to AAA screening episodes with the data collected from participants at the AAA screening session. Inter-rater reliability was analysed using Cohen's kappa scores. In Stage 2, an audit of longitudinal smoking status was conducted, of a subset of participants potentially misclassified in Stage 1. Data were compared in three groups: current smoker (smoke at least monthly), ex-smoker (stopped > 1 month ago) and never smoker (smoked < 100 cigarettes in lifetime). Of the 1841 people who underwent AAA screening, 1716 (93%) had PCP smoking information. Stage 1 PCP smoking data showed 82% concordance with the AAA data (adjusted kappa 0.76). Fewer current or ex-smokers were recorded in PCP data. In the Stage 2 analysis of discordant and missing data (N = 313), 212 were enrolled in the 29 participating PCPs, and of these 13% were deceased and 41% had changed PCP. Of the 93 participants still enrolled in the participating PCPs, smoking status had been updated for 43%. Data on quantity, duration, or quit date of smoking were largely missing in PCP records. The AAA data of ex-smokers who were classified as never smokers in the Stage 2 PCP data (N = 27) showed a median smoking cessation duration of 32 years (range 0-50 years), with 85% (N = 23) having quit more than 15 years ago. PCP smoking data quality compared with the AAA data is consistent with international findings. PCP data captured fewer current and ex-smokers, suggesting ongoing improvement is important. Intervention programmes based on smoking status should consider complementary mechanisms to ensure eligible individuals are not missed from programme invitation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Quality smoking data is crucial for assessing smoking-related health risk and eligibility for interventions related to that risk. Smoking information collected in primary care practices (PCPs) is a major data source; however, little is known about the PCP smoking data quality. This project compared PCP smoking data to that collected in the Māori and Pacific Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) screening programme.
METHODS
METHODS
A two stage review was conducted. In Stage 1, data quality was assessed by comparing the PCP smoking data recorded close to AAA screening episodes with the data collected from participants at the AAA screening session. Inter-rater reliability was analysed using Cohen's kappa scores. In Stage 2, an audit of longitudinal smoking status was conducted, of a subset of participants potentially misclassified in Stage 1. Data were compared in three groups: current smoker (smoke at least monthly), ex-smoker (stopped > 1 month ago) and never smoker (smoked < 100 cigarettes in lifetime).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of the 1841 people who underwent AAA screening, 1716 (93%) had PCP smoking information. Stage 1 PCP smoking data showed 82% concordance with the AAA data (adjusted kappa 0.76). Fewer current or ex-smokers were recorded in PCP data. In the Stage 2 analysis of discordant and missing data (N = 313), 212 were enrolled in the 29 participating PCPs, and of these 13% were deceased and 41% had changed PCP. Of the 93 participants still enrolled in the participating PCPs, smoking status had been updated for 43%. Data on quantity, duration, or quit date of smoking were largely missing in PCP records. The AAA data of ex-smokers who were classified as never smokers in the Stage 2 PCP data (N = 27) showed a median smoking cessation duration of 32 years (range 0-50 years), with 85% (N = 23) having quit more than 15 years ago.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
PCP smoking data quality compared with the AAA data is consistent with international findings. PCP data captured fewer current and ex-smokers, suggesting ongoing improvement is important. Intervention programmes based on smoking status should consider complementary mechanisms to ensure eligible individuals are not missed from programme invitation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38840063
doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19021-8
pii: 10.1186/s12889-024-19021-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1513Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
US Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking — 50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). 2014. https://doi.org/NBK179276.
Ministry of Health. Longer, Healthier Lives: New Zealand’s Health 1990–2017. Wellington: 2020.
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. VizHub - GBD Compare 2019. https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/ (accessed March 12, 2024).
Ministry of Health. Annual Update of Key Results 2022/23. New Zealand Health Survey 2023. https://minhealthnz.shinyapps.io/nz-health-survey-2022-23-annual-data-explorer/ (accessed March 12, 2024).
Ministry of Health. Mortality web tool. New Zealand Mortality Collection 2021. https://minhealthnz.shinyapps.io/mortality-web-tool/ (accessed March 15, 2022).
Pylypchuk R, Wells S, Kerr A, Poppe K, Riddell T, Harwood M, et al. Cardiovascular disease risk prediction equations in 400 000 primary care patients in New Zealand: a derivation and validation study. Lancet. 2018;391:1897–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30664-0 .
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30664-0
pubmed: 29735391
Ministry of Health. Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment and Management for Primary Care 2018.
Tammemägi MC, Katki HA, Hocking WG, Church TR, Caporaso N, Kvale PA, et al. Selection criteria for lung-Cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:728–36. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1211776 .
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211776
pubmed: 23425165
pmcid: 3929969
Parker K, Colhoun S, Bartholomew K, Sandiford P, Lewis C, Milne D, et al. Invitation methods for Indigenous New Zealand Māori in lung cancer screening: protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE. 2023;18:e0281420. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0281420 .
doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0281420
pubmed: 37527237
pmcid: 10393155
Aune D, Schlesinger S, Norat T, Riboli E. Tobacco smoking and the risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Sci Rep. 2018;8:14786. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32100-2 .
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32100-2
pubmed: 30283044
pmcid: 6170425
Sandiford P, Grey C, Salvetto M, Hill A, Malloy T, Cranefield D, et al. The population prevalence of undetected abdominal aortic aneurysm in New Zealand Māori. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71:1215–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.07.055 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.07.055
pubmed: 31492616
Ministry of Health. The Integrated performance and incentive Framework (IPIF): a healthy start. Best Pract J 2015.
Ministry of Health. Enrollment with a general practice and primary health organisation 2022. https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/primary-health-care/about-primary-health-organisations/enrollment-general-practice-and-primary-health-organisation .
Ministry of Health. Indicator: Visited or talked to GP in past 12 months. New Zealand Health Survey 2021-22 2023. https://minhealthnz.shinyapps.io/nz-health-survey-2021-22-annual-data-explorer/_w_1eb7d253/#!/explore-indicators (accessed June 15, 2023).
Best Practice Advocacy Centre New Zealand. Smoking status and cessation support. BPJ 2011.
Selak V, Wells S, Whittaker R, Stewart A. Smoking status recording in GP electronic records: the unrealised potential. J Innov Health Inf. 2006;14:235–41. https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v14i4.635 .
doi: 10.14236/jhi.v14i4.635
Sinclair G, Kerr A. The bold Promise Project: a system change in primary care to support cardiovascular risk screening. N Z Med J. 2006;119:U2312.
pubmed: 17146487
Sheerin I, Hamilton G, Humphrey A, Scragg A. Issues in the assessment of cardiovascular risk in selected general practices in Canterbury, New Zealand. N Z Med J. 2007;120:U2714.
pubmed: 17853935
The Best Practice Advocacy Centre New Zealand. Smoking prevention and cessation in adolescents: changing futures, saving lives. Best Pract 2013:32–9.
Ministry of Health. Better Help for Smokers to Quit (Primary Care) 2021/22 Q4 - Final Results by DHBs (Unpublished) 2022.
Garies S, Cummings M, Quan H, McBrien K, Drummond N, Manca D, et al. Methods to improve the quality of smoking records in a primary care EMR database: exploring multiple imputation and pattern-matching algorithms. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2020;20:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12911-020-1068-5/TABLES/3 .
doi: 10.1186/S12911-020-1068-5/TABLES/3
Scheuermann TS, Richter KP, Rigotti NA, Cummins SE, Harrington KF, Sherman SE, et al. Accuracy of self-reported smoking abstinence in clinical trials of hospital-initiated smoking interventions. Addiction (Abingdon England). 2017;112:2227. https://doi.org/10.1111/ADD.13913 .
doi: 10.1111/ADD.13913
pubmed: 28834608
Shipton D, Tappin DM, Vadiveloo T, Crossley JA, Aitken DA, Chalmers J. Reliability of self reported smoking status by pregnant women for estimating smoking prevalence: a retrospective, cross sectional study. BMJ. 2009;339:1241. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.B4347 .
doi: 10.1136/BMJ.B4347
Djordjevic MV, Stellman SD, Zang E. Doses of nicotine and lung carcinogens delivered to cigarette smokers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:106–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/JNCI/92.2.106 .
doi: 10.1093/JNCI/92.2.106
pubmed: 10639511
Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The strengthening the reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Epidemiology. 2007;18:800–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577654 .
doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577654
Chiang N, Jain JK, Hulme KR, Vasudevan T. Epidemiology and outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysms in New Zealand: a 15-Year experience at a Regional Hospital. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018;46:274–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2017.07.006 .
doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.07.006
pubmed: 28739467
Nair N, Shaw C, Sarfati D, Stanley J. Abdominal aortic aneurysm disease in New Zealand: Epidemiology and burden between 2002 and 2006. N Z Med J 2012;125.
Sandiford P, Mosquera D, Bramley D. Ethnic inequalities in incidence, survival and mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm in New Zealand. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66:1097–103. https://doi.org/10.1136/JECH-2011-200754 .
doi: 10.1136/JECH-2011-200754
pubmed: 22766777
Rossaak JI, Sporle A, Birks CL, Van Rij AM. Abdominal aortic aneurysms in the New Zealand Maori population. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1361–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/BJS.4300 .
doi: 10.1002/BJS.4300
pubmed: 14598415
Ministry of Health. Recording smoking status 2023. https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/preventative-health-wellness/smokefree-2025/information-practitioners-patients-who-are-quitting-smoking/recording-smoking-status (accessed March 12, 2024).
Ministry of Health. Indicator Interpretation Guide 2015/16 New Zealand Health Survey. Wellington: 2016.
Health New Zealand. Identity standards 2023. https://www.tewhatuora.govt.nz/our-health-system/digital-health/data-and-digital-standards/approved-standards/identity-standards/ (accessed March 12, 2024).
Health New Zealand. Mortality Collection. Ministry of Health 2023. https://www.tewhatuora.govt.nz/our-health-system/data-and-statistics/nz-health-statistics/national-collections-and-surveys/collections/mortality-collection/ (accessed March 13, 2024).
Vears DF, Gillam L, Vears D. Inductive content analysis: A guide for beginning qualitative researchers 2022;23:2022. https://doi.org/10.3316/INFORMIT.455663644555599 .
Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968;70:213–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/H0026256 .
doi: 10.1037/H0026256
pubmed: 19673146
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of Observer Agreement for. Categorical Data. 1977;33:159–74.
LeLaurin JH, Gurka MJ, Chi X, Lee J-H, Hall J, Warren GW, et al. Concordance between Electronic Health Record and Tumor Registry Documentation of Smoking Status among patients with Cancer. JCO Clin Cancer Inf. 2021;518–26. https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI.20.00187 .
Noble N, Bryant J, Maher L, Jackman D, Bonevski B, Shakeshaft A, et al. Patient self-report versus medical records for smoking status and alcohol consumption at Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2021;45:277–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.13114 .
doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13114
pubmed: 33970509
Dickson JL, Hall H, Horst C, Tisi S, Verghese P, Worboys S, et al. Utilisation of primary care electronic patient records for identification and targeted invitation of individuals to a lung cancer screening programme. Lung Cancer. 2022;173:94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.09.009 .
doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.09.009
pubmed: 36179541
Mons U, Muezzinler A, Gellert C, Schottker B, Abnet CC, Bobak M, et al. Impact of smoking and smoking cessation on cardiovascular events and mortality among older adults: meta-analysis of individual participant data from prospective cohort studies of the CHANCES consortium. BMJ. 2015;350:h1551–1551. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1551 .
doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1551
pubmed: 25896935
pmcid: 4413837
Kent KC, Zwolak RM, Egorova NN, Riles TS, Manganaro A, Moskowitz AJ, et al. Analysis of risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a cohort of more than 3 million individuals. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:539–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.090 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.090
pubmed: 20630687
Remen T, Pintos J, Abrahamowicz M, Siemiatycki J. Risk of lung cancer in relation to various metrics of smoking history: a case-control study in Montreal. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:1275. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-5144-5 .
doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5144-5
pubmed: 30567516
pmcid: 6299933
Lee PN, Forey BA, Coombs KJ. Systematic review with meta-analysis of the epidemiological evidence in the 1900s relating smoking to lung cancer. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:385. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-12-385 .
doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-385
pubmed: 22943444
pmcid: 3505152
Tindle HA, Duncan MS, Greevy RA, Vasan RS, Kundu S, Massion PP et al. Lifetime Smoking History and Risk of Lung Cancer: Results From the Framingham Heart Study. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djy041 .
Reitsma M, Kendrick P, Anderson J, Arian N, Feldman R, Gakidou E, et al. Reexamining rates of decline in Lung Cancer Risk after Smoking Cessation. A Meta-analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020;17:1126–32. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201909-659OC .
doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201909-659OC
pubmed: 32603182
Tammemägi MC, Ruparel M, Tremblay A, Myers R, Mayo J, Yee J, et al. USPSTF2013 versus PLCOm2012 lung cancer screening eligibility criteria (International Lung Screening Trial): interim analysis of a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23:138–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00590-8 .
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00590-8
pubmed: 34902336
pmcid: 8716337
Marston L, Carpenter JR, Walters KR, Morris RW, Nazareth I, White IR, et al. Smoker, ex-smoker or non-smoker? The validity of routinely recorded smoking status in UK primary care: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e004958. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJOPEN-2014-004958 .
doi: 10.1136/BMJOPEN-2014-004958
pubmed: 24760355
pmcid: 4010810
Cole AM, Pflugeisen B, Schwartz MR, Miller SC. Cross sectional study to assess the accuracy of electronic health record data to identify patients in need of lung cancer screening. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3124-0 .
doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3124-0
pubmed: 29321038
pmcid: 5763525
Modin HE, Fathi JT, Gilbert CR, Wilshire CL, Wilson AK, Aye RW, et al. Pack-year cigarette smoking history for determination of Lung Cancer Screening eligibility. Comparison of the Electronic Medical Record versus a Shared decision-making conversation. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14:1320–5. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201612-984OC .
doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201612-984OC
pubmed: 28406708
Brown L, Agrawal U, Sullivan F. Using Electronic Medical Records to identify potentially eligible study subjects for Lung Cancer screening with biomarkers. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13. https://doi.org/10.3390/CANCERS13215449 .
Sharpe T, Alsahlanee A, Ward KD, Doyle F. Systematic review of clinician-reported barriers to Provision of Smoking Cessation interventions in Hospital Inpatient settings. J Smok Cessat. 2018;13:233–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/jsc.2017.25 .
doi: 10.1017/jsc.2017.25
Ministry of Health. The New Zealand Guidelines for Helping People to Stop Smoking Update. Wellington: 2021.
Gorber SC, Schofield-Hurwitz S, Hardt J, Levasseur G, Tremblay M. The accuracy of self-reported smoking: a systematic review of the relationship between self-reported and cotinine-assessed smoking status. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;11:12–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntn010 .
doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntn010
Fendrich M, Mackesy-Amiti ME, Johnson TP, Hubbell A, Wislar JS. Tobacco-reporting validity in an epidemiological drug-use survey. Addict Behav. 2005;30:175–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.04.009 .
doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.04.009
pubmed: 15561458
Pérez-Stable EJ, Marín BV, Marín G, Brody DJ, Benowitz NL. Apparent underreporting of cigarette consumption among Mexican American smokers. Am J Public Health. 1990;80:1057–61. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.80.9.1057 .
doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.9.1057
pubmed: 2382741
pmcid: 1404846
Ford RP, Tappin DM, Schluter PJ, Wild CJ. Smoking during pregnancy: how reliable are maternal self reports in New Zealand? J Epidemiol Community Health (1978). 1997;51(246–51). https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.51.3.246 .
Attebring MF, Herlitz J, Berndt AK, Karlsson T, Hjalmarson A. Are patients truthful about their smoking habits? A validation of self-report about smoking cessation with biochemical markers of smoking activity amongst patients with ischaemic heart disease. J Intern Med. 2001;249:145–51. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2796.2001.00770.x .
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2001.00770.x
Edwards R, Tu D, Stanley J, Martin G, Gifford H, Newcombe R. Smoking prevalence among doctors and nurses-2013 New Zealand census data. N Z Med J. 2018;131:48–57.
pubmed: 29518799
Duaso MJ, McDermott MS, Mujika A, Purssell E, While A. Do doctors’ smoking habits influence their smoking cessation practices? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2014;109:1811–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12680 .
doi: 10.1111/add.12680
pubmed: 25041084
Brinson D. How to increase the delivery of effective smoking cessation treatments in primary care settings: guidance for doctors, nurses, other health professionals and healthcare organisations 2009.
Pyper C, Amery J, Watson M, Crook C, Pyper C, Amery J, et al. Patients’ experiences when accessing their on-line electronic patient records in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2004;54:38.
pubmed: 14965405
pmcid: 1314776
Dullabh PM, Sondheimer NK, Katsh E, Evans MA. How patients can improve the Accuracy of their Medical records. EGEMs. 2014;2:10. https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1080 .
doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1080
Staroselsky M, Volk LA, Tsurikova R, Pizziferri L, Lippincott M, Wald J, et al. Improving electronic health record (EHR) accuracy and increasing compliance with health maintenance clinical guidelines through patient access and input. Int J Med Inf. 2006;75:693–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJMEDINF.2005.10.004 .
doi: 10.1016/J.IJMEDINF.2005.10.004
Polubriaginof F, Salmasian H, Albert DA, Vawdrey DK. Challenges with Collecting Smoking Status in Electronic Health Records. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017;2017:1392–400.
pubmed: 29854208
Goodley P, Balata H, Alonso A, Brockelsby C, Conroy M, Cooper-Moss N, et al. Invitation strategies and participation in a community-based lung cancer screening programme located in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation. Thorax. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1136/THORAX-2023-220001 .
doi: 10.1136/THORAX-2023-220001
pubmed: 37586744
Engela-Volker JS, Sr E, Augusto AP, Datta S, Ling Y, Mcclure L, et al. P163 preparing wales for lung cancer screening – updating GP record smoking data using an automated text message system. Thorax. 2021;76:A156–156. https://doi.org/10.1136/THORAX-2021-BTSABSTRACTS.272 .
doi: 10.1136/THORAX-2021-BTSABSTRACTS.272
Wilcox RG, Hughes J, Roland J. Verification of smoking history in patients after infarction using urinary nicotine and cotinine measurements. Br Med J. 1979;2:1026–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.6197.1026 .
doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6197.1026
pubmed: 519268
pmcid: 1596836
Kelley F, Charles S, Mcaughey J, Shepperd CJ. Methodologies for the quantitative estimation of toxicant dose to cigarette smokers using physical, chemical and bioanalytical data. Inhal Toxicol. 2013;25:383–97. https://doi.org/10.3109/08958378.2013.794177 .
doi: 10.3109/08958378.2013.794177
Wagenknecht LE, Burke GL, Perkins LL, Haley NJ, Friedman GD. Misclassification of smoking status in the CARDIA study: a comparison of self-report with serum cotinine levels. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:33. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.82.1.33 .
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.82.1.33
pubmed: 1536331
pmcid: 1694439
Caraballo RS, Giovino GA, Pechacek TF. Self-reported cigarette smoking vs. serum cotinine among U.S. adolescents. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200310001656821 .
doi: 10.1080/14622200310001656821
pubmed: 14982684
Avidano Britton GR, Brinthaupt JA, Stehle JM, James GD. Comparison of self-reported smoking and urinary cotinine levels in a rural pregnant Population. J Obstetric Gynecologic Neonatal Nurs. 2004;33:306–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884217504264866 .
doi: 10.1177/0884217504264866