Preventing New Gram-negative Resistance Through Beta-lactam De-escalation in Hospitalized Patients With Sepsis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

antibiotic de-escalation beta-lactam antibiotics resistance sepsis spectrum score

Journal

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
ISSN: 1537-6591
Titre abrégé: Clin Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9203213

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 07 03 2024
medline: 6 6 2024
pubmed: 6 6 2024
entrez: 6 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Whether antibiotic de-escalation reduces the risk of subsequent antibiotic resistance is uncertain. We sought to determine if beta-lactam (BL) antibiotic de-escalation is associated with decreased incidence of new Gram-negative resistance in hospitalized patients with sepsis. In a retrospective cohort study, patients with sepsis who were treated with at least 3 consecutive days of BL antibiotics, the first 2 days of which were with a broad-spectrum BL agent defined as a spectrum score (SS) of ≥7 were enrolled. Patients were grouped into three categories: (1) de-escalation of beta-lactam spectrum score (BLSS), (2) no change in BLSS, or (3) escalation of BLSS. The primary outcome was the isolation of a new drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria from a clinical culture within 60 days of cohort entry. Fine-Gray proportional hazards regression modeling while accounting for in-hospital death as a competing risk was performed. Six hundred forty-four patients of 7742 (8.3%) patients developed new gram-negative resistance. The mean time to resistance was 23.7 days yielding an incidence rate of 1.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.71-2.00) per 1000 patient-days. The lowest incidence rate was observed in the de-escalated group 1.42 (95% CI: 1.16-1.68) per 1000 patient-days. Statistically significant reductions in the development of new gram-negative resistance were associated with BL de-escalation compared to no-change (hazards ratio (HR) 0.59 [95% CI: .48-.73]). De-escalation was associated with a decreased risk of new resistance development compared to no change. This represents the largest study to date showing the utility of de-escalation in the prevention of antimicrobial resistance.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Whether antibiotic de-escalation reduces the risk of subsequent antibiotic resistance is uncertain. We sought to determine if beta-lactam (BL) antibiotic de-escalation is associated with decreased incidence of new Gram-negative resistance in hospitalized patients with sepsis.
METHODS METHODS
In a retrospective cohort study, patients with sepsis who were treated with at least 3 consecutive days of BL antibiotics, the first 2 days of which were with a broad-spectrum BL agent defined as a spectrum score (SS) of ≥7 were enrolled. Patients were grouped into three categories: (1) de-escalation of beta-lactam spectrum score (BLSS), (2) no change in BLSS, or (3) escalation of BLSS. The primary outcome was the isolation of a new drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria from a clinical culture within 60 days of cohort entry. Fine-Gray proportional hazards regression modeling while accounting for in-hospital death as a competing risk was performed.
FINDINGS RESULTS
Six hundred forty-four patients of 7742 (8.3%) patients developed new gram-negative resistance. The mean time to resistance was 23.7 days yielding an incidence rate of 1.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.71-2.00) per 1000 patient-days. The lowest incidence rate was observed in the de-escalated group 1.42 (95% CI: 1.16-1.68) per 1000 patient-days. Statistically significant reductions in the development of new gram-negative resistance were associated with BL de-escalation compared to no-change (hazards ratio (HR) 0.59 [95% CI: .48-.73]).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
De-escalation was associated with a decreased risk of new resistance development compared to no change. This represents the largest study to date showing the utility of de-escalation in the prevention of antimicrobial resistance.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38842541
pii: 7688896
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae253
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Potential conflicts of interest. M. H. K.’s efforts were supported by the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation. B. F. T.’s contribution occurred while he was working at the University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy in St. Louis; he is now an employee of Melinta Therapeutics. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

Auteurs

Besu F Teshome (BF)

Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Center for Health Outcomes Research and Education, University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Taehwan Park (T)

College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St. John's University, Queens, New York, USA.

Joel Arackal (J)

Center for Health Outcomes Research and Education, University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Nicholas Hampton (N)

Center for Clinical Excellence, BJC Healthcare, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Marin H Kollef (MH)

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Scott T Micek (ST)

Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Center for Health Outcomes Research and Education, University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Classifications MeSH