Differences in condom access and use and associated factors between persons with and without disabilities receiving social cash transfers in Luapula province, Zambia-A cross-sectional study.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 29 03 2021
accepted: 28 03 2024
medline: 6 6 2024
pubmed: 6 6 2024
entrez: 6 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Persons with disabilities are disadvantaged in accessing sexual and reproductive health services, including condoms. In this study, we investigated whether condom access and use and their associated factors differed between persons with and without disabilities. We used data from adults in households receiving the Government of Zambia social cash transfers (SCT) in four districts of Luapula province. Condom access and use was the outcome. Disability, defined by the Washington Group Short Set Questions on Disability, was the main predictor. We performed logistic regression analyses to determine the associations between condom access and use and disability. In multivariable analyses, we controlled for covariates including age, sex, marital status, poverty status, HIV testing, and receiving the SCT. The sample comprised 1,143 people aged 16-49, with a median age of 21 years (interquartile range 18-28); 57.4% (n = 656) were female, 86.5% (n = 989) accessed and used condoms, and 17.9% (n = 205) were disabled, rating themselves with a 3 or a 4 on a scale of 1 = "not limited" to 4 = "cannot at all" in performing any of the six daily functions (seeing, hearing, walking, cognition, self-care, or communicating). Nearly sixty percent(58.5% (n = 120)) of persons with disabilities were female, 79.5% (n = 163) reported being very poor, 87.8% (n = 180) reported receiving SCT, and 86.3% (n = 177) reported accessing and using condoms. Condom access and use did not differ between persons with and without disabilities (adjusted odds ratio: 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-1.98]). We found no differences between persons with and without disabilities in condom access and use. We established that individual-level factors such as age, sex, marital status, and knowledge of being HIV positive might play a more important role in condom access and use than disability. Condom promotion interventions should account for these factors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38843144
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302182
pii: PONE-D-21-10277
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0302182

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Chipanta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Auteurs

David Chipanta (D)

Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Janne Estill (J)

Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Heidi Stöckl (H)

Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.

Elona Toska (E)

Centre for Social Science Research, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Department of Sociology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Patrick Chanda (P)

Social Work and Sociology, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Jason Mwanza (J)

Social Work and Sociology, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Kelly Kaila (K)

Disability Inclusion Project Luapula, International Labour Organisation, Lusaka, Zambia.

Chisangu Matome (C)

Palm Associates Limited, Lusaka, Zambia.

Gelson Tembo (G)

Palm Associates Limited, Lusaka, Zambia.
Economics and Agricultural Sciences, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Olivia Keiser (O)

Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH