Automated Lugano Metabolic Response Assessment in


Journal

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
ISSN: 1527-7755
Titre abrégé: J Clin Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309333

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Jun 2024
Historique:
medline: 6 6 2024
pubmed: 6 6 2024
entrez: 6 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Artificial intelligence can reduce the time used by physicians on radiological assessments. For Here, we present a deep learning-based algorithm for fully automated treatment response assessments according to the Lugano 2014 classification. The proposed four-stage method, trained on a multicountry clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01287741) and tested in three independent multicenter and multicountry test sets on different non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes and different lines of treatment (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02257567, NCT02500407, 20% holdout in ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01287741), outputs the detected lesions at baseline and follow-up to enable focused radiologist review. The method's response assessment achieved high agreement with the adjudicated radiologic responses (eg, agreement for overall response assessment of 93%, 87%, and 85% in ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01287741, NCT02500407, and NCT02257567, respectively) similar to inter-radiologist agreement and was strongly prognostic of outcomes with a trend toward higher accuracy for death risk than adjudicated radiologic responses (hazard ratio for end of treatment by-model CMR of 0.123, 0.054, and 0.205 in ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01287741, NCT02500407, and NCT02257567, compared with, respectively, 0.226, 0.292, and 0.272 for CMR by the adjudicated responses). Furthermore, a radiologist review of the algorithm's assessments was conducted. The radiologist median review time was 1.38 minutes/assessment, and no statistically significant differences were observed in the level of agreement of the radiologist with the model's response compared with the level of agreement of the radiologist with the adjudicated responses. These results suggest that the proposed method can be incorporated into radiologic response assessment workflows in cancer imaging for significant time savings and with performance similar to trained medical experts.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38843483
doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01978
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02500407', 'NCT02257567', 'NCT01287741']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

JCO2301978

Auteurs

Skander Jemaa (S)

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA.

Souhila Ounadjela (S)

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA.

Xiaoyong Wang (X)

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA.

Tarec C El-Galaly (TC)

Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Hematology Research Unit, Department of Hematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Medicine Solna, Clinical Epidemiology Division, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Lale Kostakoglu (L)

Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.

Andrea Knapp (A)

F Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.

Grace Ku (G)

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA.

Lisa Musick (L)

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA.

Denis Sahin (D)

F Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.

Michael C Wei (MC)

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA.

Shen Yin (S)

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA.

Thomas Bengtsson (T)

Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA.

Alex De Crespigny (A)

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA.

Richard A D Carano (RAD)

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA.

Classifications MeSH