The impact of clinical genome sequencing in a global population with suspected rare genetic disease.
change of management
clinical genome testing
clinical utility
diagnostic equity
genetic testing
low- and middle-income
rare disease
rare genetic disease
whole-genome sequencing
Journal
American journal of human genetics
ISSN: 1537-6605
Titre abrégé: Am J Hum Genet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370475
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Jun 2024
03 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
27
11
2023
revised:
03
05
2024
accepted:
06
05
2024
medline:
7
6
2024
pubmed:
7
6
2024
entrez:
6
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
There is mounting evidence of the value of clinical genome sequencing (cGS) in individuals with suspected rare genetic disease (RGD), but cGS performance and impact on clinical care in a diverse population drawn from both high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has not been investigated. The iHope program, a philanthropic cGS initiative, established a network of 24 clinical sites in eight countries through which it provided cGS to individuals with signs or symptoms of an RGD and constrained access to molecular testing. A total of 1,004 individuals (median age, 6.5 years; 53.5% male) with diverse ancestral backgrounds (51.8% non-majority European) were assessed from June 2016 to September 2021. The diagnostic yield of cGS was 41.4% (416/1,004), with individuals from LMIC sites 1.7 times more likely to receive a positive test result compared to HIC sites (LMIC 56.5% [195/345] vs. HIC 33.5% [221/659], OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.9-3.4, p < 0.0001). A change in diagnostic evaluation occurred in 76.9% (514/668) of individuals. Change of management, inclusive of specialty referrals, imaging and testing, therapeutic interventions, and palliative care, was reported in 41.4% (285/694) of individuals, which increased to 69.2% (480/694) when genetic counseling and avoidance of additional testing were also included. Individuals from LMIC sites were as likely as their HIC counterparts to experience a change in diagnostic evaluation (OR 6.1, 95% CI 1.1-∞, p = 0.05) and change of management (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.5-1.3, p = 0.49). Increased access to genomic testing may support diagnostic equity and the reduction of global health care disparities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38843839
pii: S0002-9297(24)00169-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.05.006
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests E.T., E.C., K.R., J. Button, A.M., M.B., J.A., A.W., M.A., T.K., A.C., S.S.A., D.L.P., and R.J.T. were employees of and stockholders in Illumina, Inc. at the time of this investigation. V.R. is a stockholder in Illumina, Inc. J.O. is a stockholder in Illumina, Inc. and employee of C2N Diagnostics. J. Belmont and T.W. are stockholders in Illumina, Inc. and were compensated as research advisors through Genetics & Genomics Services Inc. C.S. was compensated as a consultant through Genetics & Genomics Services Inc. for statistical analysis. K.M. is an employee of Ambry Genetics.