Should we, and how to, optimize cefiderocol administration during severe nosocomial pneumonia due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanii? A viewpoint.

Acinetobacter baumannii carbapenem-resistant cefiderocol pharmacokinetics pneumonia susceptibility

Journal

Journal of global antimicrobial resistance
ISSN: 2213-7173
Titre abrégé: J Glob Antimicrob Resist
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101622459

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 25 10 2023
revised: 02 03 2024
accepted: 20 05 2024
medline: 7 6 2024
pubmed: 7 6 2024
entrez: 6 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Acinetobacter baumannii is classified by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as an "urgent threat" due to its ability to acquire and develop resistance to multiple classes of antibiotics. As a result, it is one of the most concerning pathogens in healthcare settings, with increasing incidence of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Therefore, there are ongoing efforts to find novel treatment options, one of which is cefiderocol. We aim to review available evidence on cefiderocol use for severe nosocomial pneumonia due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii METHODS: A comprehensive review was conducted from 2017 to 2023, covering articles from databases such as Pubmed, Scopus, and Embase, along with conference proceedings from ECCMID 2023. The primary focus was on severe nosocomial pneumonia due A. baumannii and cefiderocol. Cefiderocol, targeting periplasmic space Penicillin-Binding Proteins (PBPs) via siderophore transport pathways, exhibits promise against multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacilli. Its effectiveness in treating CRAB pneumonia remains debated. The CREDIBLE trial reported higher mortality with cefiderocol compared to the best available treatment, while other cohort studies showed contrasting outcomes. Patient variations and pharmacokinetic factors may underlie these discrepancies. The recommended cefiderocol dosage regimen may fall short of desired pharmacokinetic targets, especially in critically ill patients and lung infections. Pulmonary factors hindering cefiderocol's entry into bacteria through iron transporters are overlooked in clinical breakpoints. Optimized dosing or combination regimens may enhance infection site exposure and outcomes. Further research is needed to determine the optimal cefiderocol dosage and administration (mono vs. dual therapy, continuous vs. intermittent infusion), in severe Acinetobacter baumannii nosocomial pneumonia.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38844258
pii: S2213-7165(24)00102-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2024.05.014
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Letter

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interests The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Julien Massol (J)

Infectious disease department, Raymond-Poincaré University Hospital, AP-HP Paris Saclay, Garches, France. Electronic address: julien.massol@aphp.fr.

Aurélien Dinh (A)

Infectious disease department, Raymond-Poincaré University Hospital, AP-HP Paris Saclay, Garches, France.

Katy Jeannot (K)

Bacteriology department, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.

Clara Duran (C)

Infectious disease department, Raymond-Poincaré University Hospital, AP-HP Paris Saclay, Garches, France.

Frédérique Bouchand (F)

Pharmacy, Raymond-Poincaré University Hospital, AP-HP Paris Saclay, Garches, France.

Anaïs Potron (A)

Bacteriology department, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.

Laurent Dortet (L)

Microbiology department, University Hospital of Bicêtre, AP-HP Paris Saclay, Kremlin Bicêtre, France.

François Jehl (F)

Microbiology department, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Classifications MeSH