Immune responses and protective efficacy of a trivalent combination DNA vaccine based on oprL, oprF and flgE genes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

SI value cytokine concentration poprL+poprF+pflgE protection rate serum antibody

Journal

Veterinarni medicina
ISSN: 0375-8427
Titre abrégé: Vet Med (Praha)
Pays: Czech Republic
ID NLM: 0063417

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Historique:
received: 24 06 2021
accepted: 29 09 2022
medline: 10 11 2022
pubmed: 10 11 2022
entrez: 7 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an infectious pathogenic bacteria infecting many different species of animals. Currently, it lacks a commercial vaccine. In this study, three monovalent DNA vaccines (poprL, poprF, and pflgE), three bivalent combination DNA vaccines (poprL+poprF, poprL+pflgE, poprF+pflgE), and a trivalent DNA vaccine (poprL+poprF+pflgE) were constructed. Consequently, we immunised chickens with these DNA vaccines and used inactivated vaccines as the positive controls. Then, the immune efficacy was evaluated through serum antibody detection, a lymphocyte proliferation assay, and cytokine concentration determination. Lastly, we assessed the protection rate through a challenge experiment. Following vaccination, the serum antibody levels induced using these DNA vaccines were different due to the different coating antigens. In the trivalent combination DNA vaccine group, we established that the lymphocyte proliferation (SI values), IFN-γ, IL-2, and IL-4 levels were significantly higher than those of the other six DNA vaccine groups and the inactivated vaccine group. However, the protection provided was slightly lower than that of the inactivated vaccine and higher than those of other DNA vaccines. The protection rate of poprL, poprF, pflgE, poprL+poprF, poprL+pflgE, poprF+pflgE, poprL+poprF+pflgE, and the inactivated vaccine were 50, 45, 60, 75, 80, 80, 90, and 95%, respectively. The results of this study indicated the trivalent DNA vaccine based on 

Identifiants

pubmed: 38845784
doi: 10.17221/86/2021-VETMED
pii: 121086
pmc: PMC11154874
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

611-619

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Gong et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Qiang Gong (Q)

Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, P.R. China.

Yajing Li (Y)

Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, P.R. China.

Wenhan Zhai (W)

Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, P.R. China.

Mingfu Niu (M)

Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, P.R. China.

Classifications MeSH