Community and Healthcare Perspectives on Implementing Hypertension Interventions for a Multiethnic Safety-Net Population.


Journal

Ethnicity & disease
ISSN: 1945-0826
Titre abrégé: Ethn Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9109034

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Historique:
pmc-release: 24 10 2024
medline: 7 6 2024
pubmed: 7 6 2024
entrez: 7 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To synthesize community and healthcare informants' perspectives on contextual considerations and tailoring recommendations for high-quality, sustainable implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for managing hypertension (HTN) in a multiethnic safety-net population. Structured focus-group discussions and semistructured qualitative interviews. High-quality, sustainable implementation of HTN-related EBPs can promote equitable care. Implementation challenges extend beyond individual patients to span multiple levels of context. Few studies have systematically engaged community and healthcare perspectives to inform the design of HTN intervention trials. A large safety-net healthcare system. We conducted four structured discussions with each of five race- or ethnicity-specific community action boards (CABs) to understand community members' HTN-related norms, assets, needs, and experiences across local healthcare systems. We interviewed 41 personnel with diverse roles in our partnered healthcare system to understand the system's HTN-related strengths and needs. We solicited EBP tailoring recommendations from both groups. We summarized the findings using rapid content analysis. Participants identified contextual considerations spanning seven themes: social determinants, healthcare engagement, clinical interaction, system operations, standardization, patient education, and partnerships and funding. They offered tailoring recommendations spanning nine themes: addressing complex contexts, addressing social needs, system operations, healthcare system training and resources, linguistic and cultural tailoring, behavioral engagement, relational engagement, illness-course engagement, and community partnerships. Engaging community and healthcare informants can ground implementation in the policy, community, healthcare system, clinical, and interpersonal contexts surrounding diverse patients at risk for disparities. Such grounding can reframe inequitable implementation as a multilevel social problem facing communities and healthcare systems, rather than individuals.

Sections du résumé

Objective UNASSIGNED
To synthesize community and healthcare informants' perspectives on contextual considerations and tailoring recommendations for high-quality, sustainable implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for managing hypertension (HTN) in a multiethnic safety-net population.
Design UNASSIGNED
Structured focus-group discussions and semistructured qualitative interviews.
Background UNASSIGNED
High-quality, sustainable implementation of HTN-related EBPs can promote equitable care. Implementation challenges extend beyond individual patients to span multiple levels of context. Few studies have systematically engaged community and healthcare perspectives to inform the design of HTN intervention trials.
Setting UNASSIGNED
A large safety-net healthcare system.
Participants/Methods UNASSIGNED
We conducted four structured discussions with each of five race- or ethnicity-specific community action boards (CABs) to understand community members' HTN-related norms, assets, needs, and experiences across local healthcare systems. We interviewed 41 personnel with diverse roles in our partnered healthcare system to understand the system's HTN-related strengths and needs. We solicited EBP tailoring recommendations from both groups. We summarized the findings using rapid content analysis.
Results UNASSIGNED
Participants identified contextual considerations spanning seven themes: social determinants, healthcare engagement, clinical interaction, system operations, standardization, patient education, and partnerships and funding. They offered tailoring recommendations spanning nine themes: addressing complex contexts, addressing social needs, system operations, healthcare system training and resources, linguistic and cultural tailoring, behavioral engagement, relational engagement, illness-course engagement, and community partnerships.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Engaging community and healthcare informants can ground implementation in the policy, community, healthcare system, clinical, and interpersonal contexts surrounding diverse patients at risk for disparities. Such grounding can reframe inequitable implementation as a multilevel social problem facing communities and healthcare systems, rather than individuals.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38846736
doi: 10.18865/ed.DECIPHeR.68
pmc: PMC11099525
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

68-80

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of Interest: Sandesara, Wali, Park, and Brown: Receive salary support from the partnered healthcare system for this study.

Auteurs

Utpal N Sandesara (UN)

Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.

Savanna L Carson (SL)

Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.

Alex Dopp (A)

Department of Behavioral and Policy Sciences, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.

Lilian G Perez (LG)

Department of Behavioral and Policy Sciences, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.

Atkia Sadia (A)

Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.

Soma Wali (S)

Department of Medicine, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, CA.

Nina J Park (NJ)

Department of Population Health Management, Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles, CA.

Alejandra Casillas (A)

Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.

Gloria Kim (G)

Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.

Maria G Morales (MG)

Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.

Ejiro Ntekume (E)

Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.

Sarah Song (S)

Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.

Priya Gandhi (P)

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.

Tony Wafford (T)

I Choose Life Health and Wellness Center, Inglewood, CA.

Arleen F Brown (AF)

Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH