Clinicopathological study of adrenal pheochromocytoma and extra-adrenal paragangliomas with reference to GAPP and PASS scoring systems.


Journal

Indian journal of pathology & microbiology
ISSN: 0974-5130
Titre abrégé: Indian J Pathol Microbiol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 7605904

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 21 10 2023
accepted: 26 03 2024
medline: 7 6 2024
pubmed: 7 6 2024
entrez: 7 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The presence of distant metastasis is known to drastically reduce survival of adrenal pheochromocytoma (PH) and extra-adrenal paraganglioma (PGL). Therefore, predicting malignant potential has an immense impact on prognosis. Pheochtomocytoma of adrenal gland scaled score (PASS) and the grading of adrenal pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (GAPP) score are two histological algorithms used to predict metastatic potential, but neither has been regarded as 'gold-standard'. Both these scoring systems are yet to be validated. Here, we tried to validate the association of GAPP/PASS scores with disease outcome and strength of association between individual GAPP/PASS parameters with prognosis. This was a prospective study comprising 22 pheochromocytomas and eight paragangliomas. GAPP score was calculated in paraganglioma cases, and both GAPP/PASS scores were calculated for pheochromocytomas. Disease outcome was then tallied with risk stratification of the GAPP/PASS scoring system. Succinate dehydrogenase B (SDHB) immunohistochemistry was done in 15 cases to see its impact on prognosis. The common PASS parameters associated with malignancy were 'high cellularity', 'tumor cell spindling' and 'extension into adipose tissue'. PASS score showed high sensitivity and negative predictive value but low specificity and positive predictive value. Similarly, GAPP score also showed high sensitivity and negative predictive value but low specificity and positive predictive value. In our study, GAPP/PASS scores successfully segregated tumor with low malignant potential from tumor with higher risk of metastasis, although specificity of GAPP was more than PASS. We also found that addition of objective parameters like SDHB immunohistochemistry may further increase the specificity of the existing scoring system.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The presence of distant metastasis is known to drastically reduce survival of adrenal pheochromocytoma (PH) and extra-adrenal paraganglioma (PGL). Therefore, predicting malignant potential has an immense impact on prognosis. Pheochtomocytoma of adrenal gland scaled score (PASS) and the grading of adrenal pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (GAPP) score are two histological algorithms used to predict metastatic potential, but neither has been regarded as 'gold-standard'. Both these scoring systems are yet to be validated. Here, we tried to validate the association of GAPP/PASS scores with disease outcome and strength of association between individual GAPP/PASS parameters with prognosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
This was a prospective study comprising 22 pheochromocytomas and eight paragangliomas. GAPP score was calculated in paraganglioma cases, and both GAPP/PASS scores were calculated for pheochromocytomas. Disease outcome was then tallied with risk stratification of the GAPP/PASS scoring system. Succinate dehydrogenase B (SDHB) immunohistochemistry was done in 15 cases to see its impact on prognosis.
RESULTS RESULTS
The common PASS parameters associated with malignancy were 'high cellularity', 'tumor cell spindling' and 'extension into adipose tissue'. PASS score showed high sensitivity and negative predictive value but low specificity and positive predictive value. Similarly, GAPP score also showed high sensitivity and negative predictive value but low specificity and positive predictive value.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
In our study, GAPP/PASS scores successfully segregated tumor with low malignant potential from tumor with higher risk of metastasis, although specificity of GAPP was more than PASS. We also found that addition of objective parameters like SDHB immunohistochemistry may further increase the specificity of the existing scoring system.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38847206
doi: 10.4103/ijpm.ijpm_859_23
pii: 00004270-990000000-00205
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology.

Auteurs

Akash Mondal (A)

Department of Pathology, IPGME&R, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Moumita Sengupta (M)

Department of Pathology, IPGME&R, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Soumya Dey (S)

Department of Pathology, IPGME&R, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Anish Kar (A)

Department of Endocrinology, IPGME&R, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Krishnendu Maiti (K)

Department of Urology, IPGME&R, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Debansu Sarkar (D)

Department of Urology, IPGME&R, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Uttara Chatterjee (U)

Department of Pathology, IPGME&R, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Classifications MeSH