Does double distal locking reduce non-union rates in intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fracture?

Humeral shaft fracture distal locking intramedullary nailing non-union

Journal

Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR
ISSN: 1877-0568
Titre abrégé: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101494830

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 17 05 2023
revised: 15 03 2024
accepted: 21 03 2024
medline: 8 6 2024
pubmed: 8 6 2024
entrez: 7 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Intramedullary nailing is one of the surgical treatments for humeral shaft fracture. Non-union is a common complication, with rates of 10-20%. The objective of this study was to compare non-union in humeral shaft fractures treated by intramedullary nailing with double distal locking, single distal locking or no locking. Nailing with double distal locking decreases non-union rates compared to single or no locking. This single-center retrospective comparative study included 87 patients with closed humeral shaft fracture without neurologic deficit treated by anterograde intramedullary nailing: group 1 (double locking): 15 fractures; group 2 (single locking): 63 fractures; group 3 (no locking): 9 fractures. Non-union was defined as absence of radiographic callus at 6 months without clinical pain. The primary endpoint was non-union rate per group. The secondary endpoints were Constant score at 6 months, and postoperative use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). There were no significant differences in non-union rate: 20.0% in group 1, 20.3% in group 2, and 0% in group 3 (p = 0.32). Constant score at 6 months was significantly different between the 3 groups (p = 0.01). Group 2 used more NSAIDs than the other groups (39.1% vs 20.0% in group 1 and 33.3% in group 3; p = 0.37). Non-union rates were similar regardless of distal locking for closed humeral shaft fractures without neurologic deficit treated by intramedullary nailing. Nevertheless, patients in the double locking group had higher Constant scores at 6 months, probably related to greater stability of fixation, allowing more efficient rehabilitation. III; Retrospective comparative study.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38848890
pii: S1877-0568(24)00160-9
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103913
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103913

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Jules Levasseur (J)

Département de Chirurgie Osseuse, CHU-Angers, 4 Rue Larrey, 49933 Angers Cedex 9, France.

Pierre Bordure (P)

Service de Chirurgie de l'Epaule, Clinique Saint-Léonard, 18 Rue de Bellinière, 49800 Trélazé, France.

Yvon Moui (Y)

Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Centre Hospitalier du Mans, 194 Avenue Rubillard, 72037 Le Mans, France.

Guillaume David (G)

Département de Chirurgie Osseuse, CHU-Angers, 4 Rue Larrey, 49933 Angers Cedex 9, France.

Louis Rony (L)

Département de Chirurgie Osseuse, CHU-Angers, 4 Rue Larrey, 49933 Angers Cedex 9, France. Electronic address: Louis.rony@chu-angers.fr.

Classifications MeSH