Biomechanics of sound production in high-pitched classical singing.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Jun 2024
07 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
01
08
2023
accepted:
20
05
2024
medline:
8
6
2024
pubmed:
8
6
2024
entrez:
7
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Voice production of humans and most mammals is governed by the MyoElastic-AeroDynamic (MEAD) principle, where an air stream is modulated by self-sustained vocal fold oscillation to generate audible air pressure fluctuations. An alternative mechanism is found in ultrasonic vocalizations of rodents, which are established by an aeroacoustic (AA) phenomenon without vibration of laryngeal tissue. Previously, some authors argued that high-pitched human vocalization is also produced by the AA principle. Here, we investigate the so-called "whistle register" voice production in nine professional female operatic sopranos singing a scale from C6 (≈ 1047 Hz) to G6 (≈ 1568 Hz). Super-high-speed videolaryngoscopy revealed vocal fold collision in all participants, with closed quotients from 30 to 73%. Computational modeling showed that the biomechanical requirements to produce such high-pitched voice would be an increased contraction of the cricothyroid muscle, vocal fold strain of about 50%, and high subglottal pressure. Our data suggest that high-pitched operatic soprano singing uses the MEAD mechanism. Consequently, the commonly used term "whistle register" does not reflect the physical principle of a whistle with regard to voice generation in high pitched classical singing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38849382
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62598-8
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-62598-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13132Subventions
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : Ec409/1-1
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : 1 R01 DC 018280 - 05
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Baken, R. J. & Orlikoff, R. F. Clinical Measurement of Speech and Voice. (Singular Thomson Learning, 2000).
Herbst, C. T. The snake pit of voice pedagogy part I: Proprioception, perception, and laryngeal mechanisms. J. Sing. 77, 173–188 (2020).
Echternach, M. Vocal registers. In European Manual of Medicine (eds Zehnhoff-Dinnesen, A. et al.) (Springer Verlag, 2020).
Walker, J. S. An investigation of the whistle register in the female voice. J. Voice 2, 140–150 (1988).
doi: 10.1016/S0892-1997(88)80070-5
Miller, D. G. & Schutte, H. K. Physical definition of the ‘flageolet register’. J. Voice 7, 206–212 (1993).
pubmed: 8353637
doi: 10.1016/S0892-1997(05)80328-5
Keilmann, A. & Michek, F. Physiologie und akustische Analysen der Pfeifstimme der Frau. Folia Phoniatr. Et Logop 45, 247–255 (1993).
doi: 10.1159/000266269
Kiesgen, P. Voice Pedagogy: Registration. J. Sing 62, 537–539 (2006).
Garnier, M. et al. Glottal behavior in the high soprano range and the transition to the whistle register. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 951–962 (2012).
pubmed: 22280718
doi: 10.1121/1.3664008
Titze, I. Principles of voice production (Prentice Hall, 1994).
Henrich, N. Mirroring the voice from Garcia to the present day: Some insights into singing voice registers. Logop. Phoniatr. Vocology 31, 3–14 (2006).
doi: 10.1080/14015430500344844
Herbst, C. T. 2021 Registers—The snake pit of voice pedagogy. Part 2: mixed voice, vocal tract influences, Individual Teaching Systems. J. Sing 77, 345 (2021).
Van den Berg, J. Myoelastic-aerodynamic theory of voice production. J. Speech Hear. Res. 1, 227–244 (1958).
pubmed: 13576514
doi: 10.1044/jshr.0103.227
Herbst, C. T., Elemans, C. P. H., Tokuda, I. T., Chatziioannou, V. & Švec, J. G. Dynamic system coupling in voice production. J. Voice https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVOICE.2022.10.004 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/J.JVOICE.2022.10.004
pubmed: 37080891
Titze, I. R. The Myoelastic Aerodynamic Theory of Phonation. (The National Center for Voice and Speech, 2006).
Švec, J. G., Schutte, H. K., Chen, C. J. & Titze, I. R. integrative insights into the Myoelastic-Aerodynamic theory and acoustics of phonation. Scientific tribute to Donald G. Miller. J. Voice 37, 305–313 (2023).
pubmed: 33744068
doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.01.023
Schoder, S. et al. Aeroacoustic sound source characterization of the human voice production—Perturbed convective wave equation. Appl. Sci. 11, 2614 (2021).
doi: 10.3390/app11062614
Fant, G. Glottal source and excitation analysis. STL-QPSR 1, 85–107 (1979).
Roberts, L. H. The rodent ultrasound production mechanism. Ultrasonics 13, 83–88 (1975).
pubmed: 1167711
doi: 10.1016/0041-624X(75)90052-9
Mahrt, E., Agarwal, A., Perkel, D., Portfors, C. & Elemans, C. P. H. Mice produce ultrasonic vocalizations by intra-laryngeal planar impinging jets. Curr. Biol. 26, R880–R881 (2016).
pubmed: 27728788
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.032
Håkansson, J. et al. Aerodynamics and motor control of ultrasonic vocalizations for social communication in mice and rats. BMC Biol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01185-z (2022).
doi: 10.1186/s12915-021-01185-z
pubmed: 34996429
pmcid: 8742360
Riede, T., Borgard, H. L. & Pasch, B. Laryngeal airway reconstruction indicates that rodent ultrasonic vocalizations are produced by an edge-tone mechanism. R Soc. Open Sci. 4, 170976 (2017).
pubmed: 29291091
pmcid: 5717665
doi: 10.1098/rsos.170976
Klatt, D. & Klatt, L. Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87(2), 820–857. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.398894 (1990).
doi: 10.1121/1.398894
pubmed: 2137837
Harrison, D. F. N. The anatomy and physiology of the mammalian larynx (Cambridge University Press, 1995).
doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511525766
Schultz, P. Über einen Fall von willkürlichem laryngealen Pfeifen beim Menschen. Arch f. Physiol., Arch f. Physiol. Suppl. 523, (1902).
Berry, D. A., Herzel, H., Titze, I. R. & Story, B. H. Bifurcations in excised larynx experiments. J. Voice 10, 129–138 (1996).
pubmed: 8734387
doi: 10.1016/S0892-1997(96)80039-7
Tsai, C. G., Shau, Y. W., Liu, H. M. & Hsiao, T. Y. Laryngeal mechanisms during human 4-kHz vocalization studied with CT videostroboscopy and color Doppler imaging. J. Voice 22(3), 275–82 (2008).
pubmed: 17509826
doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.10.007
Edgerton, M. The extra-normal voice. In The Oxford Handbook of Singing (eds Howard, D. M. et al.) 729–750 (Oxford University Press, 2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199660773.013.007 .
doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199660773.013.007
Corcia, A. D. & Fussi, F. Whistle register and M3: A preliminary HSDI investigation by visualization and acoustics in male and female singers. In Normal and abnormal vocal folds kinematics: high speed digital phonoscopy (HSDP), optical coherence tomography (OCT) & narrow imaging (ed. Izdebski, K.) 267–272 (CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2016).
Herzel, H. & Reuter, R. Whistle register and biphonation in a child’s voice. Folia Phoniatr Logop 49, 216–224 (1997).
pubmed: 9311156
doi: 10.1159/000266458
Döllinger, M., Berry, D. A., Luegmair, G., Hüttner, B. & Bohr, C. Effects of the Epilarynx area on vocal fold dynamics and the primary voice signal. J. Voice 26, 285–292 (2012).
pubmed: 21708451
doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.04.009
Edgerton, M. E. et al. Pitch profile of the glottal whistle (M4). Malays. J. Sci. 32, 78–85 (2013).
doi: 10.22452/mjs.vol32no1.13
Švec, J. G., Sundberg, J. & Hertegård, S. Three registers in an untrained female singer analyzed by videokymography, strobolaryngoscopy and sound spectrography. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 347–353 (2008).
pubmed: 18177164
doi: 10.1121/1.2804939
Echternach, M., Döllinger, M., Sundberg, J., Traser, L. & Richter, B. Vocal fold vibrations at high soprano fundamental frequencies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133, EL82–EL87 (2013).
pubmed: 23363198
doi: 10.1121/1.4773200
Izdebski, K., Di Lorenzo, E., Yan, Y. & Blanco, M. What we have learned about ingressive phonation and whistle voice production from HSDP. In Normal and Abnormal Vocal Folds Kinematics: High Speed Digital Phonoscopy (HSDP), Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) & Narrow Imaging 301–306 (ephonoscope, 2016).
Sakakibara, K.-I. Production mechanism of voice quality in singing. J. Phon. Soc. Jpn. 7, 27–39 (2003).
Lã, F. M. B., Sundberg, J. & Granqvist, S. Augmented visual-feedback of airflow: Immediate effects on voice-source characteristics of students of singing. Psychol. Music 50, 933–944 (2022).
doi: 10.1177/03057356211026735
Miller, D. G. Registers in Singing. Empirical and Systematic Studies in the Theory of the Singing Voice. Doctoral Dissertation (University, 2000).
Childers, D. G., Naik, J. M., Larar, J. N., Krishnamurthy, A. K. & Moore, G. P. Electroglottography, speech, and ultra-high speed cinematography. In Vocal Fold Physiology and Biophysics of Voice 202–220 (eds Titze, I. R. & Scherer, R.) (Denver Center of Performing Arts, 1983).
Lohscheller, J., Švec, J. G. & Döllinger, M. Vocal fold vibration amplitude, open quotient, speed quotient and their variability along glottal length: kymographic data from normal subjects. Logoped. Phoniatr. Vocol. 38, 182–192 (2013).
pubmed: 23173880
doi: 10.3109/14015439.2012.731083
Brudzynski, S. M., Kehoe, P. & Callahan, M. Sonographic structure of isolation-induced ultrasonic calls of rat pups. Dev Psychobiol 34(3), 195–204 (1999).
pubmed: 10204095
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2302(199904)34:3<195::AID-DEV4>3.0.CO;2-S
Shadle, C. Experiments on the acoustics of whistling. Phys. Teach. 21(3), 148–154 (1983).
doi: 10.1119/1.2341241
Titze, I., Riede, T. & Mau, T. Predicting achievable fundamental frequency ranges in vocalization across species. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12(6), e1004907 (2016).
pubmed: 27309543
pmcid: 4911068
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004907
Henrich, N., d’Alessandro, C., Doval, B. & Castellengo, M. Glottal open quotient in singing: Measurements and correlation with laryngeal mechanisms, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117(3), 1417–1430 (2005).
pubmed: 15807029
doi: 10.1121/1.1850031
Herbst, C. T., Schutte, H. K., Bowling, D. L. & Svec, J. G. Comparing chalk with cheese—The EGG contact quotient is only a limited surrogate of the closed quotient. J. Voice 31(4), 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.11.007 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.11.007
pubmed: 28017461
Echternach, M. et al. Laryngeal evidence for the first and second passaggio in professionally trained sopranos. PLoS One 12(5), e0175865 (2017).
pubmed: 28467509
pmcid: 5414960
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175865
Kato, H., Lee, Y., Wakamiya, K., Nakagawa, T. & Kaburagi, T. Vocal fold vibration of the whistle register observed by high-speed digital imaging. J. Voice https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.08.026 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.08.026
pubmed: 37806902
Titze, I. R. A hypothesis about whistle voice. J. Sing. 64, 473–475 (2008).
Garnier, M., Henrich, N., Smith, J. & Wolfe, J. Vocal tract adjustments in the high soprano range. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127, 3771–3780 (2010).
pubmed: 20550275
doi: 10.1121/1.3419907
Echternach, M. et al. Articulation and vocal tract acoustics at soprano subject’s high fundamental frequencies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 137, 2586–2595 (2015).
pubmed: 25994691
doi: 10.1121/1.4919356
Köberlein, M. et al. Investigation of resonance strategies of high pitch singing sopranos using dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 150, 4191–4202 (2021).
pubmed: 34972262
doi: 10.1121/10.0008903
Pressman, J. J. & Kelemen, G. Physiology of the larynx. Physiol. Rev. 35, 506–554 (1955).
pubmed: 13245423
doi: 10.1152/physrev.1955.35.3.506
Van den Berg, J. Vocal ligaments versus registers. The NATS Bulletin 16–31 (1963).
Titze, I. R. & Hunter, E. J. Normal vibration frequencies of the vocal ligament. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 2264–2269 (2004).
pubmed: 15139637
doi: 10.1121/1.1698832
Thurman, L., Welch, G. F., Theimer, A. & Klitzke, C. Addressing Vocal Register Discrepancies: An Alternative, Science-Based Theory Of Register Phenomena. in Second International Conference The Physiology and Acoustics of Singing (PAS2) 64 (National Center for Voice and Speech, 2004).
Baken, R. J. & Isshiki, N. Arytenoid displacement by simulated intrinsic muscle contraction. Folia Phoniatr (Basel) 29, 206–216 (1977).
pubmed: 924310
doi: 10.1159/000264090
Edgerton, M. E. The 21st-century voice : Contemporary and traditional extra-normal voice (Scarecrow Press, 2015).
Bunch, M. & Chapman, J. Taxonomy of singers used as subjects in scientific research. J. Voice 14, 363–369 (2000).
pubmed: 11021503
doi: 10.1016/S0892-1997(00)80081-8
Joliveau, E., Smith, J. & Wolfe, J. Tuning of vocal tract resonance by sopranos. Nature 427(6970), 116–116 (2004).
pubmed: 14712266
doi: 10.1038/427116a
Echternach, M. et al. The influence of vowels on vocal fold dynamics in the tenor’s passaggio. J. Voice 31(4), 424–429 (2017).
pubmed: 28040341
doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.11.010
Echternach, M., Döllinger, M., Köberlein, M., Kuranova, L. & Kainz, M. A. Influence of loudness on vocal stability in the male Passaggio. J. Voice 37(2), 296.e1-296.e8 (2021).
pubmed: 33455852
doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.12.044
Echternach, M. et al. Are source-filter interactions detectable in classical singing during vowel glides?. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 149(6), 4565 (2021).
pubmed: 34241428
doi: 10.1121/10.0005432
Inwald, E. C., Döllinger, M., Schuster, M., Eysholdt, U. & Bohr, C. Multiparametric analysis of vocal fold vibrations in healthy and disordered voices in high-speed imaging. J. Voice 25, 576–590 (2011).
pubmed: 20728308
doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.04.004
Lohscheller, J. & Eysholdt, U. Phonovibrogram visualization of entire vocal fold dynamics. Laryngoscope 118, 753–758 (2008).
pubmed: 18216742
doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e318161f9e1
Karakozoglou, S.-Z., Henrich, N., d’Alessandro, C. & Stylianou, Y. Automatic glottal segmentation using local-based active contours and application to glottovibrography. Speech Commun. 54, 641–654 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2011.07.010
Schäffner, F. D. Signalerfassung und Analyse medizinischer Daten: Entwicklung einer Analysesoftware für medizinische Messdaten innerhalb der Stimmforschung (University Erlangen, 2015).
Sundberg, J., Andersson, M. & Hultqvist, C. Effects of subglottal pressure variation on professional baritone singers’ voice sources. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105(3), 1965–1971 (1999).
pubmed: 10089615
doi: 10.1121/1.426731
Titze, I. R. The physics of small-amplitude oscillation of the vocal folds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 1536–1552 (1988).
pubmed: 3372869
doi: 10.1121/1.395910
Titze, I. R. Bi-stable vocal fold adduction: A mechanism of modal-falsetto register shifts and mixed registration. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 135, 2091–2101 (2014).
pubmed: 25235006
pmcid: 4167751
doi: 10.1121/1.4868355
Alipour-Haghighi, F., Titze, I. R. & Perlman, A. L. Tetanic contraction in vocal fold muscle. J. Speech Hear. Res. 32, 226–231 (1989).
pubmed: 2739373
doi: 10.1044/jshr.3202.226
Chan, R. W. & Titze, I. R. Viscoelastic shear properties of human vocal fold mucosa: Theoretical characterization based on constitutive modeling. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 565–580 (2000).
pubmed: 10641665
doi: 10.1121/1.428354
Ishizaka, K. & Flanagan, J. L. Synthesis of voiced sounds from a two-mass model of the vocal cords. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 51, 1233–1268 (1972).
doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1972.tb02651.x
Story, B. H. & Titze, I. R. Parametrization of vocal tract areafunctions by empirical orthogonal modes. J. Phonetics 26, 223–260 (1998).
doi: 10.1006/jpho.1998.0076