Development of a machine learning-based model for predicting positive margins in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) treatment by Cold Knife Conization(CKC): a single-center retrospective study.
Humans
Female
Retrospective Studies
Machine Learning
Adult
Margins of Excision
Conization
/ methods
Middle Aged
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
/ surgery
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions
/ pathology
Risk Factors
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix
/ surgery
Uterine Cervical Dysplasia
/ surgery
Papillomavirus Infections
/ complications
Aged
Logistic Models
Cryosurgery
/ methods
Young Adult
CKC
HSIL
Machine learning
Positive margin
Predictive model
Journal
BMC women's health
ISSN: 1472-6874
Titre abrégé: BMC Womens Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088690
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Jun 2024
07 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
21
02
2024
accepted:
04
06
2024
medline:
8
6
2024
pubmed:
8
6
2024
entrez:
7
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aims to analyze factors associated with positive surgical margins following cold knife conization (CKC) in patients with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and to develop a machine-learning-based risk prediction model. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 3,343 patients who underwent CKC for HSIL at our institution. Logistic regression was employed to examine the relationship between demographic and pathological characteristics and the occurrence of positive surgical margins. Various machine learning methods were then applied to construct and evaluate the performance of the risk prediction model. The overall rate of positive surgical margins was 12.9%. Independent risk factors identified included glandular involvement (OR = 1.716, 95% CI: 1.345-2.189), transformation zone III (OR = 2.838, 95% CI: 2.258-3.568), HPV16/18 infection (OR = 2.863, 95% CI: 2.247-3.648), multiple HR-HPV infections (OR = 1.930, 95% CI: 1.537-2.425), TCT ≥ ASC-H (OR = 3.251, 95% CI: 2.584-4.091), and lesions covering ≥ 3 quadrants (OR = 3.264, 95% CI: 2.593-4.110). Logistic regression demonstrated the best prediction performance, with an accuracy of 74.7%, sensitivity of 76.7%, specificity of 74.4%, and AUC of 0.826. Independent risk factors for positive margins after CKC include HPV16/18 infection, multiple HR-HPV infections, glandular involvement, extensive lesion coverage, high TCT grades, and involvement of transformation zone III. The logistic regression model provides a robust and clinically valuable tool for predicting the risk of positive margins, guiding clinical decisions and patient management post-CKC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38849836
doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03180-2
pii: 10.1186/s12905-024-03180-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
332Subventions
Organisme : Jingzhou city science and technology guidance project
ID : 2023HC51
Organisme : Jingzhou city science and technology guidance project
ID : 2023HC51
Organisme : Jingzhou city science and technology guidance project
ID : 2023HC51
Organisme : Jingzhou city science and technology guidance project
ID : 2023HC51
Organisme : Jingzhou city science and technology guidance project
ID : 2023HC51
Organisme : Jingzhou city science and technology guidance project
ID : 2023HC51
Organisme : Jingzhou city science and technology guidance project
ID : 2023HC51
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Ostör AG. Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1993;12(2):186–92.
doi: 10.1097/00004347-199304000-00018
pubmed: 8463044
McCredie MR, Sharples KJ, Paul C, et al. Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(5):425–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70103-7 .
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70103-7
pubmed: 18407790
Sj GAO, Sui L. Standardized management and follow-up of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2020;07:604–8. https://doi.org/10.19538/j.fk2020070108 .
doi: 10.19538/j.fk2020070108
Zeng Y, Jiang T, Zheng Y, et al. Risk factors predicting residual lesion in subsequent hysterectomy following cold knife conization (CKC) for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). BMC Womens Health. 2022;22(1):358. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01939-z . Published 2022 Aug 30.
doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01939-z
pubmed: 36042513
pmcid: 9426006
Oliveira CA, Russomano FB, Gomes Júnior SC, Corrêa FM. Risk of persistent high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion after electrosurgical excisional treatment with positive margins: a meta-analysis. Sao Paulo Med J. 2012;130(2):119–25. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-31802012000200009 .
doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802012000200009
pubmed: 22481759
pmcid: 10896567
Darragh TM, Colgan TJ, Cox JT, et al. The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology Standardization Project for HPV-Associated Lesions: background and consensus recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology [published correction appears in J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013 Jul;17(3):368]. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2012;16(3):205–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0b013e31825c31dd .
doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31825c31dd
pubmed: 22820980
Chen Y, Lu H, Wan X, Lv W, Xie X. Factors associated with positive margins in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and postconization management. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;107(2):107–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.05.027 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.05.027
pubmed: 19628208
Arbyn M, Redman CWE, Verdoodt F, et al. Incomplete excision of cervical precancer as a predictor of treatment failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(12):1665–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30700-3 .
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30700-3
pubmed: 29126708
Kyrgiou M, Athanasiou A, Paraskevaidi M, et al. Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016;354:i3633. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3633 . Published 2016 Jul 28.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3633
pubmed: 27469988
pmcid: 4964801
Liu R, Liu C, Ding X. Association between loop electrosurgical excision procedure and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023;36(1):2183769. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2023.2183769 .
doi: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2183769
pubmed: 36866806
Costa S, De Nuzzo M, Terzano P, et al. Factors associated with cone margin involvement in CIN patients undergoing conization-equivalent electrosurgical procedure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79(7):586–92.
pubmed: 10929960
Shaco-Levy R, Eger G, Dreiher J, Benharroch D, Meirovitz M. Positive margin status in uterine cervix cone specimens is associated with persistent/recurrent high-grade dysplasia. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2014;33(1):83–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/PGP.0b013e3182763158 .
doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e3182763158
pubmed: 24300540
Xu QX, Zhang ZY. High-risk human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical lesions and vaccination challenges in China. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(6):2193–7. https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.6.2193 .
doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.6.2193
pubmed: 25824736
Singh S, Zhou Q, Yu Y, et al. Distribution of HPV genotypes in Shanghai women. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(9):11901–8.
pubmed: 26617946
pmcid: 4637762
Macdonald M, Smith JHF, Tidy JA, Palmer JE. Conservative management of CIN2: National Audit of British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology members’ opinion. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;38(3):388–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2017.1316973 .
doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1316973
pubmed: 29212399
Kang WD, Ju UC, Kim SM. A human papillomavirus (HPV)-16 or HPV-18 genotype is a reliable predictor of residual disease in a subsequent hysterectomy following a loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3. J Gynecol Oncol. 2016;27(1):e2.
doi: 10.3802/jgo.2016.27.e2
pubmed: 26463431
Sun XG, Ma SQ, Zhang JX, Wu M. Predictors and clinical significance of the positive cone margin in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III patients. Chin Med J (Engl). 2009;122(4):367–72.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2009.04.002
pubmed: 19302737
Wang X, Xu J, Gao Y, Qu P. Necessity for subsequent surgery in women of child-bearing age with positive margins after conization [published correction appears in BMC Womens Health. 2021 Jun 1;21(1):228]. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):191. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01329-x .
doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01329-x
pubmed: 33962590
pmcid: 8103630
An J, Lei H, Xie X, Sun P. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens. Oncol Res Treat. 2020;43(10):518–25. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509254 .
doi: 10.1159/000509254
pubmed: 32772026
Maisel SA, Broka D, Atwell B, et al. Stapled EGFR peptide reduces inflammatory breast cancer and inhibits additional HER-driven models of cancer. J Transl Med. 2019;17(1):201. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-1939-7 . Published 2019 Jun 18.
doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-1939-7
pubmed: 31215437
pmcid: 6582486
Tasci T, Turan T, Ureyen I, et al. Is there any predictor for residual disease after cervical conization with positive surgical margins for HSIL or microinvasive cervical cancer? J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2015;19(2):115–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000079 .
doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000079
pubmed: 25259663