Minimisation of dialysis risk in hospital patients with chronic kidney disease (MinDial): study protocol for a multicentre, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial.


Journal

Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 08 05 2024
accepted: 17 05 2024
medline: 8 6 2024
pubmed: 8 6 2024
entrez: 7 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Early identification of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and advancing kidney insufficiency, followed by specialist care, can decelerate the progression of the disease. However, awareness of the importance and possible consequences of kidney insufficiency is low among doctors and patients. Since kidney insufficiency can be asymptomatic even in higher stages, it is often not even known to those belonging to risk groups. This study aims to clarify whether, for hospitalised patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, a risk-based appointment with a nephrology specialist reduces disease progression. The target population of the study is hospitalised CKD patients with an increased risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), more specifically with an ESRD risk of at least 9% in the next 5 years. This risk is estimated by the internationally validated Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE). The intervention consists of a specific appointment with a nephrology specialist after the hospital stay, while control patients are discharged from the hospital as usual. Eight medical centres include participants according to a stepped-wedge design, with randomised sequential centre-wise crossover from recruiting patients into the control group to recruitment to the intervention. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is measured for each patient during the hospital stay and after 12 months within the regular care by the general practitioner. The difference in the change of the eGFR over this period is compared between the intervention and control groups and considered the primary endpoint. This study is designed to evaluate the effect of risk-based appointments with nephrology specialists for hospitalised CKD patients with an increased risk of end-stage renal disease. If the intervention is proven to be beneficial, it may be implemented in routine care. Limitations will be examined and discussed. The evaluation will include further endpoints such as non-guideline-compliant medication, economic considerations and interviews with contributing physicians to assess the acceptance and feasibility of the intervention. German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00029691 . Registered on 12 September 2022.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Early identification of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and advancing kidney insufficiency, followed by specialist care, can decelerate the progression of the disease. However, awareness of the importance and possible consequences of kidney insufficiency is low among doctors and patients. Since kidney insufficiency can be asymptomatic even in higher stages, it is often not even known to those belonging to risk groups. This study aims to clarify whether, for hospitalised patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, a risk-based appointment with a nephrology specialist reduces disease progression.
METHODS METHODS
The target population of the study is hospitalised CKD patients with an increased risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), more specifically with an ESRD risk of at least 9% in the next 5 years. This risk is estimated by the internationally validated Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE). The intervention consists of a specific appointment with a nephrology specialist after the hospital stay, while control patients are discharged from the hospital as usual. Eight medical centres include participants according to a stepped-wedge design, with randomised sequential centre-wise crossover from recruiting patients into the control group to recruitment to the intervention. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is measured for each patient during the hospital stay and after 12 months within the regular care by the general practitioner. The difference in the change of the eGFR over this period is compared between the intervention and control groups and considered the primary endpoint.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
This study is designed to evaluate the effect of risk-based appointments with nephrology specialists for hospitalised CKD patients with an increased risk of end-stage renal disease. If the intervention is proven to be beneficial, it may be implemented in routine care. Limitations will be examined and discussed. The evaluation will include further endpoints such as non-guideline-compliant medication, economic considerations and interviews with contributing physicians to assess the acceptance and feasibility of the intervention.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00029691 . Registered on 12 September 2022.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38849916
doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08182-x
pii: 10.1186/s13063-024-08182-x
doi:

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Protocol Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

368

Subventions

Organisme : Innovation Fund of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA), Germany
ID : 01NVF20028

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Brück Katharina, Stel Vianda S, Gambaro Giovanni, Hallan Stein, Völzke Henry, Ärnlöv Johan, et al. CKD Prevalence Varies across the European General Population. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(7):2135–47. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2015050542 .
doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015050542 pubmed: 26701975
Baumeister Sebastian E, Böger Carsten A, Krämer Bernhard K, Döring Angela, Eheberg Dirk, Fischer Beate, et al. Effect of chronic kidney disease and comorbid conditions on health care costs: a 10-year observational study in a general population. Am J Nephrol. 2010;31(3):222–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000272937 .
doi: 10.1159/000272937 pubmed: 20068286
Black C, Sharma P, Scotland G, McCullough K, McGurn D, Robertson L, et al. Early referral strategies for management of people with markers of renal disease: a systematic review of the evidence of clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and economic analysis. Health Technol Assess (Winchester, England). 2010;14(21):1–184. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta14210 .
doi: 10.3310/hta14210
Jones C, Roderick P, Harris S, Rogerson M. Decline in kidney function before and after nephrology referral and the effect on survival in moderate to advanced chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21(8):2133–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfl198 .
doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl198 pubmed: 16644779
Lee B, Turley M, Di M, Zhou Y, Garrido T, Lau A, Radler L. Effects of proactive population-based nephrologist oversight on progression of chronic kidney disease: a retrospective control analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:252. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-252 .
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-252 pubmed: 22894681 pmcid: 3470950
Plantinga Laura C, Tuot Delphine S, Powe Neil R. Awareness of chronic kidney disease among patients and providers. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2010;17(3):225–36. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ackd.2010.03.002 .
doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2010.03.002 pubmed: 20439091 pmcid: 2864779
Stolpe S, Kowall B, Scholz C, Stang A, Blume C. High unwareness of chronic kidney disease in Germany. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(22):11752. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph.182211752 .
doi: 10.3390/ijerph.182211752 pubmed: 34831506 pmcid: 8623832
Martin Wagner, Christoph Wanner, Martin Schich, Kornelia Kotseva, David Wood, Katrin Hartmann, et al. Patient’s and physician’s awareness of kidney disease in coronary heart disease patients - a cross-sectional analysis of the German subset of the EUROASPIRE IV survey. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18(1):321. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0730-3 .
doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0730-3
Busch Martin, Nadal Jennifer, Schmid Matthias, Paul Katharina, Titze Stephanie, Hübner Silvia, et al. Glycaemic control and antidiabetic therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease - cross-sectional data from the German Chronic Kidney Disease (GCKD) cohort. BMC Nephrol. 2016;17(1):59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-016-0273-z .
doi: 10.1186/s12882-016-0273-z pubmed: 27286816 pmcid: 4902996
Schneider MP, Hilgers KF, Schmid M, Hübner S, Nadal J, Seitz D, et al. Blood pressure control in chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional analysis from the German Chronic Kidney Disease (GCKD) study. PloS One. 2018;13(8):e0202604. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202604 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202604 pubmed: 30125326 pmcid: 6101389
Hesselink G, Schoonhoven L, Barach P, Spijker A, Gademan P, Kalkman C, et al. Improving patient handovers from hospital to primary care: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(6):417–28. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00006 .
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00006 pubmed: 22986379
de Wilde M, Speeckaert M, van Biesen W. Can increased vigilance for chronic kidney disease in hospitalised patients decrease late referral and improve dialysis-free survival? BMC Nephrol. 2018;19(1):74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-018-0869-6 .
doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-0869-6 pubmed: 29606094 pmcid: 5880091
Lenz O, Mekala DP, Patel DV, Fornoni A, Metz D, Roth D. Barriers to successful care for chronic kidney disease. BMC Nephrol. 2005;6:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-6-11 .
doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-6-11 pubmed: 16250919 pmcid: 1283975
Tangri Navdeep, Stevens Lesley A, Griffith John, Tighiouart Hocine, Djurdjev Ognjenka, Naimark David, et al. predictive model for progression of chronic kidney disease to kidney failure. JAMA. 2011;305(15):1553–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.451 .
doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.451 pubmed: 21482743
Major RW, Shepherd D, Medcalf JF, Xu G, Gray LJ, Brunskill NJ. The Kidney Failure Risk Equation for prediction of end stage renal disease in UK primary care: an external validation and clinical impact projection cohort study. PLoS Med. 2019;16(11):e1002955. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002955 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002955 pubmed: 31693662 pmcid: 6834237
Smekal Michelle D, Tam-Tham Helen, Finlay Juli, Donald Maoliosa, Benterud Eleanor, Thomas Chandra, et al. Perceived benefits and challenges of a risk-based approach to multidisciplinary chronic kidney disease care: a qualitative descriptive study. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2018;5:2054358118763809. https://doi.org/10.1177/2054358118763809 .
doi: 10.1177/2054358118763809 pubmed: 29636981 pmcid: 5888822
Peeters Mieke J, van Zuilen Arjan D, van den Brand Jan A. J. G, Bots Michiel L, Blankestijn Peter J, Wetzels Jack F, M. Validation of the kidney failure risk equation in European CKD patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28(7):1773–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gft063 .
doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft063 pubmed: 23645476
Levey AS, Gansevoort RT, Coresh J, Inker LA, Heerspink HL, Grams ME, et al. Change in albuminuria and GFR as end points for clinical trials in early stages of CKD: a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation in collaboration with the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;75(1):84–104. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.06.009 .
doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.06.009 pubmed: 31473020
Kerry SM, Bland JM. The intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomisation. BMJ. 1998;316(7142):1455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7142.1455 .
doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7142.1455 pubmed: 9572764 pmcid: 1113123
McCudden C, Akbari A, White CA, Biyani M, Hiremath S, Brown PA, et al. Individual patient variability with the application of the kidney failure risk equation in advanced chronic kidney disease. PloS One. 2018;13(6):e0198456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198456 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198456 pubmed: 29894480 pmcid: 5997334
Ouyang Y, Xu L, Karim ME, Gustafson P, Wong H. CRTpowerdist: An R package to calculate attained power and construct the power distribution for cross-sectional stepped-wedge and parallel cluster randomized trials. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021;208: 106255. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CMPB.2021.106255 .
doi: 10.1016/J.CMPB.2021.106255 pubmed: 34260969
Voldal EC, Hakhu NR, Xia F, Heagerty PJ, Hughes JP. swCRTdesign: an RPackage for stepped wedge trial design and analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020;196: 105514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105514 .
doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105514 pubmed: 32554025 pmcid: 8559260
Hemming K, Lilford R, Girling AJ. Stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trials: a generic framework including parallel and multiple-level designs. Stat Med. 2015;34(2):181–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6325 .
doi: 10.1002/sim.6325 pubmed: 25346484
Bock JO, Brettschneider C, Seidl H, Bowles D, Holle R, Greiner W, Koenig HH. Ermittlung standardisierter Bewertungssätze aus gesellschaftlicher Perspektive für die gesundheitsökonomische Evaluation. Das Gesundheitswesen. 2015;77(1):53–61. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1374621 .
doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1374621 pubmed: 25025287
Fieller EC. Some problems in interval estimation. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 1954;16(2):175–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1954.tb00159.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1954.tb00159.x
Willan AR, Briggs AH.  Statistical analysis of cost-effectiveness data. 2006. John Wiley & Sons.  https://doi.org/10.1002/0470856289
Schreier M. Varianten qualitativer Inhaltsanalyse: Ein Wegweiser im Dickicht der Begrifflichkeiten. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 2014;15(1):1–17. Art. 18. PID: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1401185.
Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8 .
doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8 pubmed: 28126032 pmcid: 5267473

Auteurs

D Stelzer (D)

Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Str. 26, Freiburg, 79104, Germany. dominikus.stelzer@uniklinik-freiburg.de.

H Binder (H)

Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Str. 26, Freiburg, 79104, Germany.

M Glattacker (M)

Section of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 49, Freiburg, 79106, Germany.

E Graf (E)

Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Str. 26, Freiburg, 79104, Germany.

M Hahn (M)

Knappschafts-Kliniken Service GmbH (KKSG), In der Schornau 23-25, Bochum, 44892, Germany.

M Hollenbeck (M)

Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bottrop GmbH, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Duisburg-Essen, Osterfelder Straße 157, Bottrop, 46242, Germany.

K Kaier (K)

Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Str. 26, Freiburg, 79104, Germany.

B Kowall (B)

Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen, 45147, Germany.

N Kuklik (N)

Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen, 45147, Germany.
Centre for Clinical Trials Essen, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen, 45122, Germany.

G Metzner (G)

Section of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 49, Freiburg, 79106, Germany.

N Mueller (N)

Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bottrop GmbH, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Duisburg-Essen, Osterfelder Straße 157, Bottrop, 46242, Germany.

L Seiler (L)

Institute of Technical Chemistry, Leibniz University Hannover, Callinstraße 5, Hannover, 30167, Germany.
KfH Foundation for Preventive Medicine, Martin-Behaim-Straße 20, Neu-Isenburg, 63263, Germany.

S Stolpe (S)

Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen, 45147, Germany.

C Blume (C)

Institute of Technical Chemistry, Leibniz University Hannover, Callinstraße 5, Hannover, 30167, Germany.
KfH Foundation for Preventive Medicine, Martin-Behaim-Straße 20, Neu-Isenburg, 63263, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH