Penile prosthesis implantation: a bibliometric-based visualization study.
Journal
International journal of impotence research
ISSN: 1476-5489
Titre abrégé: Int J Impot Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007383
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Jun 2024
08 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
19
12
2023
accepted:
31
05
2024
revised:
22
05
2024
medline:
9
6
2024
pubmed:
9
6
2024
entrez:
8
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) using penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) has recently garnered significant interest, but reports of bibliometric analyses of studies on PPI have yet to appear. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to use visualization techniques to statistically and qualitatively assess the state of knowledge, current research topics, and trends in this field. The Science Citation Index-Expanded (SCI-E) from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) was searched for publications about PPI from the inception of the database to 2023. VOSviewer (version 1.6.19), CiteSpace (version 6.2. R2), and Excel (version 2021) were used for the data analysis. The results show a total of 1015 original articles and reviews on PPI published over this nearly 50 years, with an increasing trend in the number of studies published each year. The United States is the country with the most published studies (n = 578). Mayo Clinic is the organization with the most publications overall (n = 46). The Journal of Sexual Medicine has the most publications (n = 184). The most prolific author is Wilson, Steven K (n = 31). The most commonly used terms were erectile dysfunction (n = 509), penile prosthesis (n = 332), implantation (n = 207), satisfaction (n = 201), surgery (n = 200), infection (n = 134), outcomes (n = 128), Peyronie's disease (n = 121), men (n = 115), and experience (n = 109). Current research focuses on four main areas: complications of PPI, the current status of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP), the use of PPI in radical prostatectomy and Peyronie's disease populations, and patient satisfaction after PPI. Improving patient satisfaction with PPI through improved mechanical design and surgical techniques is a key concern for future research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38851852
doi: 10.1038/s41443-024-00927-1
pii: 10.1038/s41443-024-00927-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Management of erectile impotence use of implantable inflatable prosthesis. Urology. 1973;2:80–2.
pubmed: 4766860
doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(73)90224-0
Chung E, Van CT, Wilson I, Cartmill RA. Penile prosthesis implantation for the treatment for male erectile dysfunction: clinical outcomes and lessons learnt after 955 procedures. World J Urol. 2013;31:591–5.
pubmed: 22457032
doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0859-4
Mark KP, Arenella K, Girard A, Herbenick D, Fu J, Coleman E. Erectile dysfunction prevalence in the United States: report from the 2021 National Survey of Sexual Wellbeing. J Sex Med. 2024;21:296–303.
Ayta IA, McKinlay JB, Krane RJ. The likely worldwide increase in erectile dysfunction between 1995 and 2025 and some possible policy consequences. BJU Int. 1999;84:50–6.
pubmed: 10444124
doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00142.x
Edwards D, Hackett G, Collins O, Curram J. Vardenafil improves sexual function and treatment satisfaction in couples affected by erectile dysfunction (ED): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in PDE5 inhibitor-naïve men with ED and their partners. J Sex Med. 2006;3:1028–36.
pubmed: 17100936
doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00329.x
Nagao K, Ishii N, Kamidono S, Osada T. Safety and efficacy of vardenafil in patients with erectile dysfunction: result of a bridging study in Japan. Int J Urol. 2004;11:515–24.
pubmed: 15242361
doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00833.x
McMahon CN, Smith CJ, Shabsigh R. Treating erectile dysfunction when PDE5 inhibitors fail. Bmj. 2006;332:589–92.
pubmed: 16528082
pmcid: 1397768
doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7541.589
Raina R, Lakin MM, Thukral M, Agarwal A, Ausmundson S, Montague DK, et al. Long-term efficacy and compliance of intracorporeal (IC) injection for erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy: SHIM (IIEF-5) analysis. Int J Impot Res. 2003;15:318–22.
pubmed: 14562131
doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901025
Tao R, Chen J, Wang D, Li Y, Xiang J, Xiong L, et al. The Efficacy of Li-ESWT Combined With VED in Diabetic ED Patients Unresponsive to PDE5is: A Single-Center, Randomized Clinical Trial. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:937958.
pubmed: 35813628
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.937958
Cunningham GR, Stephens-Shields AJ, Rosen RC, Wang C, Bhasin S, Matsumoto AM, et al. Testosterone Treatment and Sexual Function in Older Men With Low Testosterone Levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101:3096–104.
pubmed: 27355400
pmcid: 4971331
doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-1645
Wilson SK, Delk JR, Salem EA, Cleves MA. Long-term survival of inflatable penile prostheses: single surgical group experience with 2,384 first-time implants spanning two decades. J Sex Med. 2007;4:1074–9.
pubmed: 17627751
doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00540.x
Mulhall J, Anderson M, Parker M. A surgical algorithm for men with combined Peyronie’s disease and erectile dysfunction: functional and satisfaction outcomes. J Sex Med. 2005;2:132–8.
pubmed: 16422916
doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.20113.x
Minervini A, Ralph DJ, Pryor JP. Outcome of penile prosthesis implantation for treating erectile dysfunction: experience with 504 procedures. BJU Int. 2006;97:129–33.
pubmed: 16336342
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05907.x
Jorissen C, De Bruyna H, Baten E, Van Renterghem K. Clinical Outcome: Patient and Partner Satisfaction after Penile Implant Surgery. Curr Urol. 2019;13:94–100.
pubmed: 31768176
pmcid: 6872984
doi: 10.1159/000499286
Burnett AL, Nehra A, Breau RH, Culkin DJ, Faraday MM, Hakim LS, et al. Erectile Dysfunction: AUA Guideline. J Urol. 2018;200:633–41.
pubmed: 29746858
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.004
Sansalone S, Garaffa G, Djinovic R, Antonini G, Vespasiani G, Ieria FP, et al. Simultaneous total corporal reconstruction and implantation of a penile prosthesis in patients with erectile dysfunction and severe fibrosis of the corpora cavernosa. J Sex Med. 2012;9:1937–44.
pubmed: 22672346
doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02748.x
Szostak MJ, DelPizzo JJ, Sklar GN. The plug and patch: a new technique for repair of corporal perforation during placement of penile prostheses. J Urol. 2000;163:1203–5.
pubmed: 10737496
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67723-3
Anele UA, Le BV, Burnett AL. Suprapubic cystostomy for the management of urethral injuries during penile prosthesis implantation. Sex Med. 2014;2:178–81.
pubmed: 25548649
pmcid: 4272249
doi: 10.1002/sm2.44
Cakan M, Demirel F, Karabacak O, Yalçinkaya F, Altuğ U. Risk factors for penile prosthetic infection. Int Urol Nephrol. 2003;35:209–13.
pubmed: 15072498
doi: 10.1023/B:UROL.0000020300.23522.49
Levine LA, Estrada CR, Morgentaler A. Mechanical reliability and safety of, and patient satisfaction with the Ambicor inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a 2 center study. J Urol. 2001;166:932–7.
pubmed: 11490249
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65867-3
Kardar A, Pettersson BA. Penile gangrene: a complication of penile prosthesis. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1995;29:355–6.
pubmed: 8578284
doi: 10.3109/00365599509180591
McLaren RH, Barrett DM. Patient and partner satisfaction with the AMS 700 penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1992;147:62–5.
pubmed: 1729553
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37134-3
Whalen RK, Merrill DC. Patient satisfaction with Mentor inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology. 1991;37:531–9.
pubmed: 2038786
doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(91)80318-2
Pritchard A. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. J Doc. 1969;25:348.
Jones T, Huggett S, Kamalski J. Finding a way through the scientific literature: indexes and measures. World Neurosurg. 2011;76:36–8.
pubmed: 21839937
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.01.015
Eyre-Walker A, Stoletzki N. The assessment of science: the relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor, and the number of citations. PLoS Biol. 2013;11:e1001675.
pubmed: 24115908
pmcid: 3792863
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001675
Šubelj L, Eck NJV, Waltman L Clustering Scientific Publications Based on Citation Relations: A Systematic Comparison of Different Methods. PLoS One. 2016.
Levine LA, Becher EF, Bella AJ, Brant WO, Kohler TS, Martinez-Salamanca JI, et al. Penile Prosthesis Surgery: Current Recommendations From the International Consultation on Sexual Medicine. J Sex Med. 2016;13:489–518.
pubmed: 27045255
doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.017
Carson CC, Mulcahy JJ, Govier FE. Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction outcomes of the AMS 700CX inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a long-term multicenter study. AMS 700CX Study Group. J Urol. 2000;164:376–80.
Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Management of erectile impotence. Use of implantable inflatable prosthesis. Urology. 1973;2:80–2.
pubmed: 4766860
doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(73)90224-0
Eck NJV, Waltman L Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. Eprint Arxiv. 2011.
Chen C. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2006;57:359–77.
doi: 10.1002/asi.20317
Wilson SK, Carson CC, Cleves MA, Delk JR 2nd. Quantifying risk of penile prosthesis infection with elevated glycosylated hemoglobin. J Urol. 1998;159:1537–9.
pubmed: 9554349
doi: 10.1097/00005392-199805000-00034
Morey AF, Cefalu CA, Hudak SJ. High submuscular placement of urologic prosthetic balloons and reservoirs via transscrotal approach. J Sex Med. 2013;10:603–10.
pubmed: 23216955
doi: 10.1111/jsm.12000
Wang R, Howard GE, Hoang A, Yuan JH, Lin HC, Dai YT. Prospective and long-term evaluation of erect penile length obtained with inflatable penile prosthesis to that induced by intracavernosal injection. Asian J Androl. 2009;11:411–5.
pubmed: 19525974
pmcid: 3735309
doi: 10.1038/aja.2009.35
Levine LA, Rybak J. Traction therapy for men with shortened penis prior to penile prosthesis implantation: a pilot study. J Sex Med. 2011;8:2112–7.
pubmed: 21492409
doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02285.x
Carson CC 3rd, Mulcahy JJ, Harsch MR. Long-term infection outcomes after original antibiotic impregnated inflatable penile prosthesis implants: up to 7.7 years of followup. J Urol. 2011;185:614–8.
pubmed: 21168870
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.094
Montague DK, Angermeir KW. Surgical approaches for penile prosthesis implantation: penoscrotal vs infrapubic. Int J Impot Res. 2003;15:S134–5.
pubmed: 14551592
doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901089
Kramer A, Chason J. Residents at the University of Maryland Medical System provide insight to learning infrapubic approach for IPP surgery: relative benefits but novel challenges exposed in first 15 cases. J Sex Med. 2010;7:1298–305.
pubmed: 19929919
doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01588.x
Grande P, Antonini G, Cristini C, De Berardinis E, Gatto A, Di Lascio G, et al. Penoscrotal versus minimally invasive infrapubic approach for inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a single-center matched-pair analysis. World J Urol. 2018;36:1167–74.
pubmed: 29492584
doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2249-z
Li K, Brandes ER, Chang SL, Leow JJ, Chung BI, Wang Y, et al. Trends in penile prosthesis implantation and analysis of predictive factors for removal. World J Urol. 2019;37:639–46.
pubmed: 30251052
doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2491-4
Govier FE, Gibbons RP, Correa RJ, Pritchett TR, Kramer-Levien D. Mechanical reliability, surgical complications, and patient and partner satisfaction of the modern three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology. 1998;52:282–6.
pubmed: 9697795
doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00177-0
Jarow JP. Risk factors for penile prosthetic infection. J Urol. 1996;156:402–4.
pubmed: 8683689
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65860-9
Wilson SK, Delk JR 2nd. Inflatable penile implant infection: predisposing factors and treatment suggestions. J Urol. 1995;153:659–61.
pubmed: 7861509
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67678-X
Sørensen LT. Wound healing and infection in surgery. The clinical impact of smoking and smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2012;147:373–83.
pubmed: 22508785
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.5
Collins KP, Hackler RH. Complications of penile prostheses in the spinal cord injury population. J Urol. 1988;140:984–5.
pubmed: 3172373
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)41905-7
Christodoulidou M, Pearce I. Infection of Penile Prostheses in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus. Surg Infect. 2016;17:2–8.
doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.164
Bishop JR, Moul JW, Sihelnik SA, Peppas DS, Gormley TS, McLeod DG. Use of glycosylated hemoglobin to identify diabetics at high risk for penile periprosthetic infections. J Urol. 1992;147:386–8.
pubmed: 1732600
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37244-0
Dhabuwala C, Sheth S, Zamzow B. Infection rates of rifampin/gentamicin-coated Titan Coloplast penile implants. Comparison with Inhibizone-impregnated AMS penile implants. J Sex Med. 2011;8:315–20.
pubmed: 20946163
doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02068.x
Wilson SK, Salem EA, Costerton W. Anti-infection dip suggestions for the Coloplast Titan Inflatable Penile Prosthesis in the era of the infection retardant coated implant. J Sex Med. 2011;8:2647–54.
pubmed: 21699668
doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02363.x
Eid JF. Penile Implant: Review of a “No-Touch” Technique. Sex Med Rev. 2016;4:294–300.
pubmed: 27871962
doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2016.01.002
Alwaal A, Harris CR, Hussein AA, Sanford TH, McCulloch CE, Shindel AW, et al. The Decline of Inpatient Penile Prosthesis over the 10-Year Period, 2000-10. Sex Med. 2015;3:280–6.
pubmed: 26797062
pmcid: 4721026
doi: 10.1002/sm2.82
Nielsen KT, Bruskewitz RC. Semirigid and malleable rod penile prostheses. Urol Clin North Am. 1989;16:13–23.
pubmed: 2916270
doi: 10.1016/S0094-0143(21)01475-0
Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2017;71:618–29.
pubmed: 27568654
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003
Resnick MJ, Koyama T, Fan KH, Albertsen PC, Goodman M, Hamilton AS, et al. Long-term functional outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:436–45.
pubmed: 23363497
pmcid: 3742365
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209978
Catalona WJ, Basler JW. Return of erections and urinary continence following nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 1993;150:905–7.
pubmed: 8345607
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35645-8
Alanazi G, Alsubaie N, Nabi G, Gillingwater TH, Alashkham A. Distribution of neurovascular structures within the prostate gland and their relationship to complications after radical prostatectomy. Prostate. 2024;84:491–501.
pubmed: 38173273
doi: 10.1002/pros.24667
Henry GD, Karpman E, Brant W, Christine B, Kansas BT, Khera M, et al. The Who, How and What of Real-World Penile Implantation in 2015: The PROPPER Registry Baseline Data. J Urol. 2016;195:427–33.
pubmed: 26292043
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.109
Lucas MG, Bosch RJ, Burkhard FC, Cruz F, Madden TB, Nambiar AK, et al. EAU guidelines on surgical treatment of urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2012;62:1118–29.
pubmed: 23040204
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.09.023
Kim PH, Pinheiro LC, Atoria CL, Eastham JA, Sandhu JS, Elkin EB. Trends in the use of incontinence procedures after radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis. J Urol. 2013;189:602–8.
pubmed: 23017528
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.246
Berge V, Thompson T, Blackman D. Additional surgical intervention after radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, androgen-deprivation therapy, or watchful waiting. Eur Urol. 2007;52:1036–43.
pubmed: 17178188
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.12.012
Segal RL, Cabrini MR, Harris ED, Mostwin JL, Bivalacqua TJ, Burnett AL. Combined inflatable penile prosthesis-artificial urinary sphincter implantation: no increased risk of adverse events compared to single or staged device implantation. J Urol. 2013;190:2183–8.
pubmed: 23831315
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.084
Deveci S, Hopps CV, O’Brien K, Parker M, Guhring P, Mulhall JP. Defining the clinical characteristics of Peyronie’s disease in young men. J Sex Med. 2007;4:485–90.
pubmed: 17081219
doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00344.x
Kadioglu A, Tefekli A, Erol B, Oktar T, Tunc M, Tellaloglu S. A retrospective review of 307 men with Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 2002;168:1075–9.
pubmed: 12187226
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64578-8
La Croce G, Schifano N, Pescatori E, Caraceni E, Colombo F, Bettocchi C, et al. Which patient may benefit the most from penile prosthesis implantation? Andrology. 2022;10:1567–74.
pubmed: 36088578
doi: 10.1111/andr.13294
Chung E, Solomon M, DeYoung L, Brock GB. Comparison between AMS 700™ CX and Coloplast™ Titan inflatable penile prosthesis for Peyronie’s disease treatment and remodeling: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. J Sex Med. 2013;10:2855–60.
pubmed: 23210973
doi: 10.1111/jsm.12009
Wilson SK, Delk JR 2nd. A new treatment for Peyronie’s disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1994;152:1121–3.
pubmed: 8072079
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)32519-3
Levine LA, Dimitriou RJ. A surgical algorithm for penile prosthesis placement in men with erectile failure and Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res. 2000;12:147–51.
pubmed: 11045907
doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900515
Levine LA, Benson J, Hoover C. Inflatable penile prosthesis placement in men with Peyronie’s disease and drug-resistant erectile dysfunction: A single-center study. J Sex Med. 2010;7:3775–83.
pubmed: 20722782
doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01971.x
Tefilli MV, Dubocq F, Rajpurkar A, Gheiler EL, Tiguert R, Barton C, et al. Assessment of psychosexual adjustment after insertion of inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology. 1998;52:1106–12.
pubmed: 9836564
doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00362-8
Steege JF, Stout AL, Carson CC. Patient satisfaction in Scott and Small-Carrion penile implant recipients: a study of 52 patients. Arch Sex Behav. 1986;15:393–9.
pubmed: 3789903
doi: 10.1007/BF01543110
Trost L, Hellstrom WJ. History, Contemporary Outcomes, and Future of Penile Prostheses: A Review of the Literature. Sex Med Rev. 2013;1:150–63.
pubmed: 27784554
doi: 10.1002/smrj.8
Lux M, Reyes-Vallejo L, Morgentaler A, Levine LA. Outcomes and satisfaction rates for the redesigned 2-piece penile prosthesis. J Urol. 2007;177:262–6.
pubmed: 17162061
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.094
Bozkurt IH, Arslan B, Yonguc T, Kozacıoglu Z, Degirmenci T, Gunlusoy B, et al. Patient and partner outcome of inflatable and semi-rigid penile prosthesis in a single institution. Int Braz J Urol. 2015;41:535–41.
pubmed: 26200547
pmcid: 4752147
doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0241
Çayan S, Aşcı R, Efesoy O, Bolat MS, Akbay E, Yaman Ö. Comparison of Long-Term Results and Couples’ Satisfaction with Penile Implant Types and Brands: Lessons Learned From 883 Patients With Erectile Dysfunction Who Underwent Penile Prosthesis Implantation. J Sex Med. 2019;16:1092–9.
pubmed: 31155387
doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.04.013
Akin-Olugbade O, Parker M, Guhring P, Mulhall J. Determinants of patient satisfaction following penile prosthesis surgery. J Sex Med. 2006;3:743–8.
pubmed: 16839332
doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00278.x
Savoie M, Kim SS, Soloway MS. A prospective study measuring penile length in men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2003;169:1462–4.
pubmed: 12629384
doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000053720.93303.33
Mulhall JP. Penile length changes after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2005;96:472–4.
pubmed: 16104892
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05666.x
Gontero P, Galzerano M, Bartoletti R, Magnani C, Tizzani A, Frea B, et al. New insights into the pathogenesis of penile shortening after radical prostatectomy and the role of postoperative sexual function. J Urol. 2007;178:602–7.
pubmed: 17570431
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.119
Rolle L, Ceruti C, Timpano M, Sedigh O, Destefanis P, Galletto E, et al. A new, innovative, lengthening surgical procedure for Peyronie’s disease by penile prosthesis implantation with double dorsal-ventral patch graft: the “sliding technique. J Sex Med. 2012;9:2389–95.
pubmed: 22429331
doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02675.x
Egydio PH, Kuehhas FE. Penile lengthening and widening without grafting according to a modified ‘sliding’ technique. BJU Int. 2015;116:965–72.
pubmed: 25644141
doi: 10.1111/bju.13065
Rolle L, Falcone M, Ceruti C, Timpano M, Sedigh O, Ralph DJ, et al. A prospective multicentric international study on the surgical outcomes and patients’ satisfaction rates of the ‘sliding’ technique for end-stage Peyronie’s disease with severe shortening of the penis and erectile dysfunction. BJU Int. 2016;117:814–20.
pubmed: 26688436
doi: 10.1111/bju.13371